Principles for life cycle inventories of land use on a global scale
To assess the diverse environmental impacts of land use, a standardization of quantifying land use elementary flows is needed in life cycle assessment (LCA). The purpose of this paper is to propose how to standardize the land use classification and how to regionalize land use elementary flows.
Materials and methods
In life cycle inventories, land occupation and transformation are elementary flows providing relevant information on the type and location of land use for land use impact assessment. To find a suitable land use classification system for LCA, existing global land cover classification systems and global approaches to define biogeographical regions are reviewed.
Results and discussion
A new multi-level classification of land use is presented. It consists of four levels of detail ranging from very general global land cover classes to more refined categories and very specific categories indicating land use intensities. Regionalization is built on five levels, first distinguishing between terrestrial, freshwater, and marine biomes and further specifying climatic regions, specific biomes, ecoregions and finally indicating the exact geo-referenced information of land use. Current land use inventories and impact assessment methods do not always match and hinder a comprehensive assessment of land use impact. A standardized definition of land use types and geographic location helps to overcome this gap and provides the opportunity to test the optimal resolution of land cover types and regionalization for each impact pathway.
Conclusions and recommendation
The presented approach provides the necessary flexibility to providers of inventories and developers of impact assessment methods. To simplify inventories and impact assessment methods of land use, we need to find archetypical situations across impact pathways, land use types and regions, and aggregate inventory entries and methods accordingly.
KeywordsGlobal Land cover Life cycle assessment Regionalization
The authors wish to thank the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative for the financial support of this work under the project Operational Characterization Factors for Land Use Impacts on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LULCIA). The research was partly funded by the European Commission under the seventh framework program on environment; ENV.2009.3.3.2.1: LCIMPACT–Improved Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods (LCIA) for better sustainability assessment of technologies, grant agreement number 243827.
- Arino O, Gross D, Ranera F, Leroy M, Bicheron P, Brockman C, Defourny P, Vancutsem C, Achard F, Durieux L, Bourg L, Latham J, Gregorio AD, Witt R, Herold M, Sambale J, Plummer S, Weber J (2007) GlobCover: ESA service for global land cover from MERIS. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2412-2415Google Scholar
- Beck T, Bos U, Wittstock B, Baitz M, Fischer M, Sedlbauer K (2010) LANCA—land use indicator value calculation in life cycle assessment. Fraunhofer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- de Schryver A, Goedkoop M (2008) Impact of land use in M. Goedkoop , R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. De Schryver, J. Struijs, R. van Zelm, eds. ReCiPe. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicatorsat the midpoint and the endpoint level, Online at http://www.lcia-recipe.net/@api/deki/files/11/=ReCiPe_main_report_final_27-02-2009_web.pdf
- Di Gregorio A, Jansen LJM (2005) Land Cover Classification System (LCCS) classification concepts and user manual. Environment and Natural Resources Service (SDRN), Food and Agricultura Organisation of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
- European Environmental Agency (2000) CORINE Land Cover. European Environmental Agency, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N (eds) (2007) Ecoinvent: overview and methodology. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, DuebendorfGoogle Scholar
- Koellner T (2003) Land use in product life cycles and ecosystem quality. Peter Lang, Bern, Frankfurt a. M., New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Koellner T, Scholz R (2008a) Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment. Part 2: Generic characterization factors for local species diversity in Central Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:32–48Google Scholar
- Koellner T, Scholz RW (2008b) Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment. Appendix: CORINE Plus land-cover definitions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:48-1–48-3Google Scholar
- Koellner T, de Baan L, Beck T, Brandão M, Civit B, Margni M, Milà i Canals L, Saad R, Maia de Souza D, Müller-Wenk R (2012) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess (this issue)Google Scholar
- Milà i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Freiermuth Knuchel R, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Müller-Wenk R, Rydgren B (2007) Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12. doi: 5
- Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D'Amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51:933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weidema B, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2011) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Ecoinvent Report 1(v3). The ecoinvent Centre, St. GallenGoogle Scholar