Advertisement

Journal of Chinese Political Science

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 537–561 | Cite as

Disrespect for Human Rights and Contentious Participation: Evidence from China

  • Ching-Hsing Wang
  • Dennis Lu-Chung Weng
  • Laura Barnstead
  • Garrett DuMond
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the perception of human rights conditions and individual participation in contentious political activities in China. The empirical results show that people perceiving higher levels of disrespect for human rights are more likely to sign a petition, join the boycott movement, attend demonstrations, strike, and participate in other forms of protests. The results confirm the optimistic perspective that people perceiving human rights violations tend to participate in contentious politics in an effort to fight for their rights. This suggests that human rights abuses will stimulate public contentious participation, which then endangers the stability of the regime.

Keywords

Human rights Contentious Participation Contentious Politics Protest China 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, C.J., P.M. Regan, and R.L. Ostergard. 2002. Political repression and public perceptions of human rights. Political Research Quarterly 55 (2): 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, C.J., A. Paskeviciute, M.E. Sandovici, and Y.V. Tverdova. 2005. In the eye of the beholder? The foundations of subjective human rights conditions in east-Central Europe. Comparative Political Studies 38 (7): 771–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, P. 2002. Human rights, Europe and the People’s republic of China. The China Quarterly 169: 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beetham, D. 1991. The legitimation of power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benson, M., and T.R. Rochon. 2004. Interpersonal trust and the magnitude of protest: A micro and macro level approach. Comparative Political Studies 37 (4): 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bollen, K.A. 1986. Political rights and political liberties in nations: An evaluation of human rights measures, 1950 to 1984. Human Rights Quarterly 8 (4): 567–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Booth, J.A., and P.B. Richard. 1996. Repression, participation and democratic norms in urban central America. American Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 1205–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cai, Y. 2010. Collective resistance in China: Why popular protests succeed or fail. Stanford: Standard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carlson, M., and O. Listhaug. 2007. Citizens’ perceptions of human rights practices: An analysis of 55 countries. Journal of Peace Research 44 (4): 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Campbell, A., P.E. Converse, W.E. Miller, and D.E. Stokes. 1960. The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, X. 2012. Social protest and contentious authoritarianism in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cingranelli, DL, Richards DL and Clay KC (2014) The CIRI Human Rights Dataset. http://www.humanrightsdata.com. Version 2014.04.14.
  13. 13.
    Davenport, C., and D.A. Armstrong II. 2004. Democracy and the violation of human rights: A statistical analysis from 1976-1996. American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 538–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grzymala-Busse, A. 2012. Why comparative politics should take religion (more) seriously. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gurr, T. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    King, G., J. Pan, and M.E. Roberts. 2013. How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review 107 (2): 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leitner, H., E. Sheppard, and K.M. Sziarto. 2008. The Spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (2): 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leung, P.P. 2015. Labor activists and the new working class in China: Strike leaders’ struggles. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li, L., and K.J. O’Brien. 2008. Protest leadership in rural China. The China Quarterly 193: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li, Y., and A.C. Drury. 2004. Threatening sanctions when engagement would be more effective: Attaining better human rights in China. International Studies Perspectives 5 (4): 378–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin, A. 2012. Young people and politics: Political engagement in the Anglo-American democracies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marien, S., M. Hooghe, and E. Quintelier. 2010. Inequalities in non-institutionalized forms of political participation: A multi-level analysis for 25 countries. Political Studies 58 (1): 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meyer, D.S., and S. Tarrow, eds. 1998. The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murdie, A., and D. Peksen. 2015. Women and contentious politics: A global event-data approach to understanding women’s protest. Political Research Quarterly 68 (1): 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Brien, K.J., ed. 2008. Popular protest in China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sen, A. 2004. Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (4): 315–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tasioulas, J. 2013. Human rights, legitimacy, and international law. American Journal of Jurisprudence 58 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, and H.E. Brady. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wachman, A.M. 2001. Does the diplomacy of shame promote human rights in China? Third World Quarterly 22 (2): 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wallace, M., and J.C. Jenkins. 1995. The new class, postindustrialism, and neocorporatism: Three images of social protest in the western democracies. In The politics of social protest: Comparative perspectives on states and social movements, ed. J.C. Jenkins and B. Klandermans, 96–137. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wan, M. 2007. Human rights lawmaking in China: Domestic politics, international law, and international politics. Human Rights Quarterly 29 (3): 727–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhou, Q. 2005. Conflicts over human rights between China and the US. Human Rights Quarterly 27 (1): 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhu, J.-H., and S. Rosen. 1993. From discontent to protest: Individual-level causes of the 1989 pro-democracy movement in China. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 5 (3): 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ching-Hsing Wang
    • 1
  • Dennis Lu-Chung Weng
    • 2
  • Laura Barnstead
    • 2
  • Garrett DuMond
    • 2
  1. 1.Hobby School of Public AffairsUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceState University of New YorkCortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations