Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of blended cement concrete including carbonation and durability
- First Online:
Blended cements use waste products to replace Portland cement, the main contributor to CO2 emissions in concrete manufacture. Using blended cements reduces the embodied greenhouse gas emissions; however, little attention has been paid to the reduction in CO2 capture (carbonation) and durability. The aim of this study is to determine if the reduction in production emissions of blended cements compensates for the reduced durability and CO2 capture.
This study evaluates CO2 emissions and CO2 capture for a reinforced concrete column during its service life and after demolition and reuse as gravel filling material. Concrete depletion, due to carbonation and the unavoidable steel embedded corrosion, is studied, as this process consequently ends the concrete service life. Carbonation deepens progressively during service life and captures CO2 even after demolition due to the greater exposed surface area. In this study, results are presented as a function of cement replaced by fly ash (FA) and blast furnace slag (BFS).
Results and discussion
Concrete made with Portland cement, FA (35 % FA), and BFS blended cements (80 % BFS) captures 47, 41, and 20 % of CO2 emissions, respectively. The service life of blended cements with high amounts of cement replacement, like CEM III/A (50 % BFS), CEM III/B (80 % BFS), and CEM II/B-V (35 % FA), was about 10 % shorter, given the higher carbonation rate coefficient. Compared to Portland cement and despite the reduced CO2 capture and service life, CEM III/B emitted 20 % less CO2 per year.
To obtain reliable results in a life cycle assessment, it is crucial to consider carbonation during use and after demolition. Replacing Portland cement with FA, instead of BFS, leads to a lower material emission factor, since FA needs less processing after being collected, and transport distances are usually shorter. However, greater reductions were achieved using BFS, since a larger amount of cement can be replaced. Blended cements emit less CO2 per year during the life cycle of a structure, although a high cement replacement reduces the service life notably. If the demolished concrete is crushed and recycled as gravel filling material, carbonation can cut CO2 emissions by half. A case study is presented in this paper demonstrating how the results may be utilized.
KeywordsBlended cement Carbonation CO2 emission Durability Life cycle Recycled concrete
- Berge B (2000) The ecology of building materials. Architectural Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Bertolini L, Elsener B, Pedeferri P, Polder R (2004) Corrosion of Steel in Concrete—Prevention Diagnosis. Repair, Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
- CEN (2011) EN 197–1: Cement. Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- CIWMB (2000) Designing with vision: a technical manual for materials choices in sustainable construction. California Integrated Waste Management Board, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
- Database BEDEC (2012) Institute of Construction Technology of Catalonia. Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
- ECO-SERVE Network Cluster 3 (2004) Baseline Report for the Aggregate and Concrete Industries in Europe. European Commission, Hellerup: http://www.eco-serve.net/uploads/479998_baseline_report_final.pdf, accessed 10 September 2012
- European Federation of Concrete Admixtures Associations (2006) Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Normal Plasticizing admixtures. Environmental Consultant, Sittard: http://www.efca.info/downloads/324%20ETG%20Plasticiser%20EPD.pdf, accessed 13 October 2012
- Galán I (2011) Carbonatación del hormigón: combinación de CO2. Dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
- Flower DJM, Sanjayan JG (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions due to concrete manufacture. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(5):282–288Google Scholar
- Institute for Diversification and Energy Saving (2010) Conversion factors of primary energy and CO2 emissions of 2010. M. Industria, Energía y Turismo, Madrid, Spain: http://www.idae.es/index.php/mod.documentos/mem.descarga?file=/documentos_Factores_Conversion_Energia_y_CO2_2010_0a9cb734.pdf, accessed 10 September 2012
- ISO (2005) ISO/TC 71—Business plan. Concrete, reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2006) ISO 14040: Environmental management—life-cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Lagerblad B (2005) Carbon dioxide uptake during concrete life-cycle: State of the art. Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
- Leber I, Blakey FA (1956) Some effects of carbon dioxide on mortars and concrete. J Am Concr Inst 53:295–308Google Scholar
- Fomento M (2008) EHE-08; Code of Structural Concrete. M. Fomento, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
- Papadakis VG, Vayenas CG, Fardis MN (1991) Fundamental modeling and experimental investigation of concrete carbonation. ACI Mater J 88(4):363–373Google Scholar
- The Concrete Centre (2009) The Concrete Industry Sustainability Performance Report. The Concrete Center, Camberley: http://www.admixtures.org.uk/downloads/Concrete%20Industry%20Sustainable%20Performance%20Report%202009.pdf, accessed 9 September 2012
- Tuutti K (1982) Corrosion of steel in Concrete. CBI Forskning Research Report, Swedish Cem Concr Res Inst. Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
- World Steel Association (2010) Fact sheet: the three Rs of sustainable Steel. World Steel Association, Brussels: http://www.steel.org/Sustainability/~/media/Files/SMDI/Sustainability/3rs.ashx, accessed 15 September 2012
- Yiwei T, Qun Z, Jian G (2011) Study on the Life-cycle Carbon Emission and Energy-efficiency Management of the Large-scale Public Buildings in Hangzho. China. International Conference on Computer and Management, Wuhan, pp 546–552Google Scholar