The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time!
- 5.5k Downloads
Authors of different sustainability journals, including authors of articles in past issues of the International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment have acknowledged the rising interest and the pressing need for a social and socio-economic life cycle assessment methodology and identified challenges in its development and implementation. Social life cycle assessment (LCA) allows identification of key issues, assessing, and telling the story of social conditions in the production, use, and disposal of products. In this article, the United Nations Environment Programme/The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products will be presented.
Aim and scope
The guidelines demystifies the assessment of product life cycle social impacts and presents an effective framework representing the consensus of an international group of experts leading research in this field. The guidelines complement those for environmental life cycle assessment and life cycle costing, and by doing so contribute to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development. They enable a larger group of stakeholders to engage. Key aspects of the framework and the research needs identified in the guidelines will be summarized.
In a globalized world where transparency and information occupies a predominant place and where consumers and companies reach out to shed light on both the brightest and the darkest side of the economy and, when applicable, transform its condition, social LCA brings strong value. At a moment where major companies and initiatives are going forward with using LCA and are trying to track and communicate about the social impacts of their products they are increasingly held accountable for the guidelines for social life cycle assessment arrive just in time to inform their efforts.
KeywordsBusiness Guidelines Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) Social responsibility Socioeconomic Supply chain Sustainability
The authors of this article wish to thank the other co-authors of the Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products, in particular the chair of the project group and co-editor Bernard Mazijn, and the sponsors of the publication.
- Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) (2009) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of ProductsGoogle Scholar
- Benoît C et al (2008) Development of the Social Life Cycle Assessment Code of Practice: an international effort within the Life Cycle Initiative, Second International Seminar on Society and Materials. SAM2, NantesGoogle Scholar
- Benoît C, Parent J, Kuenzi I, Revéret J-P (2007) Presentation: developing a methodology for social life cycle assessment: the North American tomato’s CSR case, 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management, August 27-29, Zürich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Blom M., Solmar C (2009) How to socially assess biofuels, a case study of the UNEP/SETAC code of practice for social-economical LCA. Master’s thesis in cooperation with the Division of Quality and Environmental Management at Luleå University of Technology, commissioned by Enact Sustainable Strategies in Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
- Casado Cañeque F (2002) Evaluación de la situación laboral de empresas: El análisis del ciclo de vida como herramienta para el desarrollo sostenible. PhD Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, Divisió de Ciències Juridíques, Economiques i Socials, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
- Fava J, Consoli F, Denson R, Dickson K, Mohin T, Vigon B (1993) A conceptual framework for life-cycle impact assessment. Workshop Report, Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC. Foundation for Environmental Education, Inc, PensacolaGoogle Scholar
- Grießhammer R, Benoît C, Dreyer LC, Flysjö A, Manhart A, Mazijn B, Méthot AL, Weidema B (2006) Feasibility study: integration of social aspects into LCA. Öko-Institut, FreiburgGoogle Scholar
- Norris G (2003) Life cycle approach to sustainable consumption: conceptual design of a methodological framework. Final report. The Society of Non-Traditional Technology (AIST), TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Norris G (2004) Life cycle sustainable consumption analysis: evaluating the health impacts of income changes and development in life cycle assessments. Final report. The Society of Non-Traditional Technology (AIST), TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Weidema BP (2006) Social impact categories, indicators, characterisation and damage modelling. Presentation for the 29th Swiss LCA Discussion ForumGoogle Scholar