Life cycle assessment of wood-based heating in Norway
Background, aim, and scope
In this study, we evaluate the environmental effects of wood-based household heating. Wood is a significant source of household heating in Norway, and a comparative life cycle assessment of a wood-based heating system using an old and a modern stove was conducted to estimate the total life cycle benefits associated with the change from old to new combustion technology.
Materials and methods
The study uses a new approach to complete the inventory. Input–output data are used in combination with the Leontief price model to estimate inputs of products and services from the background economy to the birch wood supply chain.
When comparing new and old stove technology, the results show that the new technology contributes to a significantly improved performance (28–80%) for all types of environmental impact studied. As there is a large share of old wood stoves still in use, replacing the old stoves with new ones can lead to substantial reductions in environmental impacts, especially impacts affecting human health. The use phase, i.e., wood combustion, is responsible for over 60% of the impact within all categories. Both the old and new stove provide heating with emissions of greenhouse gases ranging from one third (new stove, ∼80 g CO2-eq/kWh) to half (old stove, ∼110 g CO2-eq/kWh) of the impacts compared to electricity use from the Nordic electricity mix (∼210 g CO2-eq/kWh) to heat the house.
Combustion of the wood is found to be most important for all types of impacts, even for global warming, where the CO2 emissions from combustion are treated as “climate neutral.” Products of incomplete combustion are the reason for this, as well as the high contribution to other impact categories. Emission factors for these substances are subject to high uncertainty. Although the combustion phase is the most important stage in the life cycle, transportation distances can play an important role. To render wood as environmentally benign as possible, one should thus seek to shorten the distances from producer to consumer.
There is a significant difference in the life cycle performance of a wood stove using modern technology versus older technologies within all impact categories. In addition, there is a preference to use locally produced firewood over wood transported over long distances.
Recommendations and perspectives
A strong emphasis on phasing out old woodstoves should be maintained and is well justified.
KeywordsBirch wood Household heating LCA Norway Wood-based household heating Wood stove
- Boman C, Nordin A, Öhman M, Boström D, Westerholm R (2005) Emissions from small-scale combustion of biomass fuels—extensive quantification and characterization. Technical Report STEM-BHM (P12648-1 and P21906-1), Energy Technology and Thermal Process Chemistry, Umeå University, Sweden & Analytical Chemistry, Arrhenius Laboratory Stockholm University, Sweden. http://www.itm.su.se/bhm/rapporter/emission/126481o219061.pdf
- Dones R, Bauer C, Bolliger R, Burger B, Faist Emmenegger M, Frischknecht R, Heck T, Jungbluth N, Röder A (2007) Life cycle inventories of energy systems: results for current systems in Switzerland and other UCTE countries. Ecoinvent report 5, Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, CHGoogle Scholar
- Enova SF (2008) Household heating equipment subsidies in Norway. http://tilskudd2006.enova.no/
- Finstad A, Haakonsen G, Rypdal K (2002) Utslipp til luft av dioksiner i Norge—Dokumentasjon av metode og resultater. Technical report, Statistics NorwayGoogle Scholar
- Finstad A, Flugsrud K, Haakonsen G, Aasestad K (2003) Vedforbruk, Fyringsvaner og Svevestøv. Undersøkelse om vedforbruk og fyringsvaner i Trondheim og Bergen. Technical Report 2004/27, Statistics Norway (SSB)Google Scholar
- Guinee JB (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Eco-efficiency in industry and science. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Haakonsen G, Kvingedal E (2001) Utslipp til luft for vedfyring i Norge. Technical report, Statistics NorwayGoogle Scholar
- Herendeen R, Brown S (1987) A comparative analysis of net energy from woody biomass. Energy Economy 120(1):75–84Google Scholar
- Hertwich EG, Mateles SF, Pease WS, McKone TE (2006) An update of the human toxicity potential with special consideration of conventional air pollutants. IndEcol Working Papers 1/2006, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway, 2006. www.ntnu.no/oko
- Holmijoki O, Paloviita A (2001) Life cycle assessment on forestry and forest products, volume COST Action E9, chapter total value of wood-based products—combined LCA and input–output analysis. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels, pp 267–276Google Scholar
- Hubner C, Boos R, Prey T (2005) In-field measurements of pcdd/f emissions from domestic heating appliances for solid fuels. Chemosphere 580(3):367–372Google Scholar
- Institute of Environmental Sciences (2004) CML 2 baseline 2000, version 2.03. Technical report, CML. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, LeidenGoogle Scholar
- Jøtul (2005) Jøtul product catalogue. Technical report. Jøtul Woodstove Manufacturer, OsloGoogle Scholar
- Larsen BM, Nesbakken R (2005) Formålsfordeling av husholdningenes elektrisitetsforbruk i 2001. Statistics NorwayGoogle Scholar
- Norges offentlige utredninger (2004) Differensisert El-avgift for husholdningene. Technical report 2004:8, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
- Norsk Standard (1994) NS3059 enclosed wood heaters—smoke emission—requirements. Norsk StandardGoogle Scholar
- Norsk Standard (1997) NS4414—Ved til brensel i husholdninger. Norsk StandardGoogle Scholar
- Nussbaumer T, Oser M (2004) Evaluation of biomass combustion based energy systems by cumulative energy demand and energy yield coefficient. Technical report, International Energy Agency IEA Bioenergy Task 32 and Swiss Federal Office of Energy. Verenum, Zürich. ISBN 3-908705-07-XGoogle Scholar
- Olje- og energidepartementet (1999) St.meld. nr. 29 (1998–99) om energipolitikken. Technical report, Olje- og energidepartementet, Oslo, 1999Google Scholar
- Petersen AK, Solberg B (2005) Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden. For Policy Econ 7:249–259Google Scholar
- Spielmann M, Bauer C, Dones R (2007) Transport services. Ecoinvent report 14. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, DübendorfGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Norway (2001). Input–output tables 2000, 2001. http://www.ssb.no/nr_en/input-output.html . Disaggregated version delivered by Statistics Norway
- Statistics Norway (2004a) Energy statistics, 2004a. www.ssb.no/emner/01/03/10/husenergi/tab-2007-05-23-07.html
- Statistics Norway (2004b) Forestry statistics, 2004b. http://www.ssb.no/emner/10/04/20/skogbruk/arkiv/art-2005-01-31-01.html
- Statistics Norway (2005) Firewood consumption statistics, 2005. http://www.ssb.no/magasinet/miljo/art-2005-12-05-01.html
- Statistics Norway (2006) Forestry statistics 2006. http://www.ssb.no/emner/10/04/20/nos_skogstat/arkiv/nos_c709/tab/2.10.html
- Statistics Norway (2007) Statistical Yearbook of Norway 2007. Technical report, Statistics Norway, 2007. http://www.ssb.no/english/yearbook/
- Statistics Norway (2008) Nasjonalregnskap og miljø (NAMEA—National Accounts Matrix including Environmental Accounts). http://www.ssb.no/vis/emner/09/01/nrmiljo/om.html. Accessed fall 2008
- US Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Wood burning efficiency and safety. http://www.epa.gov/woodstoves/efficiently.html. Accessed spring 2009
- Werner F, Althaus HJ, Künniger T, Klaus K (2007) Life cycle inventories of wood as fuel and construction material. Ecoinvent report 9. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, DübendorfGoogle Scholar