Advertisement

The New Venture Decision: An Analysis Based on the GEM Project Database

  • Silvia T. Morales-Gualdrón
  • Salvador RoigEmail author
Article

Abstract

The new venture decision is a crucial stage in the process of creating a new business and is influenced by a series of social, demographic, cultural and economic factors, amongst others. These factors have been the subject of several studies, though there is still no widely accepted agreement on exactly how they affect the decision to create a new enterprise. This study will provide evidence on which variables affect the new venture decision, as well as the extent of their influence based on the analysis of a sample of 7524 cases, using information obtained via the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2001 Project. At the same time, we provide evidence to show that there are differences in the way these variables affect new ventures born out of need or out of opportunity.

Keywords

entrepreneurship business creation entrepreneurial decision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acs, Z.J., Arenius, P., Hary, M. & Minniti, M. 2004. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2004 Executive Report. Babson College and London Business School. http://www.gemconsortium.org/download/1122314683312/GEM_2004_Exec_Report.pdf 02/20/2005
  2. Aldrich, H. & Zimmer, C. 1985. Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D.L. Sexton & R.W. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship: 3–23. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  3. Ashcroft, B., Holden, D. & Low, K. 2004. Potential entrepreneurs and the self employment choice decision. Strathclyde Discussion papers in Economics, No. 04–16, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde, Glasglow, UK. http://www.strath.ac.uk/economics/research/pdf/strathecon04-16.pdf 02/18/2005
  4. Audretsch, D. 2002. Entrepreneurship: A Survey of the Literature. Institute for Development Strategies, Indiana University & Centre for Economic Policy. Research (CEPR). Prepared for the European Commission, Enterprise Directorate General. London. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/entrepreneurship/green_paper/literature_survey_2002.pdf 02/18/2005
  5. Bandura, A. 1986. The social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bird, B. 1988. Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intentions. Academy of Management Review, 13: 442–454.Google Scholar
  7. Brockhaus, R. 1980. Risk taking propensity of Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 509–520.Google Scholar
  8. Brockhaus, R. & Horwitz, P. 1986. The psychology of the entrepreneur. In D. Sexton & R. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship: 25–48. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, A.C. & Gimeno-Gascón, J. 1992. Entrepreneurs, processes of Founding, and New Firm Performance. In Donald L. Sexton & John D. Kasarda (Eds.), The state of the art of Entrepreneurship: 45–67. Boston, MA: PWS-KENT Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Davidsson, P. 1995. Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions. Paper presented at the RENT IX Workshop in Entrepreneurship Research, November 23–24, Piacenza, Italy.Google Scholar
  11. De Irala, J., Fernández-Crehuez, R. & Serrano, A. 1997. Intervalos de confianza anormalmente amplios en regresión logística: Interpretación de resultados de programas estadísticos. Public Health, 1: 230–233.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, D.S. & Leighton, L.S. 1989. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. The American Economic Review, 79: 519–535.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, D. & Leighton, L. 1990. Small Business formation by unemployment and employed workers. Small Business Economics, 2: 319–330.Google Scholar
  14. Ferrán, M. 1996. SPSS para Windows. Programación y análisis estadístico. Madrid: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Gartner, W.B. 1985. A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation. The Academy of Management Review, 10: 696–706.Google Scholar
  16. Gnyawali, D.R. & Fogel, D.S. 1994. Environments for Entrepreneurship development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18: 43–62.Google Scholar
  17. Hair, J., Roldh, E., Taham, R. & Black, W. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Fifth Edition. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Kihlstrom, R.E. & Laffont, J.J. 1979. A general Equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87: 719–748.Google Scholar
  19. Kirzner, I. 1979: Perception, opportunity and profit: Studies in the theory of entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Krueger, N. & Brazeal, D. 1994. Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 18: 91–104.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, D.Y. & Tsang, E.W. 2001. The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth. Journal of Management Studies, 38: 583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pinillos, J. 2003. Una aproximación a la percepción del riesgo en la creación de empresas. In E. Genescá, D. Urbano, J.L. Capelleras, C. Guallarte & J. Vergés, (Eds.), Creación de empresas. Entrepreneurship. Homenaje al profesor José María Veciana Vergés: 49–73. Barcelona, España: Servei de Publicacions Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  23. Reynolds, P., Camp, M., Bygrave, W., Autio, E. & Hay, M. 2001. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2001. Summary report. London School and Babson College. http://www.gemconsortium.org/document.asp?id=189 11/10/2004
  24. Reynolds, P., Levie, J. & Autio, E. 1999. Data collection-Analysis Strategies Operations Manual. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 1999. Babson College and the London Business School – Draft for GEM Team Review and Comment. http://www.gemconsortium.org/document.asp?id=280 11/10/2004
  25. Reynolds, P.D., Carter, N., Gartner, W. B. & Greence, P. 2004. The prevalence of Nascent entrepreneurs In the United States: Evidence from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23: 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarasvathy, S.D. 2004. The question we ask and the questions we are care about: Reformulating some problems in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 707–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Oxford University Press: New York. [Printed in: 1964].Google Scholar
  28. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academic of management Review, 25: 217–226.Google Scholar
  29. Shapero, A. 1984. The entrepreneurial event. In Calvin A. Kent (Ed.), The environment for entrepreneurship: 21–40. Toronto, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  30. Shapero, A. & Sokol, L. 1982. The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton & K.H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship: 72–90. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Singh, R. & Lucas, L. 2005. Not just domestic engineers: An exploratory study of homemaker entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29: 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Storey, D.J. 1994. Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Stuart, R.W. & Abetti, P.A. 1990. Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 5: 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Veciana, J.M. 1988. Empresari i procés de creació d'empreses. Revista Econòmica de Catalunya, 8: 53–67.Google Scholar
  35. Veciana, J.M. 1999. Creación de empresas como programa de investigación científica. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8: 11–36.Google Scholar
  36. Venkataraman, S. 1997. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.) Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, vol. 3: 119–138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  37. Yusuf, A. 1995. Critical success factors for small business: Perceptions of South Pacific entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 33: 68–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AntioquiaMedellínColombia
  2. 2.Edificio Departamental OrientalUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations