Influence of social network structure on entrepreneurship participation—A study of 20 national cultures

Article

Abstract

By investigating differences in social networks among entrepreneurs in 20 cultures, this paper contributes to the debate on whether there is universality in the process of entrepreneurial networking. Representative samples of entrepreneurs were identified in the same manner in 20 countries from 2000 to 2004 (N = 304,560). The sampling methodologies and the questions asked were similar across all countries. Logistic regression was used to test for significant regional interaction effects involving personally knowing an entrepreneur. Results are contrary to the existence of any mono-dimensional form of networking practice but do strongly support the existence of both variform universality (culture moderates the importance of networking) and functional universality (cultural similarities in networking practice exist).

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Social network Global entrepreneurship monitor (GEM) Culture Universality 

References

  1. Aldrich, H. E., Reese, P. R., & Dubini, P. (1989). Women on the verge of a breakthrough?: Networking among entrepreneurs in the US and Italy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1, 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H. E., & Sakano, T. (1995). Unbroken ties: How the personal networks of Japanese business owners compare to those in other nations. In M. Fruid (Ed.), Networks and markets: Pacific rim investigations (pp. 17–45). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H. E., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). New York: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  4. Ardichvili, A., & Cardozo, R. (2000). A model of the entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 8, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arenius, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2006). Similarities and differences across the factors associated with women’s self-employment preference in the Nordic countries. International Small Business Journal, 24, 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birley, S., Cromie, S., & Meyer, A. (1991). Entrepreneurial networks: Their emergence in Ireland and Overseas. International Small Business Journal, 9, 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1983). Forms of capital. In J. Richarson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes—The social structure of competition. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cozby, P. (1997). Methods in behavior research. London: Mayfield Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  11. Cuervo, A. (2005). Individual and environmental determinants of entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Clercq, D., & Arenius, P. (2006). The role of knowledge in business start-up activity. International Small Business Journal, 24, 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dickson, M. W., den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 729–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dodd, S. D., Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). Scottish entrepreneurial networks in the international context. International Small Business Journal, 20, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dodd, S. D., & Patra, E. (2002). National differences in entrepreneurial networking. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, L. C., & Ruan, D. (1997). An international comparative study of interpersonal behaviour and role relationships. L’Annee Sociologique, 47, 89–115.Google Scholar
  19. Gartner, W. B. (1993). Words lead to deeds: Towards an organizational emergence vocabulary. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greve, A. (1995). Networks and entrepreneurship—An analysis of social relations, occupational background, and use of contacts during the establishment process. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen, E. L. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organizational growth. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 19, 7–19.Google Scholar
  24. Hmieleski, K. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2006). Proclivity for improvisation as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship—A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Saga Publication.Google Scholar
  27. Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Jenssen, J. I. (2001). Social networks, resources and entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2, 103–109.Google Scholar
  29. Johannisson, B., & Mønsted, M. (1997). Contextualizing entrepreneurial networking—The case of Scandinavia. International Studies of Management and Organization, 27(3), 109–136.Google Scholar
  30. Johannisson, B., & Nilsson, A. (1989). Community entrepreneurs: Networking for local development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, D. Y., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2001). The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital—A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Matthews, C. H., & Moser, S. B. (1995). Family background and gender: Implications for interest in small firm ownership. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7, 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Menzies, T. V., Doichon, M., Gasse, Y., & Elgie, S. (2006). A longitudinal study of the characteristic, business creation process and outcome differences of Canadian female vs. male nascent entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Minniti, M., Arenius, P., & Langowit, N. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2004 report on women and entrepreneurship. Boston: Babson College and London Business School.Google Scholar
  36. Minniti, M., Bygrave, W. D., & Errko, A. (2006). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2005 Executive report. Boston: Babson College and London Business School.Google Scholar
  37. Morales-Gualdron, S. T., & Roig, S. (2005). The new venture decision: An analysis based on the GEM project database. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1, 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ripolles, M., & Blesa, A. (2005). Personal networks as fosterers of entrepreneurial orientation in new ventures. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6, 239–248.Google Scholar
  39. Runyan, R. C., Huddleston, P., & Swinney, J. (2006). Entrepreneurial orientation and social capital as small firm strategies: A study of gender differences from a resource-based view. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2, 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanders, J., & Nee, V. (1996). Immigrant self-employment: The family as social capital and the value of human capital. American Sociological Review, 61, 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singh, R. P. (2000). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition through social networks. London: Garland Publiching, Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Staber, U., & Aldrich, H. E. (1995). Cross-national similarities in the personal networks of small business owners: A comparison of two regions in North America. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 20, 441–461.Google Scholar
  44. Welter, F., & Kautonen, T. (2005). Trust, social networks and enterprise development: exploring evidence from East and West Germany. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship ManagementUniversity of Southern DenmarkKoldingDenmark
  2. 2.Australian Graduate School of EntrepreneurshipSwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Life and Social SciencesSwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia

Personalised recommendations