Advertisement

Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions related to aluminium transport applications

  • Marlen Bertram
  • Kurt Buxmann
  • Peter Furrer
LIFE CYCLE PERFORMANCE OF ALUMINIUM APPLICATIONS • METHODOLOGY & CASE STUDY

Abstract

Background, aim and scope

Climate change is a subject of growing global concern. Based on International Energy Agency (IEA 2004) research, about 19% of the greenhouse gas emissions from fuel combustion are generated by the transportation sector, and its share is likely to grow. Significant increases in the vehicles fleets are expected in particular in China, India, the Middle East and Latin America. As a result, reducing vehicle fuel consumption is most essential for the future. The reduction of the vehicle weight, the introduction of improved engine technologies, lower air friction, better lubricants, etc. are established methods of improving fuel efficiency, reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Continued progress will be required along all these fronts with light-weighting being one of the most promising options for the global transport sector. This paper quantifies greenhouse gas savings realised from light-weighting cars with aluminium based on life cycle assessment methodology. The study uses a pragmatic approach to assess mass reduction by comparing specific examples of components meeting identical performance criteria. The four examples presented in this analysis come from practical applications of aluminium. For each case study, the vehicle manufacturer has supplied the respective masses of the aluminium and the alternative component.

Material and methods

A full life cycle assessment with regards to greenhouse gas emissions and savings has been carried out for different aluminium applications in cars as compared to the same applications in steel or cast iron. The case studies reference real cases, where aluminium is actually used in series production. The studies are based on a greenhouse gas lifecycle model, which has been developed following the ISO standard 14040 framework. For each component, sensitivity analysis is applied to determine the impact of lifetime driving distance, driving characteristics (impact of air friction) and recycling rate.

Results

Life cycle results show that in automotive applications, each kilogram of aluminium replacing mild steel, cast iron or high strength steel saves, depending on the specific case (bumper and motor block of a compact car, front hood of a large family car, body-in white of a luxury car), between 13 and 20 kg of greenhouse gas emissions.

Discussion

The performed sensitivity analysis finds that even with ‘worst case’ scenarios savings are still significant.

Conclusions

The results not only demonstrate significant benefits of aluminium with regard to greenhouse gas savings but also show that these are very sensitive to variations of the recycling rate, the life-time driving distance and the driving behaviour.

Recommendations and perspectives

Good care is needed to gather life-cycle data and to make informed estimates, where no data are available. Furthermore, greenhouse gas savings for additional components should be calculated using this life cycle model to sustain the findings.

Keywords

Aluminium Automotive Climate change Greenhouse gas emissions ISO standard 14044 LCA Light-weighting Transport sector 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank J. Hannagan and P. Morton for helpful discussions and B. Gilmont, K. Martchek, and G. Rebitzer for assistance in the research.

References

  1. Atherton J (2007) Declaration by the metals industry on recycling principles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(1):59–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boin UMJ, Bertram M (2005) Melting standardized aluminium scrap: a mass balance model for Europe. JOM 57(8):26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buxmann K (2002) Treatment of aluminium recycling in life cycle assessments. Paper presented at the International Automobile Recycling Congress, March 13–15, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  4. Buxmann K, Kistler P, Rebitzer G (2009) Independent information modules—a powerful tool for life cycle management. Int J Life Cycle Assess, Special Issue 14(1)Google Scholar
  5. Ducker Research (2006) Aluminum content for light non-commercial vehicles to be assembled in North America, Japan and the European Union in 2006Google Scholar
  6. EAA (2008) Environmental profile report for the European Aluminium Association—life cycle inventory data for aluminium production and transformation processes in Europe, www.eaa.net
  7. Helms H, Lambrecht U (2004) Energy savings by light-weighting—part II. IFEU Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  8. Helms H, Lambrecht U (2007) The potential contribution of light-weighting to reduce transport energy consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(2):58–64Google Scholar
  9. Helms H, Lambrecht U, Höpfner U (2003) Energy savings by light-weighting—part I. IFEU Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  10. IAI (2007) Life cycle assessment of aluminium: Inventory data for the primary aluminium industry—year 2005. Update, www.world-aluminium.org
  11. IAI (2008) Improving sustainability in the transport sector through weight reduction and the application of aluminium-model, www.world-aluminium.org
  12. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2004) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. IFEU (Institute for Energy- and Environmental Research) (2001) Transport emission estimation model (TREMOD). Software tool developed by IFEU for the ‘Umweltbundesamt’ (German environmental agency), vers Nov 2001Google Scholar
  14. IISI (2006) Internal document. IISI, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  15. Julius J, Mutz S (2008) Automotive recycling-aluminium recovery from end-of-life vehicles. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, EAA internal document prepared by: Chair of Processing and Recycling (I.A.R.)Google Scholar
  16. Schmidt W, Dahlqvist E, Finkbeiner M, Krinke S, Lazzari S, Oschmann D, Pichon S, Thiel C (2004) Life cycle assessment of lightweight and end-of-life scenarios for generic compact class passenger vehicles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(6):405–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Werner F, Richter K (2000) Economic allocation in LCA: A case study about aluminium window frames. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(2):79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. White M (2006) Cans or cars—aluminium & the automotive industry a JLR light vehicle strategy. Aluminium 2006: 21st International Aluminium Conference, MoscowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Recycling and Sustainable DevelopmentInternational Aluminium InstituteLondonUK
  2. 2.International Aluminium InstituteSierreSwitzerland
  3. 3.Novelis AGZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations