Journal of Chinese Political Science

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 267–288 | Cite as

A New Model of Multilateral Development Bank: a Comparative Study of Road Projects by the AIIB and ADB

  • Jianzhi Zhao
  • Yannan GouEmail author
  • Wanying Li


As one of the hallmarks of China’s increasing participation in global economic governance, the establishment of the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has been widely studied by scholars and policy circles worldwide. However, most of the existing studies use narrative methods and lack microscopic or macroscopic evidence. By selecting two highly comparable cases, road projects from the AIIB and the traditional multilateral development bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), we analyze the management structure, procurement, economy, risk, supervision and safeguard policy framework for both cases. We find that the AIIB mostly aligns with international practices in critical principles but has streamlined project procurement, risk and supervision, which reflects its claim of being “lean” and “clean”. We argue that compared with the ADB, the AIIB is probably more efficient and economically sustainable, which is an improvement on the traditional multilateral development banks (MDBs). However, whether the streamlined procedures lead to higher risks will be tested in time as the AIIB conducts more independent projects in the future.


AIIB ADB Governance structure Case study Project analysis 



We are grateful to Shanghai Science Foundation (18692103100) for generous support.


  1. 1.
    Asian Development Bank. 2017. Meeting Asia’s infrastructure needs: Highlights. Manila. Accessed 20 June 2018.
  2. 2.
    Maverick, T. 2015. TPP versus AIIB: Obama’s uphill battle. Wall Street Daily News 21 July. Accessed 22 June 2018.
  3. 3.
    Wolf, A., and R. A. Rogowsky. 2015. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Questions that should be asked. ThE15 Initiative. Accessed 23 June 2018.
  4. 4.
    Asian Development Bank. 2009. Infrastructure for a seamless Asia. Accessed 18 September 2018.
  5. 5.
    Takatoshi, I. 2015. The future of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Concerns for transparency and governance. Centre on Japanese Economy and Business, Columbia Business School. Accessed 18 September 2018.
  6. 6.
    Bhattacharya, A., and M. Romani. 2013. Meeting the infrastructure challenge: The case for a new development bank. Washington, D.C.: G24.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Griffith-Jones, S. 2014. A BRICS development bank: A dream coming true? UNCTAD Discussion Papers 215, Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mar, P. 2015. Can the AIIB be a shot in the arm for sustainable growth in Asia? Asia Global Institute, University of Hong Kong. Accessed 18 September 2018
  9. 9.
    Reisen, H. 2015. Will the AIIB and the NDB help reform multilateral development banking? Global Policy 6 (3): 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Economist. 2014.Why China is creating a new “World Bank” for Asia’. for-asia. Accessed 18 September 2018.
  11. 11.
    Wang, H. 2015. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: A new Bretton Woods moment? A total Chinese triumph? CIGI Policy Brief 59. Accessed 18 September 2018.
  12. 12.
    Zheng, C., and Y. Liu. 2018. Strategic reassurance in institutional contests: explaining China’s creation of the AIIB. Journal of Contemporary China. Accessed 20 September 2018.
  13. 13.
    Hamanaka, S. 2016. Insights to great powers' desire to establish institutions: Comparison of ADB, AMF, AMRO and AIIB. Global Policy 7 (2): 288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Etzioni, A. 2016. The Asian infrastructure investment Bank: A case study of multifaceted containment. Asian Perspective 40 (2): 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan, L., and P. K. Lee. 2017. Power, ideas and institutions: China’s emergent footprints in global governance of development aid. CSGR Working Paper No. 281/17, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick. Accessed 18 September 2018.
  16. 16.
    He, K. 2015. Contested regional orders and institutional balancing in the Asia pacific. International Politics 52 (2): 208–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heilmann, S., M. Rudolf, M. Huotari, and J. Buckow. 2014. China’s shadow foreign policy: Parallel structures challenge the established international order. In MERICS China Monitor 18. Berlin: Mercator Institute for China Studies.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jakupec, V., and M. Kelly. 2015. The relevance of Asian Development Bank: Existing in the shadow of the Asian infrastructure investment Bank. Journal of Regional & Socio-Economic Issues 5 (3): 31–46.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu, H. 2017. Motivation behind China’s “One Belt, One Road” initiatives and establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Journal of Contemporary China 26 (105): 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gransow, B., and S. Price. 2018. Social risk management at AIIB – Chinese or international characteristics? Journal of Chinese Political Science 1 (2): 1–23.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nelson, R. M. 2015. Multilateral development banks: Overview and issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service Report R41170. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cai, K. G. 2018. The one belt one road and the AIIB: Beijing’s new strategy of geo-economics and geopolitics. Journal of Contemporary China. Accessed 20 September 2018.
  23. 23.
    Paradise, J.F. 2016. The role of “parallel institutions” in China’s growing participation in global economic governance. Journal of Chinese Political Science 21 (2): 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park, M. 2017. China-led AIIB as a gradual modification of Asian financial order: Chinese strategies to launch new financial institution. Journal of International and Area Studies 24 (2): 57–76.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ren, X. 2016. China as an institution-builder: The case of the AIIB. The Pacific Review 29 (3): 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jin, L. 2014. A speech on the establishment progress of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank by Mr. Jin Liqun, head of the working group for establishment of AIIB. Boao Forum for Asia. July 31. Accessed 18 September 2018.
  27. 27.
    Xinhua. 2015. AIIB to be lean, clean and green, Chinese officials say. People’s Daily Online 12 April. Accessed 18 September 2018.
  28. 28.
    Chin, G.T. 2016. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Governance innovation and prospects. Global Governance 22: 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hanlon, R.J. 2017. Thinking about the Asian infrastructure investment Bank: Can a China-led development bank improve sustainability in Asia? Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies 4 (3): 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yang, H. 2016. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and status-seeking: China’s foray into global economic governance. Chinese Political Science Review 1 (4): 754–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    Independent Evaluation Group. 2010. Safeguards and sustainability policies in a changing world. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Humphrey, C. 2015. Developmental revolution or Bretton Woods revisited? The prospects of the BRICS New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Working Paper 418: 30–31.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wan, M. 2016. The Asian infrastructure investment Bank. The construction of power and the struggle for the east Asian international order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Government of India, Planning Commission. 2012. Twelfth five year plan 2012-17. New Delhi. Accessed 21 June 2018.
  36. 36.
    Government of India. 2017. Three year action agenda 2017–18 to 2019–20. New Delhi. Accessed 21 June 2018.
  37. 37.
    PRS Legislative Research. 2018. Madhya Pradesh budget analysis 2018-19. Accessed 22 June 2018.
  38. 38.
    PRS Legislative Research. 2018. Gujarat budget analysis 2018-19. Accessed 22 June 2018
  39. 39.
    Alie, S. S. 2015. Project governance: #1 critical success factor. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2015. Orlando, FL. Accessed 20 September 2018.
  40. 40.
    Eriksson, P.E., and M. Westerberg. 2011. Effects of procurement on construction project performance. International Conference on Management of Technology 29 (2): 197–208.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Khisa, N.R. 2015. Influence of procurement process on completion of road construction projects in Kenya: a case of Bungoma south sub-county. University of Nairobi. Kenya. Accessed 20 September 2018.
  42. 42.
    Laby, N.C., A. Arokiaprakash, M. Indira, and S. Manivel. 2016. Analysis of factors influencing procurement process and proposing a decision making module for construction projects on multi-site context. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research (11)9: 6689–6693.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lavanya, N., T. Malarvizhi. 2008. Risk analysis and management: A vital key to effective project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2008. Accessed 22 June 2018.
  44. 44.
    African Development Bank. 2010. Project supervision at the African Development Bank 2001–2008: An independent evaluation. Accessed 21 June 2018.
  45. 45.
    Baum, W.C. 1982. The project cycle. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kilby, C. 1995. Supervision and performance: The case of World Bank projects. Discussion Paper 45. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Asian Development Bank. 2014. Project administration manual. Madhya Pradesh district connectivity sector project (no. 47270). In Manila.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Górski, J. 2016. An update on AIIB's procurement regulations, procurement policy and co-operation with other multilateral development banks. Chinese University of Hong Kong, Centre for Financial Regulation and Economic Development, Working Paper No. 17.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Asian Development Bank. 2015. Procurement guidelines. Manila. Accessed 21 June 2018.

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International Relations and Public AffairsFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations