Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Latent and Actual Entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some Recent Developments

Abstract

This paper uses 2004 survey data from the 15 old EU member states and the US to explain country differences in latent and actual entrepreneurship. Other than demographic variables such as gender, age and education, the set of covariates includes the perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of financial support and of risk tolerance as well as country-specific effects. A comparison is made with results using a similar survey in 2000. While a majority of the surveyed population identifies lack of financial support as an obstacle to starting a new business, the role of this variable in both latent and actual entrepreneurship appears to be even more counterintuitive in 2004 than in 2000: it has no impact on actual entrepreneurship and is positively related to latent entrepreneurship. Administrative complexities, also perceived as an obstacle by a large majority of the population, have the expected negative impact both for latent and actual entrepreneurship in both years. Country-specific effects are important both for latent and actual entrepreneurship and the comparison of 2000 and 2004 results suggests that, once all other factors are controlled for, an improvement in actual entrepreneurship in the EU relative to the US has taken place in the last four years. However, in terms of unweighted averages actual entrepreneurship remained about the same. Latent entrepreneurship dropped while this drop seems to have occurred evenly in the US and the EU member states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acs, Z.J., Arenius, P., Hay, M. & Minniti, M. 2005. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2004 executive report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College & London: London Business School.

  2. Audretsch, D.B., Carree, M.A., van Stel, A.J. & Thurik, A.R. 2002. Impeded industrial restructuring: The growth penalty. Kyklos, 55(1): 81–97.

  3. Audretsch, D.B., Carree, M.A., Thurik, A.R. & van Stel, A.J. 2005. Does self-employment reduce unemployment. Discussion paper D5057. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

  4. Audretsch, D.B. & Thurik, A.R. 2001. What is new about the new economy: Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1): 267– 315.

  5. Audretsch, D.B. & Thurik, A.R. 2004. A model of the entrepreneurial economy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2: 143–166.

  6. Barreto, H. 1989. The entrepreneur in economic theory; Disappearance and explanation. London, Routledge.

  7. Bates, T. 1990. Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72: 551–559.

  8. Baumol, W.J. 1968. Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 58(2): 64–71.

  9. Beugelsdijk, S. & Noorderhaven, N. 2005. Personality characteristics of self-employed; An empirical study. Small Business Economics, 24: 159–167.

  10. Blanchflower, D.G. 2004. Self-employment: More may not be better. Working Paper 10286. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  11. Blanchflower, D.G. & Meyer, B.D. 1994. A longitudinal analysis of the young self-employed in Australia and the United States. Small Business Economics, 6: 1–19.

  12. Blanchflower, D.G. & Oswald, A.J. 1998. What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1): 26–60.

  13. Blanchflower, D.G., Oswald, A. & Stutzer, A. 2001. Latent entrepreneurship across nations. European Economic Review, 45: 680–691.

  14. Blau, D. 1987. A time-series analysis of self-employment in the US. Journal of Political Economy, 95: 445– 467.

  15. Bull, I. & Willard, G.E. 1993. Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 183–195.

  16. Carree, M., Stel, A., van, Thurik, A.R. & Wennekers, S. 2002. Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics, 19(3): 271–290.

  17. Carree, M.A. & Thurik, A.R. 2003. The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In D.B. Audretsch & Z.J. Acs (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: 437–471. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  18. Carree, M.A. & Thurik, A.R. 2006. The handbook of entrepreneurship and economic growth (international library of entrepreneurship). Cheltenham, UK and Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, forthcoming.

  19. Casson, M.C. 1982. The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

  20. Cooper, A.C. & Dunkelberg, W.C. 1987. Entrepreneurial research: Old questions, new answers and methodological issues. American Journal of Small Business, 1: 11–23.

  21. Cressy, R. 1999. The Evans and Jovanovic equivalence theorem and credit rationing: Another look. Small Business Economics, 12: 295–297.

  22. Davidsson, P. 2004. Researching entrepreneurship. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Boston etc: Springer Science Inc.

  23. Davidsson, P. & Honig, B. 2003. The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 301–331.

  24. Delmar, F. & Davidsson, P. 2000. Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12: 1–23.

  25. Douglas, E.J. & Shepherd, D.A. 2002. Self-employment as a career choice: Attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3): 81–90.

  26. Evans, D.S. & Jovanovic, B. 1989. An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97: 808–827.

  27. Evans, D.S. & Leighton, L.S. 1989. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79: 519–535.

  28. Evans, D.S. & Leighton, L.S. 1990. Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Business Economics, 2: 319–330.

  29. Grilo, I. & Irigoyen, J.M. 2005. Entrepreneurship in the EU: To wish and not to be. Small Business Economics, forthcoming.

  30. Grilo, I. & Thurik, A.R. 2004. Entrepreneurship in Europe. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy no 30–2004. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.

  31. Grilo, I. & Thurik, A.R. 2005. Entrepreneurship in the old and the new Europe. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.

  32. Hébert, R.F. & Link, A.N. 1989. In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1: 39–49.

  33. Kirchhoff, B.A. 1994. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.

  34. Kirzner, I.M. 1999. Creativity and/or alertness: A reconsideration of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. Review of Austrian Economics, 11: 5–17.

  35. Kouriloff, M. 2000. Exploring perceptions of a priori barriers to entrepreneurship: A multidisciplinary approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2): 59–79.

  36. Lin, Z., Picot, G. & Compton, J. 2000. The entry and exit dynamics of self-employment in Canada. Small Business Economics, 15: 105–125.

  37. Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21: 135–172.

  38. Minniti, M., Arenius, P. & Langowitz, N. 2005. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2004 report on women and entrepreneurship. Centre for Women's Leadership at Babson College/London Business School.

  39. OECD. 1998. Fostering entrepreneurship, the OECD jobs strategy. Paris: OECD.

  40. OECD. 2000. OECD Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.

  41. Praag, M.C. van. 1999. Some classic views on entrepreneurship. De Economist, 147: 311–335.

  42. Rees, H. & Shah, A. 1986. An empirical analysis of self-employment in the UK. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1: 95–108.

  43. Reynolds, P.D. 1997. Who starts new firms?—Preliminary explorations of firms-in-gestation. Small Business Economics, 9: 449–462.

  44. Reynolds, P.D., Hay, M. & Camp, S.M. 1999. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 1999 executive report. Babson College, London Business School and the Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

  45. Reynolds, P.D., Bygrave, W.D., Autio, E., Cox, L.W. & Hay, M. 2002. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2002 executive report, Babson College, London Business School and Kauffman Foundation.

  46. Robinson, P.B. & Sexton, E.A. 1994. The effect of education and experience on self-employment success. Journal of Business Venturing, 9: 141–156.

  47. Stel, A.J. van & Stunnenberg, V. 2004. Linking business ownership and perceived administrative complexity: An empirical analysis of 18 OECD countries. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy no 35–2004. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.

  48. Stel, A. van. 2005. COMPENDIA: Harmonizing business ownership data across countries and over time. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1: 105–123.

  49. Stel, A. van, Storey, D., Thurik, A.R. & Wennekers, S. 2005. From nascent to actual entrepreneurship: The effect of entry barriers. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany, forthcoming.

  50. Storey, D.J. 1994. Understanding the small business sector. London/New York: Routledge.

  51. Storey, D.J. 2003. Entrepreneurship, small and medium sized enterprises and public policies. In D.B. Audretsch and Z.J. Acs (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: 476–511. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  52. Uhlaner, L. & Thurik, A.R. 2004. Post-materialism: A cultural factor influencing total entrepreneurial activity across nations. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy no 07–2004. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.

  53. Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D. & Thurik, A.R. 2002. An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: Policies, institutions and culture. In D.B. Audretsch, A.R. Thurik, I. Verheul, and A.R.M. Wennekers (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a european-US comparison: 11–81. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  54. Verheul, I., Uhlaner, L. & Thurik, A.R. 2005. Business accomplishments, gender and entrepreneurial self-image. Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 483–518.

  55. Verheul, I., Stel, A. van. & Thurik, A.R. 2006. Explaining female and male entrepreneurship across 29 countries. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, forthcoming.

  56. Wagner, J. 2003. Testing lazear's jack-of-all-trades view of entrepreneurship with German micro data. Applied Economics Letters, 10: 687–689.

  57. Wennekers, A.R.M. & Thurik, A.R. 1999. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13: 27–55.

  58. Wennekers, A.R.M., Uhlaner, L. & Thurik, A.R. 2002. Entrepreneurship and its conditions: A macro perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1): 25–64.

  59. Wit, G. de & Winden, F.A.A.M. van. 1989. An empirical analysis of self-employment in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 1: 263–272.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Roy Thurik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grilo, I., Thurik, R. Latent and Actual Entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some Recent Developments. Entrepreneurship Mgt. 1, 441–459 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-4772-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • latent entrepreneurship
  • determinants of entrepreneurship
  • Europe