Advertisement

Journal of Chinese Political Science

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 585–602 | Cite as

An Operational Code Analysis of China’s National Defense White Papers: 1998-2015

  • Yi Edward Yang
  • Jonathan W. Keller
  • Joseph Molnar
RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • 194 Downloads

Abstract

Scholarly efforts to predict the future character of the U.S.-China relationship abound. Few however looks to leaders’ beliefs as valid explanatory variables. In this paper, we argue that state leaders’ belief systems are key to understanding both the states’ intentions and policy choices. We analyze China’s national defense white papers (1998–2015) published to date as the source material to gauge the core collective beliefs of three generations of Chinese leadership. The operational code framework is employed to conceptualize and measure these beliefs. Our results identified important crossgenerational changes in a few belief indicators. In the Xi Jinping era, for instance, the political world is seen as less friendly and cooperative strategies are viewed less favorably. In terms of tactics, the policy tools “threaten” and “promise” are viewed as significantly more useful by the current leadership than by past Chinese leaders.

Keywords

Chinese foreign policy Operational code National Defense White Paper Leader’s beliefs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Stephen Walker for his valuable advice and comments on various theoretical and technical issues examined in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Blasko, D.J. 1999. A new PLA force structure. In The People’s liberation Army in the information age, ed. James C. Mulvenon and Richard H. Yang. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blasko, D.J. 2015. The 2015 Chinese defense white paper on strategy in perspective: Maritime missions require a change in the PLA mindset. China Brief 15(12). The Jamestown Foundation. https://jamestown.org/program/the-2015-chinese-defense-white-paper-on-strategy-in-perspective-maritimemissions-require-a-change-in-the-pla-mindset/. Accessed 1 May 2017
  3. 3.
    Cheng, D. 2015. China’s newest defense white paper suggests fundamental change in perspective. Issue brief #4428 on National Security and defense. The Heritage Foundation. http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2015/07/chinas-newest-defense-white-paper-suggests-fundamental-change-in-perspective.
  4. 4.
    Cottam, M.L., E. Mastors, T. Preston, and B. Dietz. 2015. Introduction to political psychology. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dyson, S.B. 2001. Drawing policy implications from the ‘Operational Code’ of a ‘New’ political actor: Russian President Vladimir Putin. Policy Sciences 34 (3–4): 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eckert, P. 2001. Dismantled U.S. Spy Plane Flown Out of China. ABC News. http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=80826.
  7. 7.
    Feng, H. 2005. The operational code of Mao Zedong: Defensive or offensive realist? Security Studies 14 (4): 637–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedberg, A.L. 2005. The future of U.S.-China relations: Is conflict inevitable? International Security 30 (2): 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedberg, A.L. 2014. China’s recent assertiveness: implications for the future of U.S.-China relations. Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, June 25, 2014, Washington, DC, https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Friedberg_Testimony%20.pdf.
  10. 10.
    George, A.L. 1969. The “operational code”: A neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision making. International Studies Quarterly 13: 190–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    George, A.L. 1979. The causal nexus between cognitive beliefs and decision making behavior: The “operational code” belief system. In Psychological Models in International Politics, ed. L. Falkowski, 95–123. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartnett, D.M. 2013. China’s 2012 defense white paper: Panel discussion report. CNA China Studies. Center for Naval Analyses. https://www.cna.org/CNA_files/PDF/CCP-2013-U-005876-Final.pdf.
  13. 13.
    He, K., and H. Feng. 2013. Xi Jinping’s operational code beliefs and China’s foreign policy. Chinese Journal of International Politics 6 (3): 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He, K., and H. Feng. 2015. Transcending rationalism and constructivism: Chinese leaders’ operational codes, socialization processes, and multilateralism after the cold war. European Political Science Review 7 (3): 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holsti, O. 1970. The “operational code” approach to the study of political leaders: John Foster Dulles’ philosophical and instrumental beliefs. Canadian Journal of Political Science 3: 123–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holsti, O. 1977. The “operational code” as an approach to analysis of belief systems. Final Report to the National Science Foundation. Grant No. SOC75–15368.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hong, N. 2015. Messages from China’s National Defense White Paper. The Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://amti.csis.org/messages-from-chinas-national-defense-white-paper/.
  18. 18.
    Ikenberry, G.J. 2008. The rise of China and the future of the west: Can the liberal system survive? Foreign Affairs 87 (1): 23–35.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnston, A.I. 2008. Social States: China in International Institutions: 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katkov, M. 2016. China returns U.S. Navy drone seized In South China Sea. NPR. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/12/20/506256081/china-returns-u-s-navy-drone-seized-in-south-china-sea.
  21. 21.
    Legro, J. 2007. What China will want: The future intentions of a rising power. Perspectives on Politics 5 (3): 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leites, N. 1951. The operational code of the politburo. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leites, N. 1953. A study of bolshevism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, N. 2006. Chinese civil-military relations: The transformation of the People’s liberation Army. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malici, A., and J. Malici. 2005. The operational codes of Fidel Castro and Kim Il sung: The last cold warriors? Political Psychology 26: 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marfleet, B.G. 2000. The operational code of John F. Kennedy during the Cuban missile crisis: A comparison of public and private rhetoric. Political Psychology 21: 545–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mearsheimer, J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mearsheimer, J. 2010. The gathering storm: China’s challenge to U.S. power in Asia. Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (4): 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Politico Staff. 2016). Trump slams China's seizure of U.S. drone in tweet. Politico. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-china-drone-seizure-232775.
  30. 30.
    Renshon, J. 2009. When public statements reveal private beliefs: Assessing operational codes at a distance. Political Psychology 30 (4): 649–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schafer, M. 2000. Issues in assessing psychological characteristics at a distance: an introduction to the symposium. Political Psychology 21 (3): 511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schafer, M., and S. Walker. 2006. Beliefs and leadership in world politics: Methods and applications of operational code analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shen, S. 2016. 10 characteristics of Chinese diplomacy in the xi Jinping era. Foreign Policy Association. https://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2016/04/19/10-characteristics-of-chinese-diplomacy-in-the-xi-jinping-era/.
  34. 34.
    Stuart, D., and H. Starr. 1981. The “inherent bad faith model” reconsidered: Dulles, Kennedy, and Kissinger. Political Psychology 3: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sullivan, A., and S. Erickson. 2015. The big story behind China’s new military strategy. The Diplomat. http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/the-big-story-behind-chinas-new-military-strategy/.
  36. 36.
    Walker, S.G. 1977. The Interface between beliefs and behavior: Henry Kissinger’s operational code and the Vietnam war. Journal of Conflict Resolution 21: 129–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Walker, S.G. 1983. The motivational foundations of political belief systems: A re-analysis of the operational code construct. International Studies Quarterly 27: 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Walker, S.G. 1990. The evolution of operational code analysis. Political Psychology 11: 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Walker, S.G. 1995. Psychodynamic processes and framing effects in foreign policy decision-making: Woodrow Wilson’s operational code. Political Psychology 16: 697–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walker, S.G. 2004. Role identities and the operational codes of political leaders. In Advances in political psychology, ed. M.G. Hermann, 71–106.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Walker, S.G., and L. Falkowski. 1984. The operational codes of U.S. presidents and secretaries of state: Motivational foundations and behavioral consequences. Political Psychology 5: 237–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Walker, S.G., and M. Schafer. 2006. Belief systems as causal mechanisms in world politics: An overview of operational code analysis. In Mark Schafer and Stephen G. Walker (Eds.), Beliefs and Leadership in World Politics: Methods and Applications of Operational Code Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Walker, S.G., and M. Schafer. 2007. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson: Realist and idealist archetypes? Political Psychology 28: 747–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Walker, S.G., and M. Schafer. 2010. Operational code theory: Beliefs and foreign policy decisions. In The International Studies Encyclopedia, ed. Richard a. Denmark, (2010 Ed.). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Walker, S.G., M. Schafer, and M.D. Young. 1998. Systematic procedures for operational code analysis: Measuring and modeling Jimmy Carter’s operational code. International Studies Quarterly 42: 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang, S. 1998. The military expenditure of China, 1989–1998. Yale University Department of Political Science. Chinese University of Hong Kong Press. Available at: http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/gpa/wang_files/Milex.pdf.
  47. 47.
    Yahuda, M. 2013. China’s new assertiveness in the South China Sea. Journal of Contemporary China 22 (81): 446–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhang, J. 2015. China’s new foreign policy under xi Jinping: Towards ‘peaceful rise 2.0’? Global Change, Peace & Security 27 (1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Edward Yang
    • 1
  • Jonathan W. Keller
    • 1
  • Joseph Molnar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceJames Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA
  2. 2.HerndonUSA

Personalised recommendations