Life cycle assessment of the supply chain of a Portuguese wine: from viticulture to distribution

LCA FOR FOOD PRODUCTS

Abstract

Purpose

This paper performs a life cycle assessment study for a white wine produced in the northern part of Portugal, i.e. the white vinho verde. The purpose is to identify the environmental impacts occurring along the wine life cycle as well as the stages that mostly contribute to the environmental impact, as well as the associated causes. The stages considered include: (1) viticulture, (2) wine production (vinification to storage), (3) wine distribution and (4) bottles production.

Methods

The consumption of materials and energy, as well as the emissions to air, soil and water from the wine campaign of 2008/2009 were reported to the functional unit (0.75 l of white vinho verde). A Portuguese company that produces about 25 % of the current total production of white vinho verde supplied specific life cycle data for the stages of viticulture, wine production and distribution. SimaPro and the Ecoinvent database were used to perform the environmental assessment using CML 2001 impact methodology. A sensitivity analysis for a set of significant parameters was performed.

Results

Results show that for viticulture the contribution of each impact category is larger than 50 %. The production of bottles is the second contributor varying from about 4 % (to eutrophication) to 26 % (to acidification). Wine production and distribution are the subsequent contributors. The contribution of wine production varies between 0.6 % (to land competition) and about 13 % (from marine aquatic and sediment ecotoxicity 100a). The contribution of distribution is up to 14 % (to photochemical oxidation). Sensitivity analysis shows that significant changes are calculated for parameters as the nitrate leaching to groundwater, the emission of nitrous oxide from managed soil, and from runoff and leaching. Changes in these parameters are significant for only a few impact categories as eutrophication and global warming.

Conclusions

Viticulture is the stage with the largest relative contribution to the overall environmental impact and the bottle production is the subsequent stage. In order to improve the environmental performance of the supply chain for wine, it is necessary to optimise the dosage of fertilisers and phytosanitary products used during viticulture. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the most influential parameters relate with the emission of nitrogen compounds associated with the use of fertilisers.

Keywords

Distribution Fertilisers Life cycle assessment (LCA) Phytosanitary products Viticulture White wine 

References

  1. APA (Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente) (2011) Embalagens e Resíduos de embalagens. Situação de referência 2004–2010 (in Portuguese) Departamento de Fluxos Especiais e Mercado de Resíduos. Divisão de Entidade Gestoras e Mercado de Resíduos Available in http://www.apambiente.pt/_zdata/Politicas/Residuos/FluxosEspecificosResiduos/ERE/SituacaoReferenciaERE.pdf. Accessed Sep 2012
  2. Aranda A, Scarpellini S, Zabalza I (2005) Economic and environmental analysis of the wine bottle production in Spain by means of life cycle assessment. Int J Agric Resour Gov Ecol 4(2):178–191Google Scholar
  3. Ardente F, Beccali G, Cellura M, Marvuglia A (2006) POEMS: a case study of an Italian wine-producing firm. Environ Manag 38(3):350–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audsley E (1997) Harmonization of environmental life cycle assessment for agriculture. European Commission DG VI Agriculture. Silsoe Research Institute, SilsoeGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosco S, Di Bene C, Galli M, Remorini D, Massai R, Bonari E (2011) Greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural phase of wine production in the Maremma rural district in Tuscany, Italy. Ital J Agron 6(e15):93–100Google Scholar
  6. CVRVV (Comissão de Viticultura da Região dos Vinhos Verdes) (2011) Statistics of production and exportation of vinho verde. Available in http://www.vinhoverde.pt/en/. Accessed Jan 2012
  7. Ecoinvent (2011) Ecoinvent (database ecoinvent data v.2.2) available in http://www.ecoinvent.ch/
  8. EMEP/EEA (2009) 4.G—Agriculture other (use of pesticides and limestone). In Air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2009—technical report no 9/2009. European Environment Agency: CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  9. EPD (2008a) Environmental product declaration. Bottled red sparkling wine. “Grasparossa Righi, validated environmental product declaration No S-P-00109. Available in http://gryphon.environdec.com/data/files/6/7505/EPD%20S-P-00109%20ingl-2008-def.pdf. Accessed Sep 2012
  10. EPD (2008b) Environmental product declaration. Bottled organic Lambrusco Grasparossa red sparkling wine “Fratello Sole”. Available in http://gryphon.environdec.com/data/files/6/7521/EPD_Fratello%20Sole_english%202008-def.pdf. Validated environmental product declaration No S-P-00119. Accessed Sep 2012
  11. Gazulla C, Raugei M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2010) Taking a life cycle look at crianza wine production in Spain: where are the bottlenecks? Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonzalez A, Klimchuck A, Martin M (2006) Life cycle assessment of wine production process: finding relevant process efficiency and comparison to eco-wine production. Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Infrastructure. Life Cycle Assessment Course (1 N1800). Stockholm, KTH-Royal Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  13. Hauschild M (2000) Estimating pesticide emissions for LCA of agricultural products. In: Weidema BP, Meeusen MJG (eds) Agricultural data for life cycle assessments, volume 1. Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), The HagueGoogle Scholar
  14. IEPDS (The International Environmental Product Declaration System) (2011) Product category rules. CPC Subclass 24212. Wine of fresh grapes, except sparkling; grape must. PCR 2010:02, version 1.01. Available in http://www.environdec.com/en/Product-Category-Rules/Detail/?Pcr=5850. Accessed Sep 2012
  15. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006a) In 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Inventories. Vol.4: Agriculture, forestry and other land use, chapter 11: N2O emissions from managed soils, and co2 emissions from lime and urea. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) N2O Emissions from managed soils and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. Published by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), HayamaGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006b) In 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Inventories. Vol.2: Energy. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) Stationary combustion. Published by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), HayamaGoogle Scholar
  17. IVV (Instituto da Vinha e do Vinho) (2010) Portuguese statistics for wine production and exportation. Available in http://www.ivv.min-agricultura.pt/np4/home.html. Accessed Sep 2011
  18. Machado M (2011) Modelling the life cycle of vinho verde and wine cork stoppers through the use of several impact assessment methods (in Portuguese). Master thesis dissertation in Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Porto University, PortoGoogle Scholar
  19. Margni M, Rossier D, Crettaz P, Jolliet O (2002) Life cycle impact assessment of pesticides on human health and ecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93:379–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milà i Canals L (2003) Contributions to LCA methodology for agricultural systems. Site-dependency and soil degradation impact assessment. PhD thesis in Environmental Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona. Available in http://www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-1222103-154811/. Accessed Oct 2011
  21. Nemecek T, Kägi T (2007) Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Ecoinvent report no. 15. ART Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Notarnicola B, Tassielli G, Nicolett M (2003) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of wine production. In: Mattson B, Sonesson U (eds) Environmentally friendly food processing. Woodhead, Cambridge, pp 306–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. OIV (International Organisation of Vine and Wine) (2010) Statistics of production and exportation. Available in http://www.oiv.int/oiv/cms/index. Accessed Sep 2011
  24. Petti L, Raggi A, Camillis C, Matteucci P, Sára B, Pagliuca G (2006) Life cycle approach in organic wine-making firm: an Italian case study. 5th Australian Conference on Life Cycle Assessment. Australian Life Cycle Assessment Society. MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  25. Peynaud E (1981) Conhecer e trabalhar o vinho (in Portuguese). Biblioteca Agrícola Litexa, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  26. Pizzigallo A, Granai C, Borsa S (2008) The joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms. J Environ Manag 86(2):396–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Point E, Tyedmers P, Naugler C (2012) Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada. J Clean Prod 27:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Santos AM (2010) Life Cycle Assessment of vinho verde (in Portuguese). Master thesis dissertation in Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Porto University, PortoGoogle Scholar
  29. SimaPro software (2011) website at http://www.pre.nl
  30. Soares M (1998) Implementação e estudo de vários métodos de determinação do CO2 dissolvido em vinhos (in Portuguese). Licenciatura em Enologia. Universidade de Trás-os-Montes, Vila RealGoogle Scholar
  31. Vázquez-Rowe IP, Villanueva-Rey P, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012) Environmental analysis of Ribeiro wine from a timeline perspective: harvest year matters when reporting environmental impacts. J Environ Manag 98:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Belmira Neto
    • 1
  • Ana Cláudia Dias
    • 2
  • Marina Machado
    • 3
  1. 1.CEMUC, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Department of Environment and PlanningUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  3. 3.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations