Attributional life cycle assessment (ALCA) of polyitaconic acid production from northeast US softwood biomass
- 681 Downloads
Shifting the resource base for chemical and energy production from fossil feed stocks to renewable raw materials is seen by many as one of the key strategies towards sustainable development. The objective of this study is to assess the environmental burdens of producing polyitaconic acid (PIA), a water-soluble polymer derived from itaconic acid identified by the US Department of Energy as one of the top 12 value added chemicals from northeast (NE) US softwood biomass. Results are compared to corn-derived PIA and fossil-based poly acrylic acid (PAA) on the basis of 1 kg of polymer at the factory gate.
This study uses attributional life cycle assessment to quantify global warming potential (GWP), fossil energy demand (CED), acidification, eutrophication, water use, and land occupation of the polymer production routes. This includes feedstock growth and harvest, sugar extraction, fermentation, itaconic acid recovery, and subsequent polymerization. Foreground data for softwood-derived PIA comes from lab- and pilot plant runs undertaken by Itaconix LLC.
Results and discussion
Results indicate that the use of softwood-based PIA may be advantageous in terms of GWP, CED, and acidification when compared to both, the integrated corn biorefinery and fossil-based PAA production. When looking at impacts to eutrophication and water use, the use of softwood leads to lower potential impacts compared to its corn-based counterpart but to higher impacts when compared to fossil-based PAA. Land occupation, to a large extent, due to lower yields and longer growth cycles associated with softwood growth in the NE, is highest for softwood-derived PIA and lowest for fossil-based PAA. Environmental impacts are mainly the results of onsite electricity use, inputs of activated carbon and sodium hydroxide, as well as water use during sugar extraction and fermentation. Assumptions with regards to allocation, activated carbon inputs, and electricity mixes to processes of the foreground system are tested in a sensitivity analysis.
Wood-derived PIA production may be an interesting alternative to current fossil-based pathways and could contribute to a future biobased economy. However, currently, land occupation, water use, and eutrophication are high when compared to traditional PAA production. The use of short rotation crops or waste feedstocks and optimization with regards to water requirements and reuse should be investigated to further lower system-wide impacts.
KeywordsBiopolymers Corn feedstock Integrated biorefinery Life cycle assessment (LCA) Polyacrylic acid Polyitaconic acid Softwood biomass Stream-integrated process
The authors are grateful to Yvon Durant and staff at Itaconix LLC for providing process data and assisting with the LCI analysis. We also would like to thank DOE-USDA (grant no. 2009-10006-06046) for funding the LCA task of the project and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
- Althaus H-J, Hischier R, Osses M, Primas A, Hellweg S, Jungbluth N, Chudacoff M (2007a) Life cycle inventories of chemicals data v2.0. Ecoinvent Centre. ETH Zurich, DübendorfGoogle Scholar
- Althaus H-J, Werner F, Stettler C (2007b) Life cycle inventories of renewable materials data v2.0. Ecoinvent Centre. ETH Zurich, DübendorfGoogle Scholar
- Amidon TE (2006) The biorefinery in New York: woody biomass into commercial ethanol. Pulp Pap-Can 6(107):47–50Google Scholar
- Bauer C, Bolliger R, Tuchschmidt M, Faist-Emmenegger M (2007) “Wasserkraft.” Sachbilanzen von energiesystemen: grundlagen fuer den oekologischen Vergleich von Energiesystemen und den Einbezug von Energiesystemen in Oekoblianzen fuer die Schweiz, Ecoinvent Report No. 6-VIII (In German), R. Dones, ed., Paul Scherrer Institute Villigen, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, SwitzerlanGoogle Scholar
- Benjamin J, Lilieholm RJ, Damery D (2009) Challenges and opportunities for the northeastern forest bioindustry. J For 107(3):125–131Google Scholar
- Ecoinvent (2010) Ecoinvent life cycle inventory database v2.2. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle InventoriesGoogle Scholar
- US Forest Service (2010) Forest Inventory and Analysis National Program—tools and data. http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/tools-data/default.asp. Accessed on: 27 Dec 2010
- Goedkoop M, Oele M, de Schryver A, Vieira M (2008) SimaPro database manual—methods library. PRé Consultants, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008, a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level; First edition Report I: Characterisation. (www.lcia-recipe.net)
- Itaconix, LLC (2009) The development of integrated production of polyitaconic acid from Northeast hardwood biomass. Grant Project Proposal, Itaconix, LLC, (Principal); Microbia, Inc.; University of MaineGoogle Scholar
- Itaconix, LLC (2010) Technical datasheet: ITACONIX™ Dispersant DSP2KGoogle Scholar
- Jungbluth N, Chudacoff M, Dauriat A, Dinkel F, Doka G, Emmenegger MF, Gnansounou E, Kljun N, Schleiss K, Spielmann M, Stettler C, Sutter J (2007) Life cycle inventories of bioenergy. Ecoinvent report no.17. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, DübendorfGoogle Scholar
- Kamm B, Gruber PR, Kamm M (2006) Biorefineries—industrial processes and products: status quo and future directions, volume 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- ISO New England (2010) 2010 Regional System Plan (www.iso-ne.com)
- Nielsen PH, Oxenbøll KM, Wenzel H (2006) Cradle-to-gate environmental assessment of enzyme products produced industrially in denmark by novozymes A/S. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(6):432–438Google Scholar
- NREL (2008) U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database (U.S. LCI), v1.6.0. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)Google Scholar
- Oneil EE, Johnson LR, Lippke BR, McCarter JB, McDill ME, Roth PA (2010) Life-cycle impacts of Inland Northwest and Northeast/North Central Forest Resources. 42(CORRIM Special Issue), pp. 29–51Google Scholar
- Smith WB, Miles PD, Perry CH, Pugh SA (2009) Forest Resources of the United States, 2007. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-78. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office, Washington, p 336Google Scholar
- US EPA (2011) Chapter 9: food and agricultural industries, AP 42, fifth edition, volume I. Office of Air Quality Planning and StandardsGoogle Scholar
- USDA (2011) Agricultural marketing service—market news and transportation data. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?startIndex=1&template=TemplateW&page=SearchFeedstuffsReports. 6 Jul 2011
- Walker T (2010) Massachusetts Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study: report to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources. Natural Capital Initiative Report. Manomet Center for Conservation Science, BrunswickGoogle Scholar
- Werner F, Althaus H-J, Kuenninger T, Richter K, Jungbluth N (2007) Life cycle inventories of wood as fuel and construction material—data v2.0. Dübendorf: SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Werpy T, Petersen G (2004) Top value added chemicals from biomass, volume 1: results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)Google Scholar