Comparison of different treatment options for palm oil production waste on a life cycle basis
- 1.5k Downloads
Background, aim, and scope
Globally, 45 million metric tonnes of palm oil has been produced in 2009. The production of 1 t crude palm oil requires 5 t of fresh fruit bunches (FFB). On average, processing of 1 t FFB in palm oil mills generates 230 kg empty fruit bunches (EFB) and 650 kg palm oil mill effluent (POME) as residues. These residues cause considerable environmental burdens, particularly greenhouse gas emissions. In order to reduce those emissions, four waste management options are compared in the present study using 1,000 kg of FFB as functional unit.
A detailed life cycle model has been used to calculate the environmental impacts of POME and EFB treatment. The options under investigation are: (1) dumping EFB and storing POME and ponds, (2) returning EFB to the plantation and POME as before, (3) using EFB and POME for co-composting and returning the produced compost to the plantation, (4) generating biogas from POME and thereafter as in (3). The CML 2001 method included in the GABI 4.3 software package has been used for the impact calculations. Sensitivity analysis has been carried out in order to estimate the influence of good and poor management practice on the environmental performance.
Results and discussion
The main contributor to the GWP is methane from POME and EFB dumping. The GWP of palm oil mill waste treatment can be reduced from 245 kg CO2eq per ton FFB to up to 5 kg CO2eq per ton FFB due to reduced methane emissions and nutrient recycling. Co-composting of POME and EFB leads to considerable nutrient recovery, in addition to GWP reduction. Thus, the composting process reduces not only environmental burdens; it also leads to net environmental benefit regarding most environmental impact categories, e.g., acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone layer depletion potential, etc. due to the avoided emissions from inorganic fertilizer production. The recovery of nutrients in EFB can be achieved by solely returning it to the plantation, but only the combined treatment of EFB and POME allows nutrient recovery from POME while methane emissions from pond systems are avoided simultaneously. The fermentation of POME to produce biogas reduces environmental burdens when operating under best practice conditions. However, fugitive biogas emissions of more than 2% reverse that beneficial effect.
Conclusion and recommendation
A life-cycle-based comparison of conventional and advanced treatment systems for EFB and POME can support decision makers regarding waste treatment options and provide information on technology risks involved. The results of this study may be used as basic calculation data for clean development mechanism for palm oil mills. LCA is shown to be a powerful tool to estimate and compare environmental impacts of different options. Unfortunately, it is rarely used in the palm oil industry in order to improve or optimize palm oil production systems. This study has shown that nutrient recovery from POME and EFB offers considerable environmental and economic benefits to palm oil production systems. However, using EFB for energy production, as it is discussed and realized by some palm oil mills, prohibits environmental beneficial POME utilization. Best waste management practice reduces emissions at palm oil mills and consequently the carbon footprint of palm oil products. Co-composting of EFB and POME, with or without prefermentation of POME in a biogas plant, is a profitable way to use the nutrients from both POME and EFB.
KeywordsCompost Empty fruit bunches (EFB) Greenhouse gas (GHG) Life cycle assessment (LCA) Methane Nutrient recycling Palm oil mill effluent (POME)
The authors acknowledge Dr. Tjahono Herawan (Indonesian Oil Palm Research Institute, IOPRI, Medan, Indonesia) and Dipl.-Ing. Klaus Wulfert (UTEC, Bremen, Germany) for valuable data and discussion.
- Chan KW (2005) Best-developed practices and sustainable development of the oil palm industry. Journal of Oil Palm Research 17:124–135Google Scholar
- Chee KH, Chiu SB (1999) Fruit waste recycling by mulching with empty fruit bunches. The Planter 75(882):435–442Google Scholar
- PE Europe (2003) Software and database for life cycle engineering. PE Europe GmbH and IKP University of Stuttgart, 2003Google Scholar
- FNR (2009) Biogas-Messprogramm II. 61 Biogasanlagen im Vergleich. ISBN 978-3-9803927-8-5, 168 ppGoogle Scholar
- Goh KJ, Chew PS, Kee KK (1994) Nutrient for mature oil palm in Malaysia. IPI Research Topics no. 17, 36 ppGoogle Scholar
- Guinée JB (ed) (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1-4020-0228-9Google Scholar
- Gurmit S, Manoharan S, Toh TS (1990) United plantations approach to palm oil mill by-product management and utilisation. In: Proceedings of the 1989 POROM International Palm Oil Development Conference—Agriculture. Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, pp 225–234Google Scholar
- ICTSD (2008) Biofuel production, trade and sustainable development. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2006a) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol. 5. Solid waste disposal, Chapter 3.2.3. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/5_Volume5/V5_3_Ch3_SWDS.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2010
- IPCC (2006b) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol. 5. WASTE, Chapter 4, http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/5_Volume5/V5_4_Ch4_Bio_Treat.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2010
- IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 ppGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2006a) ISO 14040: environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2006b) ISO 14044: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- PEACE (2007) Indonesia and climate charge: current status and policies. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINDONESIA/Resources/Environment/ClimateChange_Full_EN.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2010
- Rettenmaier N, Reinhardt G, Münch J, Gärtner S (2007) Netzwerk Lebenszyklusanalysen Datenprojekt “Nachwachsende Rohstoffe”. ifeu-Institut für Energie-und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH, pp 1–42Google Scholar
- Schmidt JH (2007) Life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil (summary Report). Aalborg University, Department of Development and PlanningGoogle Scholar
- Schuchardt F, Susilawati E, Guritno P (1998) Influence of C/N ratio and inoculum upon rotting characteristics of oil palm empty fruit bunch. In: Proceedings of 1998 International Palm Oil Conference Chemistry, Bali, Indonesia, September 23–25, 1998, pp 501–510Google Scholar
- Schuchardt F, Wulfert K, Damoko D, Darmosarkoro W, Sutara ES (2001) Feasibility study on full-scale plants for treatment of waste water and solid waste from palm oil mills. pp 1–142Google Scholar
- Schuchardt F, Wulfert K, Darnoko D (2002a) A new, integrated concept for combined waste (EFB) and waste water (POME) treatment in palm oil mills—technical, economical and ecological aspects. Enhancing oil palm industry development through environmentally friendly technology. In: Proceedings of Chemistry and Technology Conference, Nusa Dua Bali, Indonesia, July 8–12, 2002, pp 330–343Google Scholar
- Schuchardt F, Darnoko D, Guritno P (2002b) Composting of empty oil palm fruit bunch (EFB) with simultaneous evaporation of oil mill waste water (POME). Enhancing oil palm industry development through environmentally friendly technology. In: Proceedings of Chemistry and Technology Conference, Nusa Dua Bali, Indonesia, July 8–12, 2002, pp 235–243Google Scholar
- Schuchardt F, Wulfert K, Darnoko D, Herawan T (2006) Sustainable waste water (POME) and waste (EFB) management in palm oil mills by a new process. In: Proceedings of the International Oil Palm Conference 2006, Chemistry Technology Economics, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia, 19–23 June, 2006, pp 201–211Google Scholar
- Schuchardt F, Wulfert K, Darnoko D, Herawan T (2008) Effect of new palm oil mill processes on the EFB and POME utilisation. Journal of Oil Palm Research (Special Issue October 2008):115–126Google Scholar
- Sunitha S, Varghese PT (1999) Composting of oil palm wastes for efficient recycling of nutrients in palm plantations. The Planter 75(885):677–681Google Scholar
- USDA (2009) Indonesia: palm oil production growth to continue. http://www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/highlights/2009/03/Indonesia/. Accessed January 26, 2010
- USDA (2010) Palm oil: world supply and distribution. http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdreport.aspx?hidReportRetrievalName=BVS&hidReportRetrievalID=710&hidReportRetrievalTemplateID=8. Accessed January 26, 2010
- Wulfert K, Darnoko D, Tobing PL, Yulisari R, Guritno P (2002) Treatment of POME in anaerobic fixed bed digesters. Proceeding of International Oil Palm Conference IOPC 2002:265–275Google Scholar