Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

How clusters can encourage entrepreneurship and venture creation. Reasons and advantages

  • 656 Accesses

  • 12 Citations

Abstract

The aim of this article is to define what is meant by clusters, their characteristics or determinants and the advantages they generate, focusing on the role they play in boosting entrepreneurship and new venture creation. In clusters, a balance is reached between cooperation and competition which becomes evident in the higher productivity of the companies because of their increased access to inputs, information, technology and institutions; or in greater innovation and venture creation. The cluster incentivizes the entry of new companies or start-ups. The hope is, then, that the new companies will revitalize specific regions where competitiveness has fallen and that entrepreneurship will contribute to economic development and improved country-wide competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    When companies cooperate with one another but are not geographically close, we speak of organizational networks.

  2. 2.

    These approaches are not mutually exclusive since entrepreneurial activity is a human based activity; it does not occur spontaneously within the context of the economic environment, institutions, technological, regulatory or demographic change (Shane 2003: 2).

  3. 3.

    The studies of Costa-Campí (1988) and Ybarra (1991) provide a first approach to the identification of industrial districts in the cases of Catalonia and the Valencia Autonomous Region.

  4. 4.

    This study was previously published as Working Paper (no. 05/14) in the Department of Applied Economics at the Autonoma University of Barcelona in 2005.

  5. 5.

    Hernández et al. (2005) use the same methodology as Boix and Galleto (2006), although with certain adjustments, for Catalonia.

  6. 6.

    Countering the argument that defends the importance of geographical location, other authors stress that, especially in developed countries, there are other important factors which explain companies’ results, apart from their location, or that, at any rate, only in periods of economic recession are companies especially influenced by their location (Davidsson 1989).

References

  1. Aldrich, H. E., & Wiedenmayer, G. (1993). From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational founding. In J. Katz, & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in enterpreneurship, firm emergence and growth (pp. 145–195). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  2. Almazan, A., Motta, A., & Titman, S. (2006). Firm location and the creation and utilization of human capital. Review of Economics Studies, 74(4), 1305–1327.

  3. Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competition technologies, increasing returns and lock-in historical events. Economic Journal, 99, 116–131.

  4. Arthur, W. B. (1990). Silicon valley locational clusters—when do increasing returns imply monopoly. Mathematical Social Sciences, 19, 235–251.

  5. Audretsch, D. B. (1998). Agglomerarion and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14, 18–29.

  6. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R & D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American EconomicReview, 86(3), 630–640.

  7. Aydalot, P. (1986). Milieux Innovateurs in Europe. Paris: GREMI.

  8. Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more. Research Policy, 27, 525–540.

  9. Becattini, G. (1979). Sectors and/or districts: Some remarks on the conceptual foundations of industrial economics. Rivista di Economia e Politica Industriale, 1, 123–135.

  10. Becattini, G. (1989). Sectors and/or districts: Some remarks on the conceptual foundations of industrial economics. In E. Goodman, et al. (Ed.) Small firms and industrial districts in Italy (pp. 123–135). London: Routledge.

  11. Becattini, G. (2006). Vicisitudes y potencialidades de un concepto: El Distrito industrial. Economía Industrial, 359, 21–27.

  12. Boix, R., & Galletto, V. (2006). Sistemas locales de trabajo y distritos industriales marshallianos en España. Economía Industrial, 359, 165–184.

  13. Brusco, S. (1992). Small firms and the provision of real services. In F. Pyke, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.) Industrial districts and local economic regeneration. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.

  14. Camagni, R. (1991). ‘Local Milieu’, uncertainty and innovation networks: Towards a new dynamic theory of economic space. In Camagni (Ed.) Innovation networks. Spatial perspectives (pp. 121–143). London: Belhaven.

  15. Carlsson, B. (2002). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and growth: biomedicine and polymers in Sweden and Ohio. Small Business Review, 19, 105–121.

  16. Cawthorne, P. M. (1995). Of networks and markets: The rise and rise of a South Indian town, the example of tiruppur’s cotton knitwear industry. World Develop, 23, 43–56.

  17. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  18. Conti, S., Malecki, E., & Oinas, P. E. (1995). The industrial enterprise and its environment: spatial perspective. Aldershot: Avebury.

  19. Costa, D., & Kahn, M. (2001). Power copules. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1287–1315.

  20. Costa-Campi, M. T. (1988). Descentramiento productivo y difusión industrial. El modelo de especialización flexible. Papeles de Economía Española, 35, 251–276.

  21. Czamanski, D., & Ablas, L. A. (1979). Identification of industrial clusters and complexes: a comparison of methods and findings. Urban Studies, 16, 61–80.

  22. Davidsson, P. (1989). Continued entrepreneurship and small firm growth. Stockholm: Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics.

  23. Diamond, C., & Simon, C. (1990). Industrial specialization and the returns to labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 8(2), 175–201.

  24. Dosi, G. (1988). The nature of the innovative process. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 221–238). New York: Printer.

  25. Dumais, G., Ellison, G., & Blaeser, E. (2002). Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 193–204.

  26. Feldman, M. P. (1994). The geography of innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

  27. Feser, E. J., & Bergman, E. M. (2000). National industry cluster templates: a framework for applied regional cluster analysis. Regional Studies, 34(1), 1–19.

  28. Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Vanables, A. (1999). The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  29. Glassman, U., & Voelzkow, H. (2001). The governance of local economies in germany. In C. Crouch, P. Le Gales, C. Trigilia, & H. Voelzkow (Eds.) Local production systems in Europe. rise or demise (pp. 79–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  30. Hernández, J. M., Fontrodona, J., & Pezzi, A. (2005). Mapa dels sistemas productius locals industrials a Catalunya. Papers d’Economia Industrial, 21. Catalonia: Generalitat de Catalunya.

  31. Holmes, T. (1999). Localization of industry and vertical disintegration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(2), 314–325.

  32. Hull, D. L., Bosley, J. J., Udell, G. G. (1980). Renewing the hunt for the Neffalump: Identifying potential entrepreneurs by personality characteristics. Journal of Small Business, 18(1), 11–18.

  33. Iturrioz Landart, C., Aranguren Querejeta, M. J., Aragón Amonarriz, C., & Larrea Aranguren, M. (2005). La política industrial de cluster/redes mejora realmente la competitividad empresarial? Resultados de la evaluación de dos experiencias en la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi. Ekonomiaz, 60, 10–61.

  34. Ivarsson, I. (1999). Competitive industry clusters and inward tnc investments: the case of Sweden. Regional Studies, 33(1), 37–49.

  35. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographical localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63, 577–598.

  36. Johannisson, B., Ramirez-Pasillas, M., & Karlsson, G. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: a leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 14, 297–315.

  37. Khan, J. H., & Ghani, J. A. (2004). Clusters and entrepreneurship: implications for innovation in a developing economy. Journal of Development Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 221–238.

  38. Khilstrom, R., & Laffont, J. J. (1979). A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87(4), 719–748.

  39. Krugman, P. (1991). Trade and geography. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  40. Lemarié, S., Mangematin, V., & Torre, A. (2001). Is the creation and development of biotech SMEs localized? Conclusions drawn from the French case. Small Business Economics, 17, 61–76.

  41. Lundvall, B., & Maskell, P. (2000). Nation states and economic development: from national systems of knowledge creation and learning. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, & M. S. Gertler (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 353–372). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  42. Maillat, D. (1996). Regional productive systems and innovative millieux. In Networks of enterprises and local development (Chapter 3). Paris: OECD.

  43. Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (1997). Towards and explanation of regional specialization and industry agglomeration. European Planning Studies, 5(1), 25–42.

  44. McClelland, D. C. (1961). La sociedad ambiciosa. Madrid: Guadarrama.

  45. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan.

  46. Meyer-Stamer, J. (1995). Micro-level innovations and competitiveness. World Develop, 23, 143–148.

  47. Mitxeo Grajinera, J., Idigoras Gamboa, I., & Vicente Molina, A. (2004). Los clusters como fuente de competitividad: El caso de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco. Cuadernos de Gestión, 4(1), 55–67.

  48. Muizer, A., & Hospers, G. J. (2000). SMEs in regional industry clusters. the impact of it and the knowledge economy. Zoetermeer: EIM.

  49. Mytelka, L., & Farinelli, F. (2000). Local clusters, innovation systems and sustained competitiveness. Working Paper, Institute for New Technoliges. The Netherlands: United Nations University.

  50. Navarro, (2003). Análisis y política de clusters: Teoría y realidad. Ekonomiaz, 53, 14–49.

  51. Nelson, R. R. (1999). The sources of industrial leadership: a perspective on industrial policy. The Economist, 147, 1–18.

  52. O’Donoghue, D., & Gleave, B. (2004). A note on methods for measuring industrial agglomeration. Regional Studies, 34, 419–427.

  53. Paniccia, I. (1998). One, a hundred, thousands of industrial districts. Organizational variety of local networks of small and medium-sized enterprises. Organization Studies, 4(19), 667–699.

  54. Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. H. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

  55. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.

  56. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

  57. Porter, M. E. (2001). Enhancing the microeconomic foundations of prosperity: the current competitiveness index. In K. Schwab, M. Porter, & J. Sachs (Eds.) The global competitiveness report 2001–2002 (pp. 52–73). New York: Oxford University Press.

  58. Pouder, R., & St John, C. H. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1192–1225.

  59. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy. Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.

  60. Prevenzer, M. (1997). The dynamics of industrial clustering in biotechnology. Small Business Economics, 9, 255–271.

  61. Pyke, F., & Sengenberger, W. (1992). Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.

  62. Rocha, H. O. (2002). Entrepreneurship and development through clusters: A theorical model. Paper presented at the British Academy of Management Conference, London.

  63. Rocha, H. O. (2004). Entrepreneurship and dvelopment: the role of clusters. a literature review. Small Business Economics, 23(5), 363–400.

  64. Rocha, H. O., & Sternberg, R. (2005). Entrepreneurship: the role of clusters theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence from Germany. Small Business Economics, 24, 267–292.

  65. Romanelli, E. (1989). Organization birth and population variety: A community perspective on origins. In B. Staw, & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organization behavior (pp. 211–246). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  66. Romanelli, E., & Schoonhoven, K. (2001). The local origins of new firms. In K. Schoonhoven & E. Romanelli (Eds.), The entrepreneurial dynamic (pp. 40–67). Stanfors, US: Stanfors University Press.

  67. Sabel, C. H., & Zeitlin, J. (1985). Historical alternatives to mass production: politics, markets, and technology in 19th century industrialization. Past and Present, 108, 133–176.

  68. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  69. Scott, A. (1988). New industrial spaces: Flexible production organization and regional development in North America and Western Europe. London: Pion.

  70. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltelham UK: Edward Elgar.

  71. Soler, V. (2001). Verificación de las hipótesis del efecto distrito. Economía Industrial, 334, 13–23.

  72. Soler, V. (2006). Nuevas técnicas para la medición del efecto distrito en las aglomeraciones industriales. Economía Industrial, 359, 81–87.

  73. Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424–462.

  74. Sternberg, R., & Litzenberger, T. (2004). Regional clusters in Germany. Their geography and their relevance for entrepreneurial activities. European Planning Studies, 12(6), 767–791.

  75. Storper, M. (1997). The regional world. New York: Guilford.

  76. Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (1989). The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes. In J. Wolch, & M. E. Dear (Eds.) The power of geography: How territory shapes social life (pp. 25–43). London: Unwin Hyman.

  77. Trullén Thomas, J. (2006). Distritos industriales marshallianos y sistemas locales de gran empresa en el diseño de una nueva estrategia territorial para el crecimiento de la productividad en la economía española. Economía Industrial, 359, 95–112.

  78. Van de Ven, A. H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 211–230.

  79. Westlund, H., & Bolton, R. (2003). Local social capital and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21(2), 77–113.

  80. Yamawaki, H. (2002). The evolution and structure of industrial clusters in Japan. Small Business Economics, 18, 121–140.

  81. Ybarra, J. A. (1991). Determinación cuantitativa de distritos industriales: La experiencia del País Valenciano. Estudios Territoriales, 37, 55–67.

  82. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. (1998a). Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets. Economic Inquiry, 36, 65–86.

  83. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998b). Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper has been supported by Cátedra Bancaja-Universidad Complutense de Madrid “Jóvenes Emprendedores” and the Project CCG06-UCM-HUM-1052 of the Complutense University of Madrid.

Author information

Correspondence to Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romero-Martínez, A.M., Montoro-Sánchez, Á. How clusters can encourage entrepreneurship and venture creation. Reasons and advantages. Int Entrep Manage J 4, 315–329 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0079-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Clusters
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Venture creation
  • Industrial districts