Advertisement

The entrepreneurial motivation in academia: a multidimensional construct

  • Silvia T. Morales-GualdrónEmail author
  • Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia
  • Salvador Roig Dobón
Article

Abstract

In this paper we propose a model to analyse the motivation of academic entrepreneurs that comprises six dimensions: personal, relating to the entrepreneurial opportunity, to scientific knowledge, to the availability of resources, to the incubator organization, and to the social environment. The model is tested based on information from a survey administered to 152 Spanish academic entrepreneurs. Our results show that entrepreneurial opportunity is not part of the entrepreneurial motivation, but is of the utmost importance to academic entrepreneurs. Also, we find the scientific knowledge is the main driver of entrepreneurial activity in the academia.

Keywords

Academic spin-offs Motivation New ventures Technology transfer 

References

  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audretsch, D., & Kayalar-Erdem, D. (2004). Determinants of scientist entrepreneurship: An integrative research agenda. Discussion papers on entrepreneurship, growth and public policy, No. 2004-42, Max Planck Institute of economics, group for entrepreneurship, growth and public policy.Google Scholar
  3. Autio, E., & Kauranen, I. (1994). Technologist-entrepreneurs versus non-entrepreneurial technologists: analysis of motivational triggering factors. Entrepreneurship y Regional Development, 6, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  5. Bentler, P., & Bonett, D. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1994). A taxonomy of business start-up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carayannis, E. G., Rogers, E. M., Kurihara, K., & Allbritton, M. M. (1998). High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. Technovation, 18(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., & Gatewood, E. J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassar, G. (2007). Money, money, money? A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneur career reasons, growth preferences and achieved growth. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiesa, V., & Piccaluga, A. (2000). Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the chase of academic spin-offs companies in Italy. R & D Management, 30(4), 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chrisman, J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: the case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, A. C. (1985). The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, A., & Gimeno-Gascón, F. (1992). Entrepreneurs, processes of founding, and new firm performance. In D. L. Sexton & J. D. Kasarda (Eds.), The state of the art of Entrepreneurship (pp. 45–67). Boston: PWS-KENT.Google Scholar
  14. DiGregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doutriaux, J. (1991). University culture, spin-off strategy, and success of academic entrepreneurs at Canadian universities. In: Proceedings of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College Conference, 406–421.Google Scholar
  17. Doutriaux, J., & Dew, G. (1992). Motivation of academic entrepreneurs and spin-off development: analysis of regional and university effects through case studies. In: Proceedings of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College Conference, 231–232.Google Scholar
  18. Doutriaux, J., & Peterman, D. (1982). Technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship. In: Proceedings of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College Conference, 430–448.Google Scholar
  19. Dubini, P. (1988). The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: some hints for public policies. Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university—industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franzoni, C., & Lissoni, F. (2006). Academic entrepreneurship, patents and spin-offs: Critical issues and lessons for Europe. Centro di Ricerca sui Processi di Innovazione e Internazionalizzazione CESPRI, Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi. Working Paper No. 80.Google Scholar
  22. Gartner, W. B. (1988). Who is an Entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32.Google Scholar
  23. Hair, H. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Henrekson, M., & Rosenberg, N. (2000). Incentives for academic entrepreneurship and economic performance: Sweden and the United States. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones-Evans, D. (1998). Universities, technology transfer and spin-off activities—academia entrepreneurship in different European Regions. Targeted Socio-economic Research Project No. 1042. Final Report. University of Glamorgan, Business School, and European Commission. http://www.lambertreview.org.uk/pdffiles/uni/utheschoolforbusinandregiondevelreport.pdf.
  26. Kassicieh, S., Radosevich, R., & Banbury, C. (1997). Using attitudinal, situational, and personal characteristics variables to predict future entrepreneurs from national laboratory inventors. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 248–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 199–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landry, E., Amara, N., & Rherrand, I. (2006). Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities. Research Policy, 35(10), 1599–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laukannen, M. (2003). Exploring academic entrepreneurship: drivers and tensions of university based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(4), 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehrer, M., & Asakawa, K. (2004). Pushing scientists into the marketplace: promoting science entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 46(3), 55–76.Google Scholar
  31. Levin, S., & Stephan, P. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 114–130.Google Scholar
  32. Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34, 981–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Louis, K., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., & Stoto, M. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: behaviours among life scientist. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achievement society. Princenton, N.J: Von Nostrand.Google Scholar
  35. Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management, 33(2), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: a longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 31(6), 909–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. O’Shea, R., Allen, T., Morse, K., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2004). Universities and technology transfer: a review of academic entrepreneurship literature. Irish Journal of Management, 25(2), 11–29.Google Scholar
  39. Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. International Journal Technological Management, 10(7/8), 879–893.Google Scholar
  40. RedOtri de Universidades. (2007). Informe Red OTRI de Universidades, 2007. Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas, CRUE, Madrid.Google Scholar
  41. Roberts, E. (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Samsom, K., Gurdon, M. (1990). Entrepreneurial scientist: organizational performance in scientist-started high technology firms. In: Proceedings of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College Conference, 437–451Google Scholar
  43. Searle, C. (2006). Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Segal, G., Borgia, D., & Schoenfeld, J. (2005). The motivation to become an entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 11(1), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and wealth creation. Massachusetts: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
  46. Shane, S., & Khurana, R. (2003). Bringing individuals back in: the effects of career experience on new firm founding. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(3), 519–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academic of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shane, S., Kolvereid, L., & Westhead, P. (1991). An exploratory examination of the reasons leading to new firm formation across country and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shane, S., Locke, E., & Collins, C. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shapero, A. (1984). The entrepreneurial event. In C. A. Kent (Ed.), The environment for entrepreneurship. Massachussets: Lexington Books D.C. Heath and Company Lexington.Google Scholar
  51. Steffensen, M., Rogers, E. M., & Speakman, K. (2000). Spin-off from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stephan, P. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1199–1235.Google Scholar
  53. Vila, N., Küster, I. & Aldás, J. (2000). Desarrollo y validación de escalas de medida en Marketing, Quadern de Treball, n 104 (nova època), Facultat d`Economia, Universitat de València. Google Scholar
  54. Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high technology spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weatherston, J. (1995). Academic Entrepreneurs: Is a spin-off Company too risky?. International Council for Small Business (ICSB). http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/icsb/1995/pdf/20.pdf.
  56. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  57. Zhang, J. (2006). A study of academic entrepreneurs using venture capital data. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), IZA Discussion Papers No. 2992. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia T. Morales-Gualdrón
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia
    • 2
  • Salvador Roig Dobón
    • 3
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering Department, University of AntioquiaMedellínColombia
  2. 2.Ingenio (CSIC-UPV), Institute of Innovation and Knowledge ManagementCiudad Politécnica de la InnovaciónValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Instituto Universitario de Economía Social y Cooperativa (IUDESCOOP)University of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations