Life cycle assessment of fine chemical production: a case study of pharmaceutical synthesis
- First Online:
- 1.2k Downloads
Background, aim, and scope
Pharmaceuticals have been recently discussed in the press and literature regarding their occurrence in rivers and lakes, mostly due to emissions after use. The production of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) has been less analyzed for environmental impacts. In this work, a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the production of an API from cradle to factory gate was carried out. The main sources of environmental impacts were identified. The resulting environmental profile was compared to a second pharmaceutical production and to the production of basic chemicals.
Materials and methods
Detailed production data of a pharmaceutical production in Basel, Switzerland were used as the basis of this work. Information about the production of precursor chemicals was available as well. Using models and the ecoinvent database to cover remaining data gaps, a full life cycle inventory of the whole production was created. Using several life cycle impact assessment methods, including Cumulative Energy Demand (CED), Global Warming Potential (GWP), Eco-Indicator 99 (EI99), Ecological Scarcity 2006, and TRACI, these results were analyzed and the main sources of environmental burdens identified.
Pharmaceutical production was found to have significantly more environmental impacts than basic chemical production in a kilogram-per-kilogram basis. Compared to average basic chemical production, the API analyzed had a CED 20 times higher, a GWP 25 times higher and an EI99 (H/A) 17 times higher. This was expected to a degree, as basic chemicals are much less complex molecules and require significantly fewer chemical transformations and purifications than pharmaceutical compounds. Between 65% and 85% of impacts were found to be caused by energy production and use. The fraction of energy-related impacts increased throughout the production process. Feedstock use was another major contributor, while process emissions not caused by energy production were only minor contributors to the environmental impacts.
The results showed that production of APIs has much higher impacts than basic chemical production. This was to be expected given the increased complexity of pharmaceutical compounds as compared with basic chemicals, the smaller production volumes, and the fact that API production lines are often newer and less optimized than the production of more established basic chemicals. The large contributions of energy-related processes highlight the need for a detailed assessment of energy use in pharmaceutical production. The analysis of the energy-related contributions to the overall impacts on a process step level allows a comprehensive understanding of each process’ contribution to overall impacts and their energy intensities.
Environmental impacts of API production were estimated in a cradle-to-gate boundary. The major contributors to the environmental impacts in aggregating methods were resource consumption and emissions from energy production. Process emissions from the pharmaceutical manufacturing plant itself were less of a concern in developed countries. Producers aiming to increase their sustainability should increase efforts to reduce mass intensity and to improve energy efficiency.
Recommendations and perspectives
Pharmaceutical companies have increased their efforts to optimize resource efficiency and energy use in order to improve their environmental performance. The results of this study can be used as a first step to perform a full cradle to grave LCA of pharmaceutical production and use, which could include other important phases of the pharmaceutical product life cycle. To assess a commercial pharmaceutical, the results of API production have to be compared to the contributions of other ingredients and formulation.
KeywordsChemical production Energy efficiency Energy use LCA of chemicals Pharmaceuticals
- ACS (2008) American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute pharmaceutical roundtable. http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=PP_TRANSITIONMAIN&node_id=1422&use_sec=false&sec_url_var=region1&__uuid=6e4e42c8-3b8f-47df-b03f-247e369debf7
- Capello C, Hellweg S, Hungerbühler K (2007b) The ecosolvent Tool. http://www.sust-chem.ethz.ch/tools/ecosolvent
- Frischknecht R, Steiner R, Braunschweig A, Egli N, Hildesheimer G (2006) Swiss ecological scarcity method: The New Version 2006Google Scholar
- Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2000) The eco-indicator 99: a damage orientated method for life-cycle impact assessment. Methodology report 2000a, Pre ConsultantsGoogle Scholar
- Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts MAJ, De Shruyver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008—A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, http://www.lcia-recipe.net/
- Jiménez-Gonzalez C (2000) Life cycle assessment in pharmaceutical applications. PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
- Mutel C, Kestenholz M (2008) The Brightway LCA model. http://brightwaylca.org
- Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox—the UNEP–SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J LCA 13:532–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sheldon RA (1994) Consider the environmental quotient. Chemtech 24:38–47Google Scholar
- The ecoinvent centre (2008a) Ecoinvent 2.01 database. http://www.ecoinvent.ch
- The ecoinvent centre (2008b) Ecoinvent 2.01 Reports, Chapter 1: Overview and MethodologyGoogle Scholar
- The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Fourth Report. Climate Change 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg1.htm
- Thieme Chemistry (2009) Römpp Online. http://www.roempp.com
- Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 2006: 7th Electronic Edition. http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/ueic/. Wiley, Weinheim
- Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (1997) VDI-richtlinie 4600: cumulative energy demand, terms, definitions, methods of calculation. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
- Wernet G, Papadokonstantakis S, Hellweg S, Hungerbuhler K (2009) Bridging data gaps in environmental assessments: modelling impacts of fine and basic chemical production. Green Chem 11:1826–1831Google Scholar