A life cycle assessment study of a Canadian post-combustion carbon dioxide capture process system
While carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) has been widely recognized as a useful technology for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, it is necessary to evaluate the environmental performance of CCS from a full life cycle perspective to comprehensively understand its environmental impacts. The primary research objective is to conduct a study on life cycle assessment of the post-combustion carbon dioxide capture process based on data from SaskPower’s electricity generation station at the Boundary Dam in Saskatchewan, Canada. A secondary objective of this study is to identify the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methodology which is most suitable for the assessment of carbon dioxide capture technology integrated with the power generation system in the Canadian context.
The study takes a comparative approach by including three scenarios of carbon dioxide capture at the electricity generation station: no carbon dioxide capture (“no capture”), partial capture (“retrofit”), and fully integrated carbon dioxide capture of the entire facility (“capture”). The four LCIA methods of EDIP 97, CML2001, IMPACT2002+, and TRACI are used to convert existing inventory data into environmental impacts. The LCIA results from the four methods are compared and interpreted based on midpoint categories.
Results and discussion
The LCA results showed an increase in the retrofit and capture scenarios compared to the no capture scenario in the impact categories of eutrophication air, ecotoxicity water, ecotoxicity ground surface soil, eutrophication water, human health cancer ground surface soil, human health cancer water, human health noncancer ground surface soil, ozone depletion air, human health noncancer water, and ionizing radiation. The reductions were observed in the retrofit and capture scenarios in the impact categories of acidification, human health criteria air-point source, human health noncancer air, ecotoxicity air, global warming, human health cancer air, and respiratory effects.
Although the four LCIA methodologies significantly differ in terms of reference substances used for individual impact categories, all (TRACI, IMPACT2002+, CML2001, and EDIP 97) showed similar results in all impact categories.
KeywordsCarbon dioxide (CO2) post-combustion capture CML2001 EDIP 97 IMPACT2002+ Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) Midpoint approach TRACI
- Althaus H-J, Chudacoff M, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Jungbluth N, Osses M, Primas A (2004) Life cycle inventories of chemicals. Ecoinvent Report No. 8. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, DübendorfGoogle Scholar
- ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management–life cycle assessment–principles and framework. International Standard ISO 14040. Geneva: International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
- ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management–life cycle assessment–requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044. Geneva: International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
- Manuilova A (2011) Evaluation of environmental performance of carbon capture and storage project in Canada using life cycle assessment methodology. PhD. Thesis, University of Regina, Regina, SKGoogle Scholar
- Spath P, Mann M, Kerr D (1999) Life cycle assessment of coal-fired power production. Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-570-27715, US National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
- Suebsiri J (2010) An environmental model of carbon capture and storage with demonstration to carbon footprint and resource deletion evaluation. PhD. Thesis, University of Regina, Regina, SKGoogle Scholar