Fostering university-industry R&D collaborations in European Union countries

Article

Abstract

This paper advances our understanding of university-industry research and development (R&D) collaborations. These strategic relationships are a dimension of entrepreneurial activity, and they are thus important drivers of economic growth and development. Business collaboration with universities increases the efficiency and effectiveness of industrial investments. Previous studies have found that universities are more likely to collaborate with industry if the business is mature and large, is engaged in exploratory internal R&D, and there are not major intellectual property (IP) issues between both parties. Businesses gain from such collaborations through increased commercialisation probabilities and economies of technological scope. Based on publicly available data collected by the Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre of Germany as part of a European Commission project, our paper focuses on two key questions. First, why are there cross-country differences in the extent to which universities collaborate with business in R&D? Second, are there covariates with these differences that might offer insight into policy prescriptions and policy levers for enhancing the extent to which such collaboration takes place? We find that access is positive and statistically significant in relation to fostering university-business R&D collaborations. Our results, albeit that they are tempered by a small sample of data, have implications how national innovation systems support further harmonization of IP regimes across universities and how universities prioritize their own investments and incentives.

Keywords

R&D collaborations Entrepreneurship University-industry partnerships European Union 

References

  1. Bercovitz, J. E. L., & Feldman, M. P. (2007). Fishing upstream: firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, 36, 930–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boardman, P. C., & Corley, E. A. (2008). University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy, 37, 900–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (forthcoming). The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9536-2.
  4. Borras, S. (2004). System of innovation theory and the European Union. Science and Public Policy, 31(6), 425–433.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., & Walsh, J. (1997). Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In R. Noll (Ed.), Challenge to the University (pp. 171–200). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cunningham, J., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2014). The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 3, 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davey, T., Baaken, T., Galán-Muros, V., & Meerman, A. (2011). Study on the cooperation between higher education institutions and public and private organisations in Europe, European Commission, DG Education and Culture, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission Europe 2020 a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (2013). Commercialising public research: New trends and strategies, Brussels.Google Scholar
  10. Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signaling. Research Policy, 35, 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Georghiou, L. (2001). Evolving frameworks for European collaboration in research and technology. Research Policy, 30, 891–903.Google Scholar
  12. Graff, G., Heimen, A., & Zilberman, D. (2002). University research and offices of technology transfer. California Management Review, 45, 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall, B. H. (2004). University-industry research partnerships in the United States. In J. Contzen, D. Gibson, & M. V. Heitor (Eds.), Rethinking science systems and innovation policies (pp. 1–31). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2001). Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). Universities as research partners. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hülsbeck, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Starnecker, A. (2013). Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance: the open method of co-ordination in innovation policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, Y. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: an empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lemola, T. (2002). Convergence of national science and technology policies: the case of finland. Research Policy, 3, 1481–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2013). Knowledge spillovers, collective entrepreneurship, and economic growth: the role of universities. Small Business Economics, 41, 797–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2014). Public sector entrepreneurship. New York: Oxford University Press (in production).Google Scholar
  22. Link, A. N., & Rees, J. (1990). Firm size, university-based research, and the returns to R&D. Small Business Economics, 2, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Link, A. N., & Ruhm, C. J. (2009). Bringing science to market: commercializing from NIH SBIR awards. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18, 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Link, A. N., & Wessner, C. W. (2011). Universities as research partners: Entrepreneurial explorations and exploitations. In D. Audretsch (Ed.), Handbook of research on innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 290–299). London: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy, 31, 1467–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. OECD (2013). Commercialising public research, new trends and strategies, Paris.Google Scholar
  28. Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre (S2BMRC, 2011). The State of European University-Business Cooperation Final Report - Study on the Cooperation between Higher Education Institutions and Public and Private Organisations in Europe, Münster, Germany.Google Scholar
  29. Sheehan, J., & Wyckoff, A. (2003). “Targeting R&D: Economic and policy omplications of increasing R&D spending,” STI Working Paper 2003/8, Science and Innovation Unit, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Soete, L. (2007). From industrial to innovation policy. Journal of Industrial Competitive Trade, 7, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Storey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). Public policy measure to support new technology based firms in the European Union. Research Policy, 26, 1037–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stuart, T. E., Ozdemir, S. Z., & Ding, W. W. (2007). Vertical alliance networks: the case of university-biotechnology-pharmaceutical alliance chains. Research Policy, 36, 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major U.S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zeckhauser, R. (1996). The challenge of contracting for technological information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 93, 12743–12748.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics and Whitaker InstituteNational University of Ireland, GalwayGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations