Entrepreneurial intentions, motivations and barriers: Differences among American, Asian and European students
- 2.2k Downloads
Should entrepreneurship education be the same in every country or should it be adapted to each context? In addition to answering this question, it appears to be important to identify the concerns students have regarding their entrepreneurship education programs, so as to strengthen their perceptions of feasibility and desirability of an entrepreneurial career. In this article we examine whether differences exist among American, Asian and European students in terms of entrepreneurial intentions and dispositions, as well as motivations and perceived barriers for business startup. Results indicate that entrepreneurial disposition and intentions differ by country but that students across countries are motivated and/or discouraged by similar variables. However, our results indicate that the levels of sensitivity to each motivator and barrier differ by country. Our results support the argument made by past researches that cultural differences should be taken into consideration when developing entrepreneurship education programs.
KeywordsEntrepreneurship education Cross-cultural Motivations Barriers Belgium US China India Spain
Frank Janssen and Olivier Giacomin wish to thank the Banque Nationale de Belgique for its financial support.
- Boissin, J. P., Branchet, B., Emin, S., & Herbert, J. I. (2009). Students and entrepreneurship: a comparative study of France and the United States. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 22(2), 101–122.Google Scholar
- Bosma, N., Jones, K., Autio, E. & Levie, J. (2007). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2007 Executive Report, Babson College and London business School.Google Scholar
- Fayolle, A., & Kickul, J. (2007). New and emerging perspectives for future research in entrepreneurship education. In A. Fayolle (Ed.), Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education, vol. 2 contextual perspectives (pp. 1–10). Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Filion, L. J. (2009). In B. Surlemont & P. Kearney (Eds.), Foreword. Brussels: De Boeck Université.Google Scholar
- Fiske, D. (1982). Convergent-discriminant validation in measurement and research strategy. In D. Brinsberg & L. Kidder (Eds.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral sciences: Forms of validity in research (pp. 77–92). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
- Genescá, E., & Veciana, J. M. (1984). Actitudes hacia la Creación de Empresas. Información Comercial Española, n°, 611, 147–155.Google Scholar
- Hsu, J. C. (1996). Multiple comparisons theory and methods. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91–104.Google Scholar
- Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
- Wilson, F., Marlino, D., & Kickul, J. (2004). Our entrepreneurial future: examining the diverse attitudes and motivations of teens across gender and ethnic identity. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 177–197.Google Scholar