Life cycle cost analysis of the UK housing stock

  • Rosa M. Cuéllar-Franca
  • Adisa Azapagic



The aim of the paper is to estimate life cycle costs (LCC) of the current housing stock in the UK as part of sustainability assessment of the residential construction sector. This is carried out by first estimating the life cycle costs of individual houses considering detached, semi-detached and terraced homes. These results are then extrapolated to the UK housing stock consisting of seven million each of semi-detached and terraced houses and four million of detached houses. A brief discussion of life cycle environmental impacts is also included to help identify improvement opportunities for both costs and impacts.


The life cycle costing methodology followed in the study is congruent with the life cycle assessment methodology. The system boundary for the study is from ‘cradle to grave’, including all activities from extraction and manufacture of construction materials to construction and use of the house to its demolition. The functional unit is defined as the construction and occupation of a house in the UK over the lifetime of 50 years.

Results and discussion

The total life cycle costs are estimated at £247,000 for the detached house, £192,000 for the semi-detached and £142,000 for the terraced house. The running costs in the use stage contribute 52 % to the total life cycle costs of which half is from energy use. The construction costs contribute 35 % to the total LCC with the walls and the roof being the most expensive items. The remaining 13 % of the costs are incurred at the end of life of the house which are largely (85 %) due to the cost of labour for demolition. Recovery of end-of-life materials has a limited potential to reduce the overall life cycle costs of a house. The life cycle costs of the whole housing stock are estimated at £67 billion per year or £3,360 billion over the 50-year lifetime.


The existing housing stock in the UK is facing a number of challenges that will need to be addressed in the near future. These include improving energy efficiency and reducing the dependency on fossil fuels to reduce energy demand, fuel poverty and environmental impacts. Furthermore, the disparity between the construction costs and house market prices will need to be addressed to ensure that access to housing and house ownership do not become the privilege of a few.


Environmental impacts Fuel poverty House costs Life cycle costs Residential construction sector UK houses 



One of the authors (RCF) would like to thank CONACYT for their financial support.


  1. Abeysundra UGY, Babel S, Gheewala S, Sharp A (2007) Environmental, economic and social analysis of materials for doors and windows in Sri Lanka. Build Environ 42(5):2141–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adalberth K (1997) Energy use during the life cycle of single-unit dwellings: examples. Build Environ 32:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adalberth KA, Almgren A, Petersen EH (2001) Life cycle assessment of four multi-family buildings. Int J Low Energy Sustain Build 2:1–21Google Scholar
  4. Asif M, Muneer T, Kelley R (2007) Life cycle assessment: a case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Build Environ 42:1391–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balcombe P, Rigby D, Azapagic A (2013) Motivations and barriers associated with adopting microgeneration energy technologies in the UK. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22:655–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker T, Jenkins K (2007) The domestic energy sub-model in MDM-E3.
  7. BBC (2011) Diesel price reaches record high.
  8. BBC (2012) Home ownership in England continues gradual decline.
  9. Bolton P (2010) Energy price rises and fuel poverty. Key Issues for the New Parliament 2010, House of Commons Library Research.
  10. Bolton P (2012) Energy prices. House of Commons. Accessed: 2 Nov 2012
  11. Bribián IZ, Usón AA, Scarpellini S (2009) Life cycle assessment in buildings: state of the art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Build Environ 44:2510–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brinkley M (2008) The housebuilder’s bible, 7th edn. Ovolo, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. BRE (2011) Passivhaus primer: introduction (an aid to understand the key principles of the Passivhaus standard). Building Research Establishment, London.
  14. BS (2008) BS ISO 15686-5:2008. Buildings & construction assets—service life planning—Part 5: Life cycle costing. British StandardsGoogle Scholar
  15. BS (2012) BS EN 15643-4:2012. Sustainability of construction works—assessment of buildings. Part 4: Framework for the assessment of economic performanceGoogle Scholar
  16. BTP (2010) Blue print for Greenheys Great Western Street Moss Side. Elevations—setting out Block 8. Bernard Taylor Partnership Ltd.: ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  17. CRW (2009) Management of non-aggregated waste. Construction, Resource and Waste Platform, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A (2012) Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: life cycle assessment of houses. Build Environ 54:86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DCLG (2008) English Housing Survey: Housing stock report 2008. Department of Communities and Local Government.
  20. DCLG (2010) Code for sustainable homes: technical guide. Department of Communities and Local Governments. Available at:
  21. DCLG (2012) English Housing Survey: Households report 2010–11. Department of Communities and Local Government.
  22. DECC (2009) The fuel poverty strategy. Department of Energy and Climate Change, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. DECC (2010) Quaterly energy prices. Department of Energy and Climate Change, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. DECC (2011a) Retail price index: fuel components, monthly figures.
  25. DECC (2011b) Annual report on fuel poverty statistics 2011. Department of Climate Change, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. DECC (2012a) Feed-in-Tariffs. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.
  27. DECC (2012b) Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) scheme. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.
  28. DECC (2012c) Feed-in-Tariffs scheme. Government response to Consultation on Comprehensive Review Phase 2A: Solar PV cost control. Department of Energy and Climate Change, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. DEFRA (2010) Sustainable consumption and production: domestic water consumption. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.£.pdf
  30. Dewulf J, Van der Vorst G, Versele N, Janssens A, Van Langenhove H (2009) Quantification of the impact of the end-of-life scenario on the overall resource consumption for a dwelling house. Resources, conservation and recycling 53(4):231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. EcoInvent (2011) Ecoinvent Centre, Zurich.
  32. EST (2010) F & G banded homes in Great Britain - research into costs of treatment. Energy Saving Trust, London.
  33. Eurostat (2012) European Union statistics on income and living standards. European Commission.
  34. FF (2011) Wood chipper hire.
  35. Gluch P, Baumann H (2004) The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Build Environ 39:571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hacker JN, De Saulles TP, Minson AJ, Holmes MJ (2008) Embodied and operational carbon dioxide emissions from housing: a case study on the effects of thermal mass and climate change. Energ Build 40(3):375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hammond G, Jones C (2008) Embodied energy and carbon of construction materials. Proc ICE: Energy 161:87–98Google Scholar
  38. Hasan A, Vuolle M, Sirén K (2008) Minimisation of life cycle cost of a detached house using combined simulation and optimisation. Build Environ 43(12):2022–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. HC (2008) Construction matters. House of Commons Business and Enterprise Committee. Http://
  40. HMRC (2011) A general guide to landfill tax. HM Revenue & Customs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. HPUK (2012) House prices.
  42. Hunkeler D, Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G (2007) Environmental life cycle costing. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Hutchins (2010) UK building blackbook: the small works and maintenance construction cost guide. Vol. 1. Franklin and Andrews, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. ISO (2006a) ISO 14040—Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  45. ISO (2006b) ISO 14044—Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  46. Keoleian GA, Blanchard S, Reppe P (2000) Life-cycle energy, costs, and strategies for improving a single-family house. J Ind Ecol 4(2):135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kohler N, Davies S (2007) Demolition exemplar case study: recycling demolition arisings at Hamilton House, Sandwell. Waste Resource Action Programme, Oxon.
  48. Monahan J, Powell JC (2011) An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: a case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energ Build 43:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. MTP (2008) Domestic water consumption in domestic and non-domestic properties. Market Transformation Programme.
  50. OFWAT (2010) Annual report 2010–11. Water Services Regulation Authority.
  51. Ortiz O, Bonnet C, Bruno JC, Castells F (2009) Sustainability based on LCM of residential dwellings: a case study in Catalonia, Spain. Build Environ 44:584–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peuportier BLP (2001) Life cycle assessment applied to the comparative evaluation of single family houses in the French context. Energ Build 33:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rebitzer G, Hunkeler D, Jolliet O (2003) LCC—The economic pillar of sustainability: methodology and application to wastewater treatment. Environ Prog 22(4):241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. RICS (2012) RICS UK Housing market survey. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
  55. Sergeant M (2011) Home ownership set to fall in UK. BBC News.
  56. SilverCrest (2010) Disposal of construction waste. Franco RC (ed). DerbyshireGoogle Scholar
  57. Swarr TE, Hunkeler D, Klöpffer W, Pesonen H-L, Ciroth A, Brent AC, Pagan R (2011) Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:389–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. UKCG (2009) Construction in the UK economy: the benefits of investment. UK Contractors Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Utley J, Shorrock L (2008) Domestic energy fact file. Building Research Establishment, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. VADO (2010) Grey water recycling and rain water harvesting. VADO and Hydrocyc UK.
  61. World Bank (2012) UK GDP for 2011.
  62. Zenith (2011) PE Series Jaw Crusher. Zenith Mining and Construction

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical ScienceThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations