Sustainable development of global entrepreneurship: infrastructure and perspectives
- 139 Downloads
Development of the modern global entrepreneurship is one of the most perspective and promising means of overcoming the consequences of the global economic crisis, as well as prevention of future crises of economic systems, as it ensures full level of optimization of production and distribution processes. The purpose of the article is to determine perspectives of sustainable development of the global entrepreneurship. For determining the level of sustainability of development of the modern global entrepreneurship, the authors use the methods of statistical analysis of time rows (method of horizontal and trend analysis). The authors perform a complex analysis of dynamics of development of global companies and performed evaluation of their sustainability. Also, the necessity for changing the model of managing the development of modern global entrepreneurship for increasing its sustainability is substantiated. As a result, it is concluded that modern global entrepreneurship is developing in the unstable way, and practical recommendations are offered for solving this problem. A perspective model of sustainable development of the modern global entrepreneurship is developed and presented. A certain limitation of the results of the performed research is the framework character of the offered recommendations.
KeywordsSustainable development Global crisis Global entrepreneurship
JEL ClassificationF44 Q001
- Alcaraz-Calero, J., Belikaidis, I.-P., Cano, C.J.B., ..., Tercero, M., Wang, Q. (2018). Leading innovations towards 5G: Europe's perspective in 5G Infrastructure Public-Private Partnership (5G-PPP). IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC, 2017-October, p. 1–5.Google Scholar
- Dreher & Sturm (2016). KOF index of globalization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0522-7
- Malyshkov, V. I., & Ragulina, Y. V. (2014). The entrepreneurial climate in Russia: The present and the future. Life Science Journal, 11(6), 118–121.Google Scholar
- Namazi, M., & Namazi, N. R. (2017). An empirical investigation of the effects of moderating and mediating variables in business research: Insights from an auditing report. Contemporary Economics, 11(4), 459–470.Google Scholar
- Nica, M. (2010). Small business clusters in Oklahoma: Mar or Jacobs effects? Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 10(2), 5–19.Google Scholar
- Popkova, E. G. (2014). New prospects of economic growth in context of underdevelopment whirlpools phenomena. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 14(1), 5–25.Google Scholar
- Reveiu, A., & Dârdală, M. (2015). Influence of cluster type business agglomerations for development of entrepreneurial activities study about Romania. Amfiteatru Economic, 17(38), 107–119.Google Scholar
- Schwab, K. (2016). The global competitiveness report 2015–2016. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2018.
- Skiter, N., Semenychev, V., & Litvinova, T. N. (2015). Model of economic growth in Russia under conditions of integration into the world economy. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 15(2), 63–70.Google Scholar
- Vanka, G. M., Heijman, W. J. M., & Vasiljevic, Z. (2012). Present state analysis of cluster initiatives in Serbian transition economy. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 58(12), 566–579.Google Scholar