CO2 reduction potentials by utilizing waste plastics in steel works

  • Yu Sekine
  • Koichi Fukuda
  • Kenji Kato
  • Yoshihiro Adachi
  • Yasunari Matsuno
CASE STUDY
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Feedstock recycling has received attention as an effective method to recycle waste plastics. However, estimating the reduction potential by life cycle assessment using coke oven and blast furnace in steel works has been a challenging task due to the complex structure of energy flow in steel works. Municipal waste plastics consist of several plastic resins. Previous studies have generally disregarded the composition of waste plastics, which varies significantly depending on the geographical area. If the reduction potentials by using each plastic resin in steel works can be quantified, the potential of municipal waste plastics (mixtures of plastic resins) can be estimated by summing up the potential of each resin multiplied by the composition of each resin in municipal waste plastics. Therefore, the goal of this study is to investigate the reduction potentials of CO2 emissions by using individual plastic resins (polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET)) and those for municipal waste plastics in the coke oven and blast furnace.

Materials and methods

A model was developed to clarify the energy flow in steel works. In order to estimate the changes in energy and material balance in coke ovens when waste plastics are charged, the equations to calculate the coke product yield, gas product yield, and oil product yields of each plastic resin were derived from previous studies. The Rist model was adopted to quantify the changes in the inputs and outputs when plastics were fed into a blast furnace. Then, a matrix calculation method was used to calculate the change in energy balance before and after plastics are fed into a coke oven.

Results

It was confirmed that product yields of municipal waste plastics (mixtures of plastic resins) could be estimated by summing up the product yield of each plastic resin multiplied by the composition of each resin in municipal waste plastics. In both cases of coke oven and blast furnace feedstock recycling, the reduction potential of CO2 emissions varies significantly depending on the plastic resins. For example, in the case of coke oven chemical feedstock recycling, the reduction potential of PS and PP is larger than that of PE. On the other hand, in the case of blast furnace feedstock recycling, PE has the largest CO2 emissions reduction potential, whereas the CO2 emission reduction potential of PP is smaller than those of PE and PS. In both cases, PET has negative CO2 emission reduction potentials, i.e., there is an increase of CO2 emissions. In addition, the reduction potentials of CO2 emissions are slightly different in each city.

Discussions

The differences in the reduction potentials of CO2 emissions by coke oven chemical feedstock recycling of each plastic resin is attributable to the differences in calorific values and coke product yields of each plastic resin. On the other hand, the difference in the CO2 emission reduction potential for each plastic resin in blast furnace feedstock recycling is attributable to the difference in calorific values and the carbon and hydrogen content of each plastic resin, which leads to a difference in the coke substitution effect by each plastic resin. In both cases, the difference in those of municipal waste plastics is mostly attributable to the amount of impurities (e.g., ash, water) in the municipal waste plastics.

Conclusions

It was found that the reduction potential of CO2 emissions by coke oven and blast furnace feedstock recycling of municipal waste plastics (mixtures of plastic resins) could be estimated by summing up the potential of each resin multiplied by the composition of each resin in municipal waste plastics. It was also clarified that feedstock recycling of waste plastic in steel works is effective for avoiding the increase in CO2 emissions by incinerating waste plastics, such as those from household mixtures of different resins.

Recommendations and perspectives

With the results obtained in this study, reduction potentials of CO2 emissions can be calculated for any waste plastics because differences in composition are taken into account.

Keywords

Blast furnace feedstock recycling Coke oven chemical feedstock recycling Composition of waste plastics Life cycle inventory analysis Matrix calculation method 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F (2003) Life cycle assessment of a plastic packaging recycling system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(2):92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asanuma M, Ariyama T (2004) Recycling of waste plastics in blast furnace. J I Energy 83:252–256Google Scholar
  3. Avila AF, Duarte MV (2003) A mechanical analysis on recycled PET/HDPE composites. Polymer Degrad Stabil 80(2):373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bor YJ, Chien Y, Hsu E (2004) The market-incentive recycling system for waste packaging containers in Taiwan. Environ Sci Pol 7(6):509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braunegg G, Bona R, Schellauf F, Wallner E (2004) Solid Waste Management and Plastic Recycling in Austria and Europe. Polymer–Plast Technol Eng 43(6):1755–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg G (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results. J Cleaner Prod 13(3):213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fortelny I, Michalkova D, Krulis Z (2004) An efficient method of material recycling of municipal plastic waste. Polymer Degrad Stabil 85(3):975–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garfort AA, Ali S, Hernandez-Martınez J, Akah A (2004) Feedstock recycling of polymer wastes. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sc 8(6):419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heijungs R (1994) A generic method for the identification of options for cleaner products. Ecol Econ 10(1):69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heijungs R (2000) Chain Management by Life Cycle Assessment (CMLCA). CML, Leiden University, The Netherlands, http://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/cmlca.html, accessed 20.3.2008
  11. Holmgren K, Henning D (2004) Comparison between material and energy recovery of municipal waste from an energy perspective: a study of two Swedish municipalities. Resour Conserv Recycl 43(1):51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu X, Calo JM (2006) Plastic particle separation via liquid-fluidized bed classification. Am Inst Chem Eng 52(4):1333–1342Google Scholar
  13. Inaba R, Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y (2005) Life cycle assessment of recycling in the steel industry for plastics containers and packaging. J Japan Soc Waste Manage 16(6):467–480 in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. JCPRA (The Japan Containers and Packaging Recycling Association) (2007) Investigations on environmental impacts of recycling methods for plastics containers and packaging (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. JEMAI (Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry) (2001) LCA-software ‘JEMAI-LCA’Google Scholar
  17. Kaminsky W, Predel M, Sadiki A (2004) Feedstock recycling of polymers by pyrolysis in a fluidised bed. Polymer Degrad Stabil 85(3):1045–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kato K, Nomura S, Fukuda K, Uematsu H, Takamatsu N, Kondo H (2002a) Effect of waste plastics recycling technology using coke ovens on energy consumption. J Iron Steel Inst Jap 15(4):756Google Scholar
  19. Kato K, Nomura S, Uematsu H (2002b) Development of waste plastics recycling process using coke oven. ISIJ Int 42(Suppl):S10–S13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kato K, Nomura S, Uematsu H (2003) Waste plastics recycling process using coke ovens. J Mater Cycle Waste Manage 5(2):98–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim D, Shin S, Sohn S, Choi J, Ban B (2002) Waste plastics as supplemental fuel in the blast furnace process: improving combustion efficiencies. J Hazard Mater 94(3):213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koo J, Kim S, Seo Y (1991) Characterization of aromatic hydrocarbon formation from pyrolysis of polyethylene polystyrene mixtures. Resour Conserv Recycl 5(4):365–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsuno Y, Betz M (2000) Development of life cycle inventories for electricity grid mixes in Japan. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(5):295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. METI (Research and Statistics Department, Economic and Industrial Policy Bureau, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) (2001) 2001 Yearbook of Iron and Steel Statistics (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  25. METI (Research and Statistics Department, Economic and Industrial Policy Bureau, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) (2004) Report on recyclability of containers and packaging, plastic bale (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  26. Ministry of the Environment (2003) Report on a method to calculate amount of emission of greenhouse effect gas (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  27. Molgaard C (1995) Environmental impacts by disposal of plastic from municipal solid waste. Resour Conserv Recycl 15(1):51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mutha NH, Patel M, Premnath V (2006) Plastics materials flow analysis for India. Resour Conserv Recycl 47(3):222–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narita N, Sagisaka M, Inaba A (2001) Reduction effects of CO2 emission from steel products by reduction agent injection into blast furnace. J Japan Inst Metals 65(7):589–595 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  30. Nishioka K, Yoshida S (1984) Investigation of bonding pattern of coal particles and factors for determination of coke properties during carbonization. Tetsu to hagane 70(3):351–357Google Scholar
  31. Nishioka K, Yoshida S, Hariki M (1984) Development of the carbonization simulation model with consideration of coking mechanism. Tetsu to hagane 70(3):358–365Google Scholar
  32. Nisioka K (1990) Sun fossil: Coal (in Japanese). Agne Gijutsu Center, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  33. Noda R, Komatsu M, Sumi E, Kasakura T (2001) Evaluation of material recycling for plastics: environmental aspects. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 3(2):118–125Google Scholar
  34. Okuwaki A (2004) Feedstock recycling of plastics in Japan. Polymer Degrad Stabil 85(3):981–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patel M, von Thienen N, Jochem E, Worrell E (2000) Recycling of plastics in Germany. Resour Conserv Recycl 29(1–2):65–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perugini F, Mastellone ML, Arena U (2005) A life cycle assessment of mechanical and feedstock recycling options for management of plastic packaging wastes. Environ Prog 24(2):137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Plastic Waste Management Institute (2005a) An Introduction to Plastic Recycling in Japan 2004, 4 Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental and resource impact assessment of recycling methods by LCA. http://www.pwmi.or.jp/ei/ei_pk.htm, accessed 16.10.2008
  38. Rist A, Meysson N (1967) A dual graphic representation of blast-furnace mass and heat balances. J Metals 9(4):50–56Google Scholar
  39. Ross S, Evans D (2003) The environmental effect of reusing and recycling a plastic-based packaging system. J Cleaner Prod 11(5):561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sakamoto K (1986) Development of carbonization in coke ovens: estimation of gas evolution patterns. Tetsu to Hagane 72(12):S840Google Scholar
  41. Shent H, Pugh RJ, Forssberg E (1999) A review of plastics waste recycling and the flotation of plastics. Resour Conserv Recycl 25(2):85–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Song H, Moon K, Hyun JC (1999) A life-cycle assessment (LCA) study on the various recycle routes of PET bottles. Korean Chem Eng 16(2):202–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Subramanian PM (2000) Plastics recycling and waste management in the US. Resour Conserv Recycl 28(3–4):253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suh S, Huppes G (2005) Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. J Cleaner Prod 13(7):687–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan (2006) Iron and steel handbookGoogle Scholar
  46. Vinyl Environmental Council (2001) Report on LCI for recycling and waste management of PVC productsGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams PT, Williams EA (1999) Interaction of plastics in mixed-plastics Pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 13(1):188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiao R, Jin B, Zhou H, Zhong Z, Zhang M (2007) Air gasification of polypropylene plastic waste in fluidized bed gasifier. Energ Convers Manage 48(3):778–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yamakita R, Miura K, Ishino Y, Ohiwa N (2005) An investigation on thermal recycling of recycled plastics resin. JSME Int J 48(1):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang G-H, Zhua J-F, Okuwaki A (2007) Prospect and current status of recycling waste plastics and technology for converting them into oil in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 50(3):231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ziebik A, Stanek W (2001) Forecasting of the energy effects of injecting waste plastics into the blast furnace in comparison with other auxiliary fuels. Energy 26(12):1159–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu Sekine
    • 1
  • Koichi Fukuda
    • 2
  • Kenji Kato
    • 2
  • Yoshihiro Adachi
    • 1
  • Yasunari Matsuno
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials EngineeringThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Environment & Process Technology CenterNippon Steel CorporationChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations