Life cycle assessment of energy and GHG emissions during ethanol production from grass straws using various pretreatment processes

LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to perform a well-to-pump life cycle assessment (LCA) to investigate the overall net energy balance and environmental impact of bioethanol production using Tall Fescue grass straw as feedstock. The energy requirements and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were compared to those of gasoline to explore the potential of bioethanol as sustainable fuel.

Methods

The functional unit used in the study was 10,000 MJ of energy. The data for grass seed production were collected from the farmers in Oregon and published reports. The compositions of straw, pretreatment, and hydrolysis yields were obtained from laboratory experiments. Process models were developed for ethanol production using different pretreatment technologies in SuperPro Designer to calculate the process energy, raw materials, utility use, and emissions related. The Greenhouse Gases Regulated Emissions and Energy use in Transportation model and other literature studies were used to obtain additional data. Systematic boundary identification was performed using relative mass, energy, and economic value method using a 5% cutoff value.

Results and discussion

Ethanol yields from grass straw were estimated 256.62, 255.8, 255.3, and 230.2 L/dry metric ton of biomass using dilute acid, dilute alkali, hot water, and steam explosion pretreatments, respectively. Fossil energy required to produce one functional unit was in the range of −1507 to 3940 MJ for different ethanol production techniques. GHG emissions from ethanol LCA models were in the range of −131 to −555.4 kg CO2 eq. per 10,000 MJ of ethanol. Fossil energy use and GHG emissions during ethanol production were found to be lowest for steam explosion pretreatment among all pretreatment processes evaluated. Change in coproduct allocation from economic to mass basis during agricultural production resulted in 62.4% and 133.1% increase in fossil energy use and GHG emissions respectively.

Conclusions

Technologies used for ethanol production process had major impact on total fossil energy use and GHG emissions. N2O emissions from the nitrogen fertilizers were major contributor (77%) of total GHG emissions produced during agricultural activities. There was 57.43–112.67% reduction in fossil energy use to produce 10,000 MJ of ethanol compared to gasoline; however, about 0.35 ha of land is also required to produce this energy.

Keywords

E85 Grass straw Greenhouse gases Lignocellulosic ethanol Net energy Process model 

References

  1. Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, Wallace J, Montague L, Slayton A, Lukas J (2002) Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL/TP-510-32438. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai Y, Luo L, van der Voet E (2010) Life cycle assessment of switchgrass-derived ethanol as transport fuel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(5):468–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballesteros I, Negro MJ, Oliva JM, Cabañas A, Manzanares P, Ballesteros M (2006) Ethanol production from steam-explosion pretreated wheat straw. Appl Biochem Biotech 130(1–3):496–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banowetz GM, Boateng A, Steiner JJ, Griffith SM, Sethi V, El-Nashaar H (2008) Assessment of straw biomass feedstock resources in the Pacific Northwest. Biomass Bioenergy 32(7):629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barta Z, Reczey K, Zacchi G (2010) Techno-economic evaluation of stillage treatment with anaerobic digestion in a softwood-to-ethanol process. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bossel U (2003) Well-to-wheel studies, heating values, and the energy conservation principle. European Fuel Cell Forum, OberrohrdorfGoogle Scholar
  7. Brander M, Tipper R, Hutchison C, Davis G (2009) Consequential and attributional approaches to LCA: a guide to policy makers with specific reference to greenhouse gas LCA of biofuels. Technical paper TP-090403-A, Ecometrica Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan L, Owende P (2010) Biofuels from microalgae—a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(2):557–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Keshwani D, Chen C (2007) Potential of agricultural residues and hay for bioethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 142(3):276–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. da Costa SL, Chundawat SPS, Balan V, Dale BE (2009) Cradle-to-grave assessment of existing lignocellulose pretreatment technologies. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20(3):339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dale BE (2007) Thinking clearly about biofuels: ending the irrelevant ‘net energy’debate and developing better performance metrics for alternative fuels. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 1(1):14–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eggeman T, Elander RT (2005) Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies. Biores Technol 96(18):2019–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graf A, Koehler T (2002) Oregon cellulose–ethanol study. Oregon Office of Energy, SalemGoogle Scholar
  14. GREET (2010) The greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation model. Argonne National Laboratory, US Department of Energy. http://greet.es.anl.gov/main. Version 1.8d. Accessed January 10, 2011
  15. Hamelinck CN, Hooijdonk G, Faaij APC (2005) Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy 28(4):384–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu Z, Wen Z (2008) Enhancing enzymatic digestibility of switchgrass by microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment. Biochem Eng J 38(3):369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kazi FK, Fortman JA, Anex RP, Hsu DD, Aden A, Dutta A, Kothandaraman G (2010) Techno-economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn stover. Fuel 89:S20–S28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim S, Dale BE (2002) Allocation procedure in ethanol production system from corn grain I. system expansion. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(4):237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim S, Dale BE (2005) Environmental aspects of ethanol derived from no-tilled corn grain: nonrenewable energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 28(5):475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim S, Dale BE, Jenkins R (2009) Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(2):160–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar D, Murthy G (2011a) Impact of pretreatment and downstream processing technologies on economics, energy and water use in cellulosic ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar D, Murthy G (2011b) Pretreatments and enzymatic hydrolysis of grass straws for ethanol production in the Pacific Northwest US. Biol Eng 3(2):97–110Google Scholar
  23. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P (2009) Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(8):3713–3729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laser M, Jin H, Jayawardhana K, Lynd LR (2009) Coproduction of ethanol and power from switchgrass. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 3(2):195–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Linde M, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2007) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated barley straw at low enzyme loadings and low yeast concentration. Enzyme Microb Technol 40(5):1100–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lloyd TA, Wyman CE (2005) Combined sugar yields for dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the remaining solids. Biores Technol 96(18):1967–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luo L, Van der Voet E, Huppes G (2009a) An energy analysis of ethanol from cellulosic feedstock—corn stover. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(8):2003–2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo L, van der Voet E, Huppes G, Udo de Haes HA (2009b) Allocation issues in LCA methodology: a case study of corn stover-based fuel ethanol. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(6):529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacLean HL, Spatari S (2009) The contribution of enzymes and process chemicals to the life cycle of ethanol. Environ Res Lett 4:014001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mani S, Sokhansanj S, Tagore S, Turhollow A (2010) Techno-economic analysis of using corn stover to supply heat and power to a corn ethanol plant-Part 2: Cost of heat and power generation systems. Biomass Bioenerg 34(3):356–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch MR (2005a) Optimization of pH controlled liquid hot water pretreatment of corn stover. Biores Technol 96(18):1986–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee Y, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005b) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biores Technol 96(6):673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH (2008) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oregon Agricultural Enterprise Budgets (2010) http://arec.oregonstate.edu/oaeb/. Accessed April 10, 2011
  35. Prasad SB (1995) Biomass-fired steam power cogeneration system: a theoretical study. Energ Convers Manage 36(1):65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raynolds M, Fraser R, Checkel D (2000) The relative mass-energy-economic (RMEE) method for system boundary selection Part 1: A means to systematically and quantitatively select LCA boundaries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(1):37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sander K, Murthy GS (2010) Life cycle analysis of algae biodiesel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(7):704–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmer M, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK (2008) Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(2):464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt JH (2008) System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):350–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sheehan J, Aden A, Paustian K, Killian K, Brenner J, Walsh M, Nelson R (2003) Energy and environmental aspects of using corn stover for fuel ethanol. J Ind Ecol 7(34):117–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Tagore S, Turhollow A (2010) Techno-economic analysis of using corn stover to supply heat and power to a corn ethanol plant. Part 1: cost of feedstock supply logistics. Biomass Bioenerg 34(1):75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spatari S, Bagley DM, MacLean HL (2010) Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. Biores Technol 101(2):654–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spatari S, Zhang Y, MacLean HL (2005) Life cycle assessment of switchgrass-and corn stover-derived ethanol-fueled automobiles. Environ Sci Technol 39(24):9750–9758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steiner J, Griffith S, Mueller-Warrant G, Whittaker G, Banowetz G, Elliott L (2006) Conservation practices in western Oregon perennial grass seed systems. I. Impacts of direct seeding and maximal residue management on production. Agron J 98:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Biores Technol 83(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun Y, Cheng JJ (2005) Dilute acid pretreatment of rye straw and bermudagrass for ethanol production. Biores Technol 96(14):1599–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2007) Enzymatic-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: a review. Bio Resources 2(4):707–738Google Scholar
  48. Teymouri F, Laureano-Pérez L, Alizadeh H, Dale BE (2004) Ammonia fiber explosion treatment of corn stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 115(1):951–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang M (2005) Updated energy and greenhouse gas emission results of fuel ethanol. In: The 15th Int Symp Alcohol Fuels, San Diego, CA, SUAGoogle Scholar
  50. White JG (2000) Oregon perspectives on cellulose-to-ethanol. Oregon Office of Energy. http://www.nrbp.org/papers/029.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2011
  51. Wu M, Wu Y, Wang M (2006) Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment. Biotechnol Prog 22(4):1012–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wyman C (1996) Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization. Taylor & Francis, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  53. Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee Y (2005) Comparative sugar recovery data from laboratory scale application of leading pretreatment technologies to corn stover. Biores Technol 96(18):2026–2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu J (2011) Alkaline pretreatment of switchgrass for ethanol production. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, RaleighGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biological and Ecological EngineeringOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations