Advertisement

Who am I? The influence of social identification on academic entrepreneurs’ role conflict

  • Bo ZouEmail author
  • Jinyu Guo
  • Feng Guo
  • Yan Shi
  • Yanxia Li
Article
  • 308 Downloads

Abstract

Academic entrepreneurs are the key actors in academic entrepreneurship. However, the individual level of research on academic entrepreneurship remains undeveloped. To better understand the micro foundation of academic entrepreneurship, we investigate the influence of social identification on academic entrepreneurs’ role conflict. Using data from 246 academic entrepreneurs, we explore the effects of scholarly identification, entrepreneurial identification, and social identity continuity on academic entrepreneurs’ role conflict. The results suggest that, entrepreneurial identification and social identify continuity are both negative related to identify conflict, while a scholarly identification is positively related to role conflict. In addition, the interaction of scholarly identification and entrepreneurial identification is negatively associated with role conflict. We also investigate the performance implications of such a role conflict and show that it is negatively related to academic entrepreneurship performance. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Keywords

Academic entrepreneurship Academic entrepreneurs Social identity theory Role conflict 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71672049.

References

  1. Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408–422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P. W., Marsh, M., et al. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 418–431.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3069464.Google Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. (2000). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Abindon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
  6. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2004). Emotion and performance. Human Performance, 17(2), 137–144.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1702_1.Google Scholar
  7. Avenier, M. J., & Cajaiba, A. P. (2012). The dialogical model: Developing academic knowledge for and from practice. European Management Review, 9(4), 199–212.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2012.01038.x.Google Scholar
  8. Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 21.Google Scholar
  9. Bassuk, S. S., Glass, T. A., & Berkman, L. F. (1999). Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 131(3), 165–173.  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-131-3-199908030-00002.Google Scholar
  10. Bauer, J. C., Schmitt, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Winer, R. S. (2013). Managerial decision making in customer management: Adaptive, fast and frugal? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(4), 436–455.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0320-7.Google Scholar
  11. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.Google Scholar
  12. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307.Google Scholar
  13. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393923.Google Scholar
  14. Chandler, M. J., & Lalonde, C. (1998). Cultural continuity as a hedge against suicide in Canada's first nations. Transcultural Psychiatry, 35(2), 191–219.  https://doi.org/10.1177/136346159803500202.Google Scholar
  15. Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., Martin, B. R., Chi, H.-R., & Tsai-Lin, T.-F. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis. Technovation, 54, 7–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.006.Google Scholar
  16. Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W. (1998). The determinants of new venture performance: An extended model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 5–30.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Ellemers, N. (2003). Identity, culture, and change in organisations: A social identity analysis and three illustrative cases. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 191–203). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ethier, K. A., & Deaux, K. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 243–251.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.243.Google Scholar
  21. Ferreira, J. J., Ferreira, F. A., Fernandes, C. I., Jalali, M. S., Raposo, M. L., & Marques, C. S. (2016). What do we [not] know about technology entrepreneurship research? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(3), 713–733.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0359-2.Google Scholar
  22. Fisher, R. T. (2001). Role stress, the type A behavior pattern, and external auditor job satisfaction and performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 143–170.Google Scholar
  23. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980.Google Scholar
  24. George, G., Jain, S., & Maltarich, M. A. (2005). Academics or entrepreneurs? Entrepreneurial identity and invention disclosure behavior of university scientists. Working paper.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.799277.
  25. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). Thirty years after Bayh–dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005.Google Scholar
  26. Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 83–113.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903321208907.Google Scholar
  27. Haslam, C., Holme, A., Haslam, S. A., Iyer, A., Jetten, J., & Williams, W. H. (2008). Maintaining group memberships: Social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(5–6), 671–691.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010701643449.Google Scholar
  28. Hekman, D. R., Bigley, G. A., Steensma, H. K., & Hereford, J. F. (2009). Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 506–526.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.41330897.Google Scholar
  29. Hirsh, J. B., & Kang, S. K. (2016). Mechanisms of identity conflict: Uncertainty, anxiety, and the behavioral inhibition system. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 223–244.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315589475.Google Scholar
  30. Hogg, M. A. (2009). Managing self-uncertainty through group identification. Psychological Inquiry, 20(4), 221–224.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903333452.Google Scholar
  31. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173–190). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  32. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140.Google Scholar
  33. Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2787127.Google Scholar
  34. Iyer, A., Jetten, J., Tsivrikos, D., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2009). The more (and the more compatible) the merrier: Multiple group memberships and identity compatibility as predictors of adjustment after life transitions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 707–733.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X397628.Google Scholar
  35. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007.Google Scholar
  36. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1222–1233.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1222.Google Scholar
  37. Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00831.x.Google Scholar
  38. Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2012). Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 14–28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492611411923.Google Scholar
  39. Korschun, D. (2015). Boundary-spanning employees and relationships with external stakeholders: A social identity approach. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 611–629.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0398.Google Scholar
  40. Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B., & Hanna, B. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 357–389). Thousand Oaks: Sage.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n17.Google Scholar
  41. Kuncel, N. R., & Rigdon, J. (2012). Communicating research findings. In N. Schmitt & S. Highhouse (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop212003.
  42. Ladge, J. J., Clair, J. A., & Greenberg, D. (2012). Cross-domain identity transition during liminal periods: Constructing multiple selves as professional and mother during pregnancy. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1449–1471.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0538.Google Scholar
  43. Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64(4), 241–256.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015309.Google Scholar
  44. Libaers, D. (2017). Time allocations across collaborations of academic scientists and their impact on efforts to commercialize novel technologies: Is more always better? R&D Management, 47(2), 180–197.  https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12164.Google Scholar
  45. Libaers, D., & Wang, T. (2012). Foreign-born academic scientists: Entrepreneurial academics or academic entrepreneurs? R&D Management, 42(3), 254–272.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00682.x.Google Scholar
  46. McGregor, I., Prentice, M., & Nash, K. (2012). Approaching relief: Compensatory ideals relieve threat-induced anxiety by promoting approach-motivated states. Social Cognition, 30(6), 689–714.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.689.Google Scholar
  47. Meyer, K. E., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Beugelsdijk, S. (2017). What’s in ap? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Journal of International Business Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0078-8.
  48. Moutinho, R., Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., Coelho, A., & Manso, J. P. (2016). Determinants of knowledge-based entrepreneurship: An exploratory approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(1), 171–197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0339-y.Google Scholar
  49. Neira, I., Calvo, N., Fernández, L., & Portela, M. (2017). Entrepreneur: do social capital and culture matter? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 665–683.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0418-3.Google Scholar
  50. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (1996). When time is money: Decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 131–152.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0044.Google Scholar
  51. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.Google Scholar
  52. Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  53. Ren, S., Shu, R., Bao, Y., & Chen, X. (2016). Linking network ties to entrepreneurial opportunity discovery and exploitation: The role of affective and cognitive trust. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 465–485.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0350-3.Google Scholar
  54. Richter, A. W., West, M. A., Van Dick, R., & Dawson, J. F. (2006). Boundary spanners' identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1252–1269.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478720.Google Scholar
  55. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486.Google Scholar
  56. Roberts, E. B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology: Lessons from MIT and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195067040.001.0001.Google Scholar
  57. Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm023.Google Scholar
  58. Salipante, P., & Aram, J. D. (2003). Managers as knowledge generators: The nature of practitioner-scholar research in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 129–150.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.26.Google Scholar
  59. Sani, F., Bowe, M., & Herrera, M. (2008). Perceived collective continuity and social well-being: Exploring the connections. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 365–374.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.461.Google Scholar
  60. Schmitz, A., Urbano, D., Dandolini, G. A., de Souza, J. A., & Guerrero, M. (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic setting: A systematic literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 369–395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0401-z.Google Scholar
  61. Shapiro, D. L., Kirkman, B. L., & Courtney, H. G. (2007). Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 249–266.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634433.Google Scholar
  62. Shepherd, D., & Haynie, J. M. (2009). Family business, identity conflict, and an expedited entrepreneurial process: A process of resolving identity conflict. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1245–1264.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00344.x.Google Scholar
  63. Steinberg, J. A., Pineles, S. L., Gardner, W. L., & Mineka, S. (2003). Self-complexity as a potential cognitive buffer among abused women. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(5), 560–579.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.22.5.560.22929.Google Scholar
  64. Sutin, A. R., Terracciano, A., Deiana, B., Naitza, S., Ferrucci, L., Uda, M., Schlessinger, D., & Costa, P. T. (2010). High neuroticism and low conscientiousness are associated with interleukin-6. Psychological Medicine, 40(9), 1485–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709992029.Google Scholar
  65. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.Google Scholar
  66. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter group behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson.Google Scholar
  67. Tse, Y. K., Matthews, R. L., Hua Tan, K., Sato, Y., & Pongpanich, C. (2016). Unlocking supply chain disruption risk within the Thai beverage industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 21–42.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0108.Google Scholar
  68. Turner, J. C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments on social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 518–538). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511759154.008.Google Scholar
  69. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 77–122.Google Scholar
  70. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Bel Air: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  71. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  72. Woolfolk, R. L., Gara, M. A., Ambrose, T. K., Williams, J. E., Allen, L. A., Irvin, S. L., et al. (1999). Self-complexity and the persistence of depression. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 187(7), 393–399.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199907000-00001.Google Scholar
  73. Yuan, L., & Chen, X. (2015). Managerial learning and new product innovativeness in high-tech industries: Curvilinear effect and the role of multilevel institutional support. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.021.Google Scholar
  74. Yusof, M., & Jain, K. K. (2010). Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: A literature survey. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(1), 81–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-007-0072-x.Google Scholar
  75. Zaccaro, S. J., & Banks, D. (2004). Leader visioning and adaptability: Bridging the gap between research and practice on developing the ability to manage change. Human Resource Management, 43(4), 367–380.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20030.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo Zou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jinyu Guo
    • 1
  • Feng Guo
    • 1
  • Yan Shi
    • 1
  • Yanxia Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ManagementHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations