Advertisement

Market entry of firms with different legal forms: an empirical test of the influence of institutional factors

  • Saioa Arando
  • Iñaki Peña
  • Ingrid Verheul
Article

Abstract

Drawing upon institutional theory we develop a conceptual model and investigate the determinants of market entry for worker cooperatives, publicly traded and limited-liability companies. Our results show that formal institutional conditions (i.e., mercantile legislation) influence the start-up choice of entrepreneurs regarding the legal form of their new venture. In addition, we take into account the influence of informal institutional conditions (i.e., local corporate culture) on the market entry rate of firms with different legal structures. Findings show that, while market entry is sensitive to the general economic climate, entry rates of firms with a different legal structure respond differently to the same economic conditions.

Keywords

Market entry Institutional theory Legal structure New ventures Entrepreneurship 

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1989). Births and firm size. Southern Economic Journal, 2, 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Arenius, M., & Hay, M. (2004). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2004 Executive Report. London: Babson College and London Business School.Google Scholar
  4. Alañon, A., Arauzo, J. M. & Myro, R. (2005). Accessibility and Industrial Location. Some Evidence from Spain. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Firm Demography and Industrial Location, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Reus.Google Scholar
  5. Aranguren, M. J. (1999). Determinants of economic units creation in the period 1985–93. The case of the manufacturing industry in CAPV. Small Business Economics, 12, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aranguren, M. J., Audretsch, D., & Callejón, M. (2005). Empresarialidad: ¿Contribucion al crecimiento y al bienestar económico?” In M. D. Parrilli, P. Bianchi, & R. Sudgen (Eds.), Alta tecnología, productividad y redes. Un enfoque sistémico para el desarrollo de las pequeñas y medianas empresas. Colegio de Tlaxcala Press, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  7. Armington, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36(1), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38, 949–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B., Carree, M. A., van Stel, A. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2006). Does self-employment reduce unemployment?, Max Planck Discussion Paper on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy #0705. Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics.Google Scholar
  11. Ben-Ner, A. (1988). Comparative empirical observations on worker-owned and capitalist firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 6, 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blanchflower, D., & Meyer, B. (1994). A longitudinal analysis of young entrepreneurs in Australia and the United States. Small Business Economics, 6(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bregger, J. E. (1996). Measuring self-employment in the United States. Monthly Labor Review, 119(1), 3–9.Google Scholar
  14. Callejón, M., & Segarra, A. (1999). Business dynamics and efficiency in industries and regions. The Case of Spain. Small Business Economics, 13, 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carree, M. A. (2002). Does unemployment affect the number of establishments? A Regional Analysis for US States. Regional Studies, 36, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carree, M. A., van Stel, A. J., Thurik, A. R., & Wennekers, A. R. M. (2002). Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics, 19, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2006). Understanding the role of entrepreneurship for economic growth. In M. A. Carree, & A. R. Thurik (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth, International Library of Entrepreneurship (pp. ix–xix). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Carree, M. A., Santarelli, E., & Verheul, I. (2008). Firm entry and exit in italian provinces and the relationship with unemployment. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1992). The trade-off between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress. Small Business Economics, 4, 1–14.Google Scholar
  20. Cuervo, A. (2005). Individual and environmental determinants of entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Craig, B., & Pencavel, J. (1992). The behavior of worker cooperatives: The plywood companies of the Pacific Northwest. American Economic Review, 82(5), 1083–1105.Google Scholar
  22. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (1997). Values, beliefs and regional variations in new firm formation rates. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidsson, P., Lindmark, L., & Olofsson, C. (1994). New firm formation and regional development in Sweden. Regional Studies, 28, 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diaz, J. C., Hernandez, R., & Urbano, D. (2007). Hacia un modelo institucional de creación de empresas. Boletín de Estudios Económicos, LXI(189), 495–522.Google Scholar
  25. Dixon, L., Gates, S. M., Kapur, K., Seabury, S. A., & Talley, E. (2007). The impact of regulation and litigation on small businesses and entrepreneurship: An overview. In S. M. Gates, & K. J. Leuschner (Eds.), In the name of entrepreneurship? The logic and effects of special regulatory treatment for small business (pp. 17–68). Pittsburgh, PA: Kauffman–Rand Institute for Entrepreneurship Public Policy.Google Scholar
  26. Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1990). The determinants of changes in US self-employment 1968–1987. Small Business Economics, 1(2), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Culture and its consequences for entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 5–8.Google Scholar
  28. Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S. (1994). Environments for entrepreneurship development: Key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 43–62.Google Scholar
  31. Halary, I. (2006). Co-operatives in globalization: The advantages of networking. Advantages in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labour-managed Firms, 9, 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harhoff, D. (1998). Are there financing constraints for R&D and investment in German manufacturing firms? Annales d’Economie et the Statistique, 49/50, 421–456.Google Scholar
  33. Harhoff, D., Stahl, K., & Woywode, M. (1998). Legal form, growth and exit of West German firms—Empirical results for manufacturing, construction, trade and service industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, XLVI(4), 453–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henrekson, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and institutions. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 28(4), 717–742.Google Scholar
  35. Karlsson, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). Introduction to institutions, entrepreneurship and firm growth: The case of Sweden. Small Business Economics, 19, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kremer, M. (1997). Why are worker cooperatives so rare?, NBER Working Paper 6118. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  37. Kuznetz, S. (1966). Modern economic growth: Rate, structure and spread. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, Z. J. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies, 38, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. López-Garcia, P., & Puente, S. (2006). Business demography in Spain: Determinants of firm survival. Documentos de Trabajo no. 0608. Madrid: Banco de España.Google Scholar
  40. Malach, S., Robinson, P., & Radcliffe, T. (2006). Differentiating legal issues by business type. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(4), 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morales, L., & Peña, I. (2003). Dinamismo de Nuevas Empresas y Clusters Naturales. Evidencia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco 1993–1999. Ekonomiaz, 53, 160–183.Google Scholar
  42. Mueller, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship in the region: Breeding ground for nascent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 27(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. North, D. (1993). Economic performance through time. American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.Google Scholar
  45. Pérotin, V. (2006). Entry, exit and the business cycle. Are cooperatives different? Journal of Comparative Economics, 34, 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Podivinsky, J. M., & Stewart, G. (2007). Why is labour-managed firm entry so rare? An analysis of UK manufacturing data. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 63, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Porter, M. E. (1999). Clusters and new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.Google Scholar
  48. Reynolds, P. D., Miller, B., & Maki, W. R. (1995). Explaining regional variations in business births and deaths. U.S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics, 7, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ritsilä, J., & Tervo, H. (2002). Effects of unemployment on new firm formation: Micro-level panel data evidence from Finland. Small Business Economics, 19, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saxenian, A. (1990). Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 33, 89–111.Google Scholar
  51. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Shapiro, D., & Khemani, R. S. (1987). The determinants of entry and exit reconsidered. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 5, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Siegfried, J. J., & Evans, L. B. (1994). Empirical studies of entry and exit: A survey of the evidence. Review of Industrial Organization, 9, 121–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, S. C. (2001). Blooming together or wilting alone? Network externalities and mondragón and la lega co-operative networks. Discussion Paper 2001/27. Helsinki, Finland: United Nations University, Wider.Google Scholar
  55. Staber, U. (1993). Worker cooperatives and the business cycle. Are cooperatives the answer to unemployment? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 52(2), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Storey, D. J. (1991). The births of new firms. does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 3(3), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Storey, D. J. (1999). Six steps to heaven: Evaluating the impact of public policies to support small business in developed economies. In D. L. Sexton, & H. Landström (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 176–194). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Urbano, D. (2006). La Creación de Empresas en Cataluña: Organismos de Apoyo y Actitudes Hacia la Actividad Emprendedora. Catalonia: Generalitat de Catalunya, Departamento de Trabajo e Industria.Google Scholar
  59. van Stel, A. J., & Storey, D. J. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: Is there a Upas tree effect? Regional Studies, 38(8), 893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Veciana, J. M. (1999). Creación de Empresas como programa de investigación científica. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8(3), 11–36.Google Scholar
  61. Verheul, I., Wennekers, A. R. M., Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2002). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: Policies, institutions and culture. In D. B. Audretsch, A. R. Thurik, I. Verheul, & A. R. M. Wennekers (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European–US comparison (pp. 11–81). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Westhead, P., & Moyes, T. (1992). Reflections on thatcher’s Britain: Evidence from new production firm registrations 1980–88. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4(1), 21–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yamawaki, H. (1991). The effect of business conditions on net entry. Evidence from Japan. In P. Geroski, & J. Schwalbach (Eds.),Entry and market contestability. An international comparison (pp. 168–186). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Management, Basque Institute of CompetitivenessUniversity of DeustoDonostiaSpain
  2. 2.Rotterdam School of Economics, Centre for Advanced Small Business EconomicsErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations