Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Balance control interferes with the tracing performance of a pattern with mirror-reversed vision in older persons

Abstract

When tracing a template with mirror-reversed vision (or distorted vision), the sensory information arising from the movement does not match the expected sensory consequences. In such situations, participants have to learn a new visuomotor mapping in order to trace the template with an accuracy and speed approaching that observed when tracing with direct vision. There are several suggestions that such visuomotor learning requires lowering the gain of the proprioceptive inputs. Generally, subjects learn this task in a seated condition offering a stable postural platform. Adapting to the new visuomotor relationship in a standing condition could add complexity and even hinder sensorimotor adaptation because balance control and processing of additional information typically interfere with each other. To examine this possibility, older individuals and young adults (on average, 70 and 22 years of age, respectively) were assigned to groups that trained to trace a shape with mirror-reversed vision in a seated or a standing condition for two sessions. For a third session, the seated groups (young and elderly) transferred to the standing condition while the standing groups continued to perform the tracing task while standing. This procedure allowed comparing the tracing performance of all groups (with the same amount of practice) in a standing condition. The standing groups also did a fourth session in a seated condition. Results show that older participants initially exposed to the standing condition were much slower to trace the template than all other groups (including the older group that performed the tracing task while seated). This slowness did not result from a baseline general slowness but from a genuine interference between balance control and the visuomotor conflict resulting from tracing the pattern with mirror-reversed vision. Besides, the Standing-Old participants that transferred to a seated condition in the fourth session immediately improved their tracing by reducing the total displacement covered by the pen to trace the template. Interestingly, the results did not support a transfer-appropriate practice hypothesis which suggests that training in a standing condition (at the third session) should have benefited the performance of those individuals who initially learned to trace the mirror pattern in a standing condition. This has important clinical implications: training at adapting to new sensory contexts or environmental conditions in conditions that do not challenge balance control could be necessary if one desires to attenuate the detrimental consequences on the postural or motor performances brought up by the interference between maintaining balance and the sensory reweighing processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Andersen BB, Gundersen HJG, Pakkenberg B (2003) Aging of the human cerebellum: a stereological study. J Comp Neurol 466:356–365

  2. Anguera JA, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Willingham DT, Seidler RD (2010) Failure to engage spatial working memory contributes to age-related declines in visuomotor learning. J Cogn Neurosci 23(1):11–25

  3. Balslev D, Christensen LOD, Lee J-H, Law I, Paulson OB, Miall RC (2004) Enhanced accuracy in novel mirror drawing after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced proprioceptive deafferentation. J Neurosci 24:9698–9702

  4. Bernard JA, Seidler RD (2013) Cerebellar contributions to visuomotor adaptation and motor sequence learning: an ALE meta-analysis. Front Hum Neurosci 7:27

  5. Bernier P-M, Burle B, Vidal F, Hasbroucq T, Blouin J (2009) Direct evidence for cortical suppression of somatosensory afferents during visuomotor adaptation. Cereb Cortex 19:2106–2113

  6. Boisgontier MP, Beets IAM, Duysens J et al (2013) Age-related differences in attentional cost associated with postural dual tasks: increased recruitment of generic cognitive resources in older adults. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:1824–1837

  7. Brauer SG, Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A (2001) The interacting effects of cognitive demand and recovery of postural stability in balance-impaired elderly persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M489–M496

  8. Brosseau J, Potvin MJ, Rouleau I (2007) Aging affects motor skill learning when the task requires inhibitory control. Dev Neuropsychol 32(1):597–613

  9. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

  10. Duarte M, Zatsiorsky VM (2002) Effects of body lean and visual information on the equilibrium maintenance during stance. Exp Brain Res 146:60–69

  11. Forget R, Lamarre Y (1995) Postural adjustment associated with different unloading of the forearm: effect of proprioception and cutaneous afferent deprivation. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:285–294

  12. Geurts ACH, Nienhuis B, Mulder TW (1993) Intrasubject variability of selected force-platform parameters in the quantification of postural control. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:1144–1150

  13. Hua SE, Houk JC (1997) Cerebellar guidance of premotor network development and sensorimotor learning. Learn Mem 4:63–76

  14. Imamizu H, Kuroda T, Miyauchi S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2003) Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(9):5461–5466

  15. Jeka JJ, Lackner JR (1994) Fingertip contact influences human postural control. Exp Brain Res 100:495–502

  16. Jeka J, Allison L, Saffer M, Zhang Y, Carver S, Kiemel T (2006) Sensory reweighting with translational visual stimuli in young and elderly adults: the role of state-dependent noise. Exp Brain Res 174:517–527

  17. Jeka JJ, Allison LK, Kiemel T (2010) The dynamics of visual reweighting in healthy and fall-prone older adults. J Mot Behav 42:197–208

  18. Kennedy KM, Partridge T, Raz N (2008) Age-related differences in acquisition of perceptual–motor skills: working memory as a mediator. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 15(2):165–183

  19. Lajoie Y, Paillard J, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M, Forget R, Lamarre Y (1992) Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects: visuo-proprioceptive conflict. Neurology 42:1104–1106

  20. Lee TD (1988) Transfer-appropriate processing: a framework for conceptualizing practice effects in motor learning. In: Meijer OG, Roth K (eds) Advances in psychology. Complex movement behaviour: the motor-action controversy. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 201–215

  21. Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y (1997) “Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in elderly people. Lancet 349(9052):617

  22. Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK (1994) A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol 49:M72–M84

  23. Mallau S, Simoneau M (2009) Aging reduces the ability to change grip force and balance control simultaneously. Neurosci Lett 452:23–27

  24. Maylor EA, Allison S, Wing AM (2001) Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability. Br J Psychol 92:319–338

  25. Miall RC, Cole J (2007) Evidence for stronger visuomotor than visuo-proprioceptive conflict during mirror drawing performed by a deafferented subject and control subjects. Exp Brain Res 176:432–439

  26. Morton SM, Bastian AJ (2004) Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. Neuroscientist 10:247–259

  27. Ogata K, Okamoto T, Yamasaki T, Shigeto H, Tobimatsu S (2009) Pre-movement gating of somatosensory-evoked potentials by self-initiated movements: the effects of ageing and its implication. Clin Neurophysiol 120:1143–1148

  28. Redfern MS, Jennings JR, Martin C, Furman JM (2001) Attention influences sensory integration for postural control in older adults. Gait Posture 14:211–216

  29. Richer F, Chouinard MJ, Rouleau I (1999) Frontal lesions impair the attentional control of movements during motor learning. Neuropsychologia 37(12):1427–1435

  30. Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Raz N (2005) Aging and longitudinal change in perceptual–motor skill acquisition in healthy adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 60:P174–P181

  31. Rushton DN, Rothwell JC, Craggs MD (1981) Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man. Brain 104:465–491

  32. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB (1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull 95:355–386

  33. Schmidt R, Bjork R (1992) New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychol Sci 3:207–217

  34. Stoodley CJ, Valera EM, Schmahmann JD (2012) Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 59:1560–1570

  35. Tapia MC, Cohen LG, Starr A (1987) Selectivity of attenuation (i.e. gating) of somatosensory potentials during voluntary movement in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 68:226–230

  36. Teasdale N, Simoneau M (2001) Attentional demands for postural control: the effects of aging and sensory reintegration. Gait Posture 14:203–210

  37. Teasdale N, Stelmach GE, Breunig A, Meeuwsen H (1991) Age differences in visual sensory integration. Exp Brain Res 85:691–696

  38. Teasdale N, Bard C, Larue J, Fleury M (1993) On the cognitive penetrability of posture control. Exp Aging Res 19:1–13

  39. Touge T, Takeuchi H, Sasaki I, Deguchi K, Ichihara N (1997) Enhanced amplitude reduction of somatosensory evoked potentials by voluntary movement in the elderly. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 104:108–114

  40. Ward NS, Frackowiak RSJ (2003) Age-related changes in the neural correlates of motor performance. Brain 126:873–888

  41. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A (2002) Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 16:1–14

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the subjects for their participation in this study which was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada discovery grants (NT, MS). Special thanks to Pénélope Paradis-Deschênes for her help in testing participants.

Author contributions

NT, MS, JFT and JB participated in the conception, design of the study. LGL, JFT, MB and NT conducted the study. All the authors participated to the interpretation of the data. The original draft was prepared by NT but all authors critically revised the manuscript before approving the final version.

Author information

Correspondence to Normand Teasdale.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table 2

(DOC 47 kb)

Table 3

(DOC 48 kb)

Table 4

(DOC 38 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Lemieux, L.G., Simoneau, M., Tessier, J. et al. Balance control interferes with the tracing performance of a pattern with mirror-reversed vision in older persons. AGE 36, 823–837 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-013-9601-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Balance control
  • Mirror tracing
  • Sensory gating
  • Visuomotor conflict
  • Ageing