Advertisement

2nd International Seminar in Social Life Cycle Assessment—recent developments in assessing the social impacts of product life cycles

  • Catherine MacombeEmail author
  • Pauline Feschet
  • Michel Garrabé
  • Denis Loeillet
CONFERENCE REPORT

Introduction

The 2nd International Seminar in Social Life Cycle Assessment was held on 5 and 6 May 2010 in Montpellier (Agropolis International). It was the follow-up of the first seminar held in Lyngby at Denmark Technology University on 31 May 2010, initiated by Dr. Louise Camilla Dreyer. The second seminar was co-organised by four French institutions: CIRAD (http://www.cirad.fr/), Cemagref (http://www.cemagref.fr/), Université Montpellier 1 (http://www.univ-montp1.fr/ ) and ELSA (http://www.elsa-lca.org/) with the support of Agropolis International (http://www.agropolis.fr/), the Compagnie Fruitière (http://www.fruitiere.fr ), the Plateforme ecotech-LR (http://www.ecotech-lr.org/) and Ecotool—FP7—Marie Curie Action—International Research Staff Exchange Scheme. The focus of the second seminar was on the scientific questions involved in developing methods to assess the social impacts caused by the functioning of product chains.

As during the first seminar, a streaming line was...

Keywords

France Seminar report Social impacts Social LCA 

References

  1. Benoit C, Mazijn B (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP/SETAC, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jolliet O et al (2004) The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(6):394–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jorgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jorgensen A, Finkbeiner M, Jorgensen MS, Hauschild MZ (2010) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:376–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Reitinger C, Dumke M, Barosevcic M, Hillerbrand R (2011) A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vanclay F (2002) Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Asses 22:183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Weidema BP (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:89–96, Special issueCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Macombe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pauline Feschet
    • 2
  • Michel Garrabé
    • 3
  • Denis Loeillet
    • 2
  1. 1.Cemagref, UMR ITAPMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.CIRADMontpellier Cedex 5France
  3. 3.University Montpellier IMontpellier Cedex 2France

Personalised recommendations