Journal of Chinese Political Science

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 77–88 | Cite as

A Network Approach to the Study of the World Uyghur Congress’ Global Outreach: A Methodological Note

Research Article
First Online:

Abstract

This methodological note is to introduce new social network analysis (SNA) data sets that can be used to visualize and analyze the global linkages of the World Uyghur Congress (WUC). The results show that first of all, the WUC and Rebiya Kadeer play central roles in mobilizing political activity around the globe. Second, human rights NGOs and other organizations from the Uyghur diaspora pervade the networks of the WUC, and are spearheading the coordination of events and the exchange of information. Third, the WUC is keen on connecting with government representatives and journalists. Fourth, a growing number of links exist between the WUC and news organizations. Such links are most obvious among news organizations situated within the same country, when a Uyghur-related event occurs. A quintessential example is observed in the SNA map, where Japanese press and media showed interest in reporting Uyghur news when WUC Secretary General Dolkun Isa visited Japan to promote the Uyghur issue in 2006. A case study of Uyghur linkages in Australia further demonstrates WUC influence over Uyghur activism in various corners of the world. The purpose of this paper is not only to provide the first visualization and empirical test in regard to WUC networks that China’s government and various China observers have believed to exist. With this document, I also demonstrate how a network approach can provide alternate ways for researchers to conduct their respective studies on diasporic networks of Tibetans, Taiwanese, or Chinese.

Keywords

Social network analysis (SNA) World Uyghur Congress (WUC) Uyghur diasporic organizations Actor-event data Diasporic networks 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is written based on a working paper, entitled “Transporting Conflicts via Migratory Routes: A Social Network Analysis (SNA) of Uyghur International Mobilization” posted online by the Consortium of Non-Traditional Security Studies in Asia (NTS-Asia) based in Singapore. I would like to thank the financial support of the Consortium in 2010, the Sumitomo Foundation (Japan) in 2011, and the Institute of Political Science at the Academia Sinica (Taiwan) in 2011. This research would not have been completed without the research assistance of Maike Schneider and Delia A. Pop. I am also indebted to James Leibold for his thorough comments on my earlier draft.

References

  1. 1.
    Amnesty International. 1999. People’s Republic of China: gross violations of human rights in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amnesty International. 2002. People’s Republic of China: China’s anti-terrorism legislation and repression in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amnesty International. 2007. People’s Republic of China: Rebiya Kadeer’s personal account of Gulja after the massacre on 5 February 1997. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., and L.C. Freeman. 1999. UCINET 6.0 Version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett, and L.C. Freeman. 2002. UCINET for Windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, Y.-W. 2010. Who made Uyghurs visible in the international arena? A hyperlink analysis. Global Migration and Transnational Politics (GMTP) Working Paper. Fairfax: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarke, M. 2010. China, Xinjiang and the internationalization of the Uyghur issue. Global Change, Peace and Security 22(2): 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Finley, J.S. 2007. Chinese oppression in Xinjiang, Middle Eastern conflicts and global Islamic solidarities among the Uyghurs. Journal of Contemporary China 16(53): 627–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanneman, R.A., and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hämmerli, A., R. Gattiker, and R. Weyermann. 2006. Conflict and cooperation in an actors’ network of Chechnya based on event data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(2): 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Millward, J. 2004. Violent separatism in Xinjiang: a critical assessment. Washington DC: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China. 2003. List of the first batch of identified “Eastern Turkistan” terrorist organizations and terrorists. Beijing: Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shichor, Y. 2006. Changing the guard at the World Uyghur Congress. China Brief VI(25): 12–14.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shichor, Y. 2009. Ethno-diplomacy: the Uyghur Hitch in Sino-Turkish Relations. Honolulu: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Skibinsky, A. 2007. East Turkestan: massacre remembered. Epoch Times, February 12, http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-2-12/51605.html (accessed December 20, 2010).
  16. 16.
    Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization. 2009. Repression in China: roots and repercussions of the Urumqi Unrest. The Hague: Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 2007. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    World Uyghur Congress. 2009. World Uyghur Congress: activity report, October 2006–March 2009. Munich: World Uyghur Congress.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Political Science, Academia SinicaTaipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations