Life cycle assessment of potential energy uses for short rotation willow biomass in Sweden
- 1.1k Downloads
Two different bioenergy systems using willow chips as raw material has been assessed in detail applying life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to compare its environmental profile with conventional alternatives based on fossil fuels and demonstrate the potential of this biomass as a lignocellulosic energy source.
Short rotation forest willow plantations dedicated to biomass chips production for energy purposes and located in Southern Sweden were considered as the agricultural case study. The bioenergy systems under assessment were based on the production and use of willow-based ethanol in a flexi fuel vehicle blended with gasoline (85 % ethanol by volume) and the direct combustion of willow chips in an industrial furnace in order to produce heat for end users. The standard framework for LCA from the International Standards Organisation was followed in this study. The environmental profiles as well as the hot spots all through the life cycles were identified.
Results and discussion
According to the results, Swedish willow biomass production is energetically efficient, and the destination of this biomass for energy purposes (independently the sort of energy) presents environmental benefits, specifically in terms of avoided greenhouse gases emissions and fossil fuels depletion. Several processes from the agricultural activities were identified as hot spots, and special considerations should be paid on them due to their contribution to the environmental impact categories under analysis. This was the case for the production and use of the nitrogen-based fertilizer, as well as the diesel used in agricultural machineries.
Special attention should be paid on diffuse emissions from the ethanol production plant as well as on the control system of the combustion emissions from the boiler.
KeywordsBiomass Bioenergy Ethanol Gasoline Heat production LCA Natural gas Salix spp
Dr. S. González-García would like to express her gratitude to the Spanish Ministry of Education for financial support (Grant reference: EX2009-0740) for a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship taken at Imperial College London (UK), during which this paper was prepared.
- Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheenhan J, Wallace B, Montague L, Slayton A, Lukas J (2002) Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL/TP-510-32438. ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- Althaus HJ, Chudacoff M, Hischier R, Jungbluth N, Osses M, Primas A (2007) Life cycle inventories of chemicals. Ecoinvent report No. 8, v2.0. EMPA Dübendorf, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. DübendorfGoogle Scholar
- Defra (2009) Experimental statistics non food crop areas in the United Kingdom. 15 ppGoogle Scholar
- Dones R, Bauer C, Bolliger R, Burger B, Faist Emmenegger M, Frischknecht R, Heck T, Jungbluth N, Röder A, Tuchschmid M (2007) Life cycle inventories of energy systems: results for current systems in Switzerland and other UCTE countries. Ecoinvent report No. 5. Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, DübendorfGoogle Scholar
- Union E (2003) Directive 2003/30/EC of the European parliament and of the council, on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport. May 8:2003Google Scholar
- Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, De Koning A, Van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, De Bruijn H, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. I: LCA in perspective. IIa: Guide. IIb: Operational annex. III: Scientific background. Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 1-4020-0228-9, Dordrecht, 692 ppGoogle Scholar
- Humbird D, Davis R, Tao L, Kinchin C, Hsu D, Aden A, Schoen P, Lukas J, Olthof B, Worley M, Sexton D, Dudgeon D (2011) Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. NREL/TP-5100-47764. ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and frameworkGoogle Scholar
- Joyce PJ (2010) Using scenario-based life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the present and future environmental impact of bioethanol production from genetically improved poplar wood in the EU. Master Thesis. Imperial College London, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Kelly KJ, Bailey BK, Coburn TC, Clark W, Lissiuk P (1996) Federal test procedure emissions test results from ethanol variable-fuel vehicle Chevrolet Luminas, Society for Automotive Engineers International Spring Fuels and Lubricants meetingGoogle Scholar
- Kreith G, Goswami DY (2007) Handbook of energy efficiency and renewable energy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
- Lechón Y, Cabal H, Sáez R (2005) Life cycle analysis of wheat and barley crops for bioethanol production in Spain. Int J Agric Resour Gov Ecol 4:113–122Google Scholar
- Lillieblad L, Szpila A, Strand M, Pagels J, Rupar-Gadd K, Gudmundsson A, Swietlicki E, Bohgard M, Sanati M (2004) Boiler operation influence on the emissions of submicrometer-sized particles and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from biomass-fired grate boilers. Energ Fuel 18:410–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mola-Yudego B (2010a) Regional potential yields of short rotation willow plantations on agricultural land in Northern Europe. Silva Fennica 44:63–76Google Scholar
- Reading AH, Norris JOW, Feest EA, Payne EL (2002) Ethanol emissions testing, AEAT unclassified, E&E/DDSE/02/021, 3Google Scholar
- Statistics Sweden (2007) Arable land, hectares by crop and period; Energy forest. Retrieved at: http://www.scb.se/ (cited 21 November 2012)