Advertisement

Relational trust and new ventures’ performance: the moderating impact of national-level institutional weakness

  • Boris Bauke
  • Thorsten Semrau
  • Zheng Han
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the link between relational trust in exchange partners and new venture performance, and determines whether weakness in national-level formal institutions influences this link. Based on a sample of 203 entrepreneurs and their new ventures from Germany and China, findings reinforce the idea that new venture performance may profit from relational trust in exchange partners. However, interaction analyses also reveal that the performance implications of relational trust are contingent on the institutional context. The contributions and implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

Relational trust Exchange relationships New venture performance Institutional environment Moderation analysis 

References

  1. Acs, Z., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: the knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: a comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Aldrich, H. (2000). Entrepreneurial strategies in new organizational populations. In R. Swedberg (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The social science view (pp. 211–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aldrich, H., & Auster, E. R. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 165–198.Google Scholar
  7. Amorós, J. E., & Stenholm, P. (2014). Quality of government institutions and entrepreneurial motivation: A multi-country approach. Academy of Management Proceedings. Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, A. R., & Jack, S. L. (2002). The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: a glue or a lubricant? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 14(3), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bachmann, R. (2001). Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization Studies, 22(2), 337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bachmann, R. (2010). Towards a context-sensitive approach to researching trust in inter-organizational relationships. In M. N. K. Saunders, D. Skinner, G. Dietz, N. Gillespie, & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Organizational trust: A cultural perspective (pp. 87–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bachmann, R., & Inkpen, A. C. (2011). Understanding institutional-based trust building processes in inter-organizational relationships. Organization Studies, 32(2), 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baron, R. A., & Tang, J. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ social skills and new venture performance: mediating mechanisms and cultural generality. Journal of Management, 35(2), 282–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Batjargal, B. (2003). Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: a longitudinal study. Organization Studies, 24(4), 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Batjargal, B. (2005). Entrepreneurial versatility, resources and firm performance in Russia: a panel study. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 5(3/4), 1–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Batjargal, B. (2007a). Internet entrepreneurship: social capital, human capital, and performance of internet ventures in China. Research Policy, 36(5), 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Batjargal, B. (2007b). Network triads: transitivity, referral and venture capital decisions in China and Russia. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 998–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Batjargal, B. (2008). The difference between Chinese and Russian entrepreneurs. Harvard Business Review, 86(10), 32–32.Google Scholar
  18. Batjargal, B. (2010). The effects of network’s structural holes: polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and new venture growth in China and Russia. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 146–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Batjargal, B., & Liu, M. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: the role of social capital. Organization Science, 15(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Batjargal, B. A. T., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arregle, J.-L., Webb, J. W., & Miller, T. L. (2013). Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs’ social networks, and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1024–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bromiley, P., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.). (1995). Transaction costs in organizations with trust (Vol. 5, research on negotiations in organizations). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  22. Brush, C. G., & Vanderwerf, P. A. (1992). A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.Google Scholar
  24. Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., Varman, R., & John, G. (2003). Information processing moderators of the effectiveness of trust-based governance in interfirm r&d collaboration. Organization Science, 14(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chan, C. (2011). Reconceptualising the relationship between the mainland Chinese legal system and the Hong Kong legal system. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 6(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen, A. H. (2003). The concept of “one country, two systems” and its application to Hong Kong. In C. S. Hsu (Ed.), Understanding China’s legal system (pp. 353–373). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Chen, X.-P., & Chen, C. (2004). On the intricacies of the Chinese Guanxi: a process model of Guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3), 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chen, M.-H., Chang, Y.-Y., & Lee, C.-Y. (2015). Creative entrepreneurs’ Guanxi networks and success: information and resource. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 900–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Child, J., & Möllering, G. (2003). Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business environment. Organization Science, 14(1), 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: a competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., & Covin, T. J. (1990). Content and performance of growth-seeking strategies: a comparison of small firms in high-and low-technology industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(6), 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Crook, T. R., Shook, C., Madden, T., & Morris, M. L. (2010). A review of current construct measurement in entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(4), 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Curran, J., & Blackburn, R. A. (2001). Researching the small enterprise. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.Google Scholar
  36. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2007). Networking by entrepreneurs: patterns of tie formation in emerging organizations. Organization Studies, 28(12), 1849–1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115–134.Google Scholar
  40. Goerzen, A. (2007). Alliance networks and firm performance: the impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Greiner, L. E. (1998). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 55–68.Google Scholar
  44. Guo, T., Hong, J., Zhao, D., Wu, Y., & Fan, J. (2012). The incubators, venture capital, and new ventures in China. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(4), 358–362.Google Scholar
  45. Gupta, V., Guo, C., Canever, M., Yim, H., Sraw, G., & Liu, M. (2014). Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. He, X., & Cui, L. (2012). Can strong home country institutions foster the internationalization of mnes? Multinational Business Review, 20(4), 352–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holmes, R. M., Miller, T., Hitt, M. A., & Salmador, M. P. (2013). The interrelationships among informal institutions, formal institutions, and inward foreign direct investment. Journal of Management, 39(2), 531–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Honig, B., Lerner, M., & Raban, Y. (2006). Social capital and the linkages of high-tech companies to the military defense system: is there a signaling mechanism? Small Business Economics, 27(4/5), 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Huff, L., & Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: a seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Griffith, D. A., Chabowski, B. R., Hamman, M. K., Bernadine Johnson, D., et al. (2008). An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1064–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hwang, D. B., Golemon, P. L., Chen, Y., Wang, T.-S., & Hung, W.-S. (2009). Guanxi and business ethics in confucian society today: an empirical case study in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 19–51.Google Scholar
  54. Jack, S. L. (2010). Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.Google Scholar
  56. Kale, S., & Arditi, D. (1998). Business failures: liabilities of newness, adolescence, and smallness. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(6), 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lai Si, T.-A., & Möllering, G. (2010). Wary managers: unfavorable environments, perceived vulnerability, and the development of trust in foreign enterprises in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(6), 1016–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lane, C., & Bachmann, R. (1996a). The social constitution of trust: supplier relations in Britain and Germany. Organization Studies, 17(3), 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lane, C., & Bachmann, R. (1996b). Trust within and between organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341–364.Google Scholar
  62. Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Larson, A., & Starr, J. A. (1993). A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 5–15.Google Scholar
  64. Lechner, C., Dowling, M., & Welpe, I. (2006). Firm networks and firm development: the role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 514–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lee, D. Y., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2001). The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lee, R. P., & Zhou, K. Z. (2012). Is product imitation good for firm performance? An examination of product imitation types and contingency factors. Journal of International Marketing, 20(3), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Liefner, I., Brömer, C., & Zeng, G. (2012). Knowledge absorption of optical technology companies in Shanghai, Pudong: successes, barriers and structural impediments. Applied Geography, 32(1), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lo, F. (2013). The dynamic adjustment of environment, strategy, structure, and resources on firm performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(2), 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. (2012). Guanxi and organizational performance: a meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 139–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ma, X., Delios, A., & Lau, C. M. (2013). Beijing or Shanghai? The strategic location choice of large mnes’ host-country headquarters in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9), 953–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. (2005). Embedded ties and the acquisition of competetive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1033–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Menzies, T., Diochon, M., Gasse, Y., & Elgie, S. (2006). A longitudinal study of the characteristics, business creation process and outcome differences of Canadian female vs. Male nascent entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(4), 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. Relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Murphy, P. J., Kickul, J., Barbosa, S. D., & Titus, L. (2007). Expert capital and perceived legitimacy: female-run entrepreneurial venture signalling and performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 8(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  78. Nakata, C., & Sivakumar, K. (1997). Emerging market conditions and their impact on first mover advantages. International Marketing Review, 14(6), 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, instititutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.Google Scholar
  82. Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pérez-Nordtvedt, L., Kedia, B. L., Datta, D. K., & Rasheed, A. A. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency of cross-border knowledge transfer: an empirical examination. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 714–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Jeong-Yeon, L., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Powell, W. W. (Ed.). (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization (Vol. 12, research in organizational behavior). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  86. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Puffer, S. M., McCarthy, D. J., & Boisot, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: the impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(3), 441–467.Google Scholar
  88. Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ramasamy, B., Goh, K. W., & Yeung, M. C. H. (2006). Is Guanxi (relationship) a bridge to knowledge transfer? Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Redding, G. (2005). The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Resick, C., Martin, G., Keating, M., Dickson, M., Kwan, H., & Peng, C. (2011). What ethical leadership means to me: Asian, American, and European perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ring, P. S., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.Google Scholar
  93. Salimath, M., & Cullen, J. B. (2012). Institutional configurations in innovation and entrepreneurship: a multi country study (interactive paper)). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 32(16), 11.Google Scholar
  94. Saparito, P. A., Chen, C. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (2004). The role of relational trust in bank-small firm relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2008). Specialization as strategy for business incubators: an assessment of the central German multimedia center. Technovation, 28(7), 436–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  97. Semrau, T., & Sigmund, S. (2012). Networking ability and the financial performance of new ventures: a mediation analysis among younger and more-mature firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Shane, S., & Venkatraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  99. Sigmund, S., Semrau, T., & Wegner, D. (2015). Networking ability and the financial performance of new ventures: moderating effects of venture size, institutional environment, and their interaction. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Song, M., Podoynitsyna, K., van der Bij, H., & Halman, J. I. M. (2008). Success factors in new ventures: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: the moderation role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tamasy, C. (2007). Rethinking technology-oriented business incubators: developing a robust policy instrument for entrepreneurship, innovation, and regional development? Growth and Change, 38(3), 460–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tanas, J., & Audretsch, D. (2011). Entrepreneurship in transitional economy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(4), 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. The World Bank (2013). The worldwide governance indicators (wgi) project. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home. Accessed 11.07.2015.
  106. Tsai, K.-H., & Yang, S.-Y. (2014). The contingent value of firm innovativeness for business performance under environmental turbulence. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tzeng, C.-H., Beamish, P., & Chen, S.-F. (2011). Institutions and entrepreneurship development: high-technology indigenous firms in China and Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(3), 453–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Vissa, B. (2012). Agency in action: entrepreneurs’ networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organization Science, 23(2), 492–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  112. Wei, Y. H. D., & Liefner, I. (2012). Globalization, industrial restructuring, and regional development in China. Applied Geography, 32(1), 102–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wei, L. Q., Liu, J., Chen, Y. Y., & Wu, L. Z. (2010). Political skill, supervisor-subordinate Guanxi and career prospects in Chinese firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.Google Scholar
  115. Welter, F. (2012). All you need is trust? A critical review of the trust and entrepreneurship literature. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Welter, F., Kauonen, T., Chepurenko, A., Malieva, E., & Venesaar, U. (2004). Trust environments and entrepreneurial behavior - exploratory evidence from Estonia, Germany and Russia. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12(4), 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Whitley, R. (2006). Project-based firms: new organizational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  119. Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Witt, P. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(5), 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. World Economic Forum. (2004). The global competitiveness report 2004–2005. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  122. World Economic Forum. (2010). The global competitiveness report 2010–2011. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  123. World Economic Forum. (2014). The global competitiveness report 2014–2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  124. Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Zajac, E. J., & Olsen, C. P. (1993). From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 30(1), 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547–561.Google Scholar
  128. Zhou, K. Z., Poppo, L., & Zhilin, Y. (2008). Relational ties or customized contracts? An examination of alternative governance choices in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 526–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz University HanoverHanoverGermany
  2. 2.University of CologneKölnGermany
  3. 3.Sino-German School of Postgraduate Studies (CDHK)Tongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations