Geographical and cognitive proximity effects on innovation performance in SMEs: a way through knowledge acquisition

  • F. Xavier Molina-Morales
  • Pedro Manuel García-Villaverde
  • Gloria Parra-Requena
Article

Abstract

This study explores the relative influence of geographical and cognitive proximity to explain innovation performance. This paper deepens the controversy between the significance of both types of proximity, contributing to a better understand their interconnections. The study further analyzes to what extent knowledge acquisition provides a congruent explanation of the effectiveness of innovation in proximity contexts. The paper has tested a structural model based on a sample of 224 Spanish footwear firms. Footwear industry is a mature and traditional industry with a significant presence of the territorial agglomeration of firms all over Spain. Findings suggest both a direct and indirect effect of cognitive proximity on innovation performance. However, an excess of geographical proximity produces spatial lock-in, thus limiting the access to new knowledge and lowering innovations. By contrast, proximity in terms of goals and culture leads firms belonging to a territorial cluster to achieve knowledge acquisition resulting in relevant innovation. Findings suggest that although transferable valuable knowledge exists in clustered contexts firms should adopt a proactive behavior to have access common knowledge and in order to generate effective innovations.

Keywords

Geographical proximity Cognitive proximity Clusters Innovation Knowledge 

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in small and large firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78, 678–690.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., & McHale, J. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: labor flows, knowledge spillovers, and enduring social capital. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonelli, C. (2000). Collective knowledge communication and innovation: the evidence of technological districts. Regional Studies, 34, 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asociación Española de Componentes del Calzado-AEC (2008). INFOAEC Report.Elche: AEC (www.aec.es).
  6. Audretsch, D. (1998). Agglomeration and the location of economic activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 909–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27, 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becattini, G. (1979). Dal settore industriale al distretto industriale. Alcune considerazioni sull’unita di indagine dell’economia industriale. Rivista di Economia e Politica Industriale, 5(1), 7–21.Google Scholar
  11. Belso-Martínez, J. A. (2010). International outsourcing and partner location in the Spanish footwear sector: an analysis based in industrial district SMEs. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Best, M., & Forrant, R. (1996). Creating industrial capacity: Pentagon-led versus production-led industrial policies. In J. Michie & J. G. Smith (Eds.), Creating industrial capacity: Towards full employment (pp. 225–254). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Boix, R., & Galletto, V. (2006). Sistemas locales de trabajo y distritos industriales marshallianos en España. Economía Industrial, 359, 165–184.Google Scholar
  14. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cáceres, R., Guzmán, J., & Rekowsik, M. (2011). Firms as source of variety in innovation: influence of size and sector. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. doi: 10.1007/s11365-011-0198-8.
  16. Capello, R., & Faggian, A. (2005). Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. Regional Studies, 39, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Capó-Vicedo, J., Expósito-Langa, M., & Molina-Morales, F. X. (2008). Improving SME competitiveness reinforcing interorganisational networks in industrial clusters. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4, 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, N. 07–017. Sage, Beverly Hills, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Chen, C., & Huang, J. (2008). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—the mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62, 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modelling. MIS Quarterly, 22, 7–15.Google Scholar
  21. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absortive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Correia, I. M., & Petiz, O. (2007). Firms and universities—do spillovers enhance firm’s performance? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 3, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dakhli, M., & de Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multicountry study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 953–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dei Ottati, G. (2003). Trust, interlinking transactions and credit in the industrial district. In G. Becattini, M. Bellandi, G. Dei Ottati, & F. Sforzi (Eds.), From industrial district to local development. An itinerary of research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Dyer, J., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.Google Scholar
  28. Exposito-Langa, M., Molina-Morales, F. X., & Capó-Vicedo, J. (2011). New product development and absortive capability in industrial districts: a multidimensional approach. Regional Studies, 45, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron: The University of Akron.Google Scholar
  30. Feldman, M. (1994). The geography of innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fuentes, M. M., Ruiz, M., Bojica, A. M., & Fernandez, V. (2010). Prior knowledge and social networks in the exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(4), 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. General Section of Analysis, Strategy & Evaluation. (2009). El sector español del calzado. Boletín Económico de ICE, 2961, 3–18.Google Scholar
  34. Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour. Research Policy, 32, 715–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Galunic, C., & Rodan, D. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firms: knowledge structures and the potencial for Schumpeterian rents. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1193–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Giuliani, E., & Bell, M. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grant, R. M. (2000). Shifts in the world economy: The drivers of knowledge management. In C. Despres & D. Chauvel (Eds.), Knowledge horizonts: The present and the promise of knowledge management (pp. 27–53). Massachusetts: Butterworth-Heinemann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. A., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1984). Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A beginner’s guide to partial least squares analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hundley, G., & Jacobson, C. (1998). The effects of the keiretsu on the export performance of Japanese companies: help or hindrance? Strategic Management Journal, 19, 927–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Inkpen, A., & Tsang, E. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30, 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Pelmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: a literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 528–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marshall, A. (1925). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maula, M., Autio, E., & Murray, G. (2003). Prerequisites for the creation of social capital and subsequent knowledge acquisition in corporate venture capital. Venture Capital, 35, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1133–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mistri, M., & Solari, S. (2001). Social networks and productive connectance: modeling the organizational form of the industrial district. Human System Management, 20, 223–236.Google Scholar
  53. Molina-Morales, F. X., & Martínez-Fernández, M. T. (2010). Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 258–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and inter-firm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77–92.Google Scholar
  55. Muscio, A. (2006). Patterns of innovation in industrial districts: an empirical analysis. Industry and Innovation, 13, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  59. Parra-Requena, G., Molina-Morales, F. X., & García-Villaverde, P. M. (2010). The mediating effect of cognitive social capital on knowledge acquisition in clustered firms. Growth and Change, 41, 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Porter, M. (1998). Cluster and the economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–91.Google Scholar
  61. Rowley, T. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy Management Review, 22, 887–910.Google Scholar
  62. Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 595–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 907–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Staber, U. (2001). Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: the case of knitwear firms in Baden-Württemberg. Regional Studies, 35, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Storper, M. (1992). The limits to globalization: technology districts and international trade. Economic Geography, 68, 60–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32, 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tortajada, E., Fernandez, I., & Ybarra, J. (2005). Evolución de la industria española del calzado: factores relevantes en las últimas décadas. Economía Industrial, 355, 211–227.Google Scholar
  69. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Utterback, J. (1974). Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science, 183, 620–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Warren, L., Patton, D., & Bream, D. (2009). Knowledge acquisition processes during the incubation of new high technology firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(4), 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wuyts, S., Colomb, M. G., Dutta, S., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Empirical tests of optimal cognitive distance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58, 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ybarra, J. (2006). Los distritos industriales en el desarrollo local valenciano, XIV International EconomicHistoryCongress, Helsinki, 21–25 August.Google Scholar
  74. Yeoh, P., & Roth, K. (1999). An empirical analysis of sustained advantage in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry: impact of firms resources and capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 637–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 587–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Young-Ybarra, D., & Wiersema, M. (1999). Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: the influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theory. Organization Science, 10, 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and new venture performance: a study of corporate–sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhang, J., Di Benedetto, A., & Hoenig, S. (2009). Product development strategy, product innovation performance, and the mediating role of knowledge utilization: evidence from subsidiaries in China. Journal of International Marketing, 17, 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Xavier Molina-Morales
    • 1
  • Pedro Manuel García-Villaverde
    • 2
  • Gloria Parra-Requena
    • 2
  1. 1.Universitat Jaume ICastellon de la PlanaSpain
  2. 2.Universidad de Castilla-La ManchaAlbaceteSpain

Personalised recommendations