Advertisement

AGE

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 2377–2388 | Cite as

Association between ultrasound measurements of muscle thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity and skeletal muscle strength in the elderly

  • Eva Maria StrasserEmail author
  • Thomas Draskovits
  • Markus Praschak
  • Michael Quittan
  • Alexandra Graf
Article

Abstract

The increase of elderly in our society requires simple tools for quantification of sarcopenia in inpatient and outpatient settings. The aim of this study was to compare parameters determined with musculoskeletal ultrasound (M-US) with muscle strength in young and elderly patients. In this prospective, randomised and observer blind study, 26 young (24.2 ± 3.7 years) and 26 old (age 67.8 ± 4.8 years) patients were included. Muscle thickness, pennation angle and echogenicity of all muscles of musculus quadriceps were measured by M-US and correlated with isometric maximum voluntary contraction force (MVC) of musculus quadriceps. Reproducibility of M-US measurements as well as simple and multiple regression models were calculated. Of all measured M-US variables the highest reproducibility was found for measurements of thickness (intraclass correlation coefficients, 85–97 %). Simple regression analysis showed a highly significant correlation of thickness measurements of all muscles of musculus quadriceps with MVC in the elderly and in the young. Multiple regression analysis revealed that thickness of musculus vastus medialis had the best correlation with MVC in the elderly. This study showed that measurement of muscle thickness, especially of musculus vastus medialis, by M-US is a reliable, bedside method for monitoring the extent of sarcopenia.

Keywords

Musculoskeletal ultrasound Muscle thickness Pennation angle Echogenicity Skeletal muscle strength Sarcopenia 

Abbreviations

M-US

Musculoskeletal ultrasound

MVC

Maximum isometric voluntary contraction force

ICC

Intra-class correlation coefficient

CSA

Cross-sectional area

BMI

Body mass index

References

  1. Abe T, Kawakami Y, Suzuki Y, Gunji A, Fukunaga T (1997) Effects of 20 days bed rest on muscle morphology. J Gravit Physiol 4:S10–S14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arts IM, Pillen S, Schelhaas HJ, Overeem S, Zwarts MJ (2010) Normal values for quantitative muscle ultrasonography in adults. Muscle Nerve 41:32–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Zhou S (2006) Intra- and intermuscular variation in human quadriceps femoris architecture assessed in vivo. J Anat 209:289–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Conceição M, Radaelli R, Pinto RS, Baroni BM, Vaz MA, Alberton CL, Pinto SS, Cunha G, Bottaro M, Kruel LF (2012a) Echo intensity is associated with skeletal muscle power and cardiovascular performance in elderly men. Exp Gerontol 47:473–478. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.04.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Pinto SS, Alberton CL, Pinto RS, Baroni BM, Vaz MA, Lanferdini FJ, Radaelli R, González-Izal M, Bottaro M, Kruel LF (2012b) Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent training in the elderly: effects of intrasession exercise sequence. Age (Dordr). doi: 10.1007/s11357-012-9405-y
  6. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinková E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M; European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 39:412–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R, Mortality Review Group, FALCon and HALCyon Study Teams (2010) Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 341:c4467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4467 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doherty TJ (2003) Aging and sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 95:1717–1727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Freilich RJ, Kirsner RL, Byrne E (1995) Isometric strength and thickness relationships in human quadriceps muscle. Neuromuscul Disord 5:415–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frontera WR, Hughes VA, Fielding RA, Fiatarone MA, Evans WJ, Roubenoff R (2000) Aging of skeletal muscle: a 12-yr longitudinal study. J Appl Physiol 88:1321–1326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukumoto Y, Ikezoe T, Yamada Y, Tsukagoshi R, Nakamura M, Mori N, Kimura M, Ichihashi N (2012) Skeletal muscle quality assessed from echo intensity is associated with muscle strength of middle-aged and elderly persons. Eur J Appl Physiol 112:1519–1525. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2099-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fukunaga T, Miyatani M, Tachi M, Kouzaki M, Kawakami Y, Kanehisa H (2001) Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 172:249–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gruther W, Benesch T, Zorn C, Paternostro-Sluga T, Quittan M, Fialka-Moser V, Spiss C, Kainberger F, Crevenna R (2008) Muscle wasting in intensive care patients: ultrasound observation of the m. quadriceps femoris muscle layer. J Rehabil Med 40:185–189. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0139 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagströmer M, Oja P, Sjöström M (2006) The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr 9:755–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Barr A, Cook D, Slutsky AS, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (2003) One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:683–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes VA, Frontera WR, Wood M, Evans WJ, Dallal GE, Roubenoff R, Fiatarone Singh MA (2001) Longitudinal muscle strength changes in older adults: influence of muscle mass, physical activity, and health. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:B209–B217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ikai M, Fukunaga T (1968) Calculation of muscle strength per unit cross-sectional area of human muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol 26:26–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ivey FM, Tracy BL, Lemmer JT, NessAiver M, Metter EJ, Fozard JL, Hurley BF (2000) Effects of strength training and detraining on muscle quality: age and gender comparisons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:B152–B157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Ross R (2000) Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol 89:81–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Karamanidis K, Arampatzis A (2006) Mechanical and morphological properties of human quadriceps femoris and triceps surae muscle-tendon unit in relation to aging and running. J Biomech 39:406–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawakami Y, Abe T, Fukunaga T (1993) Muscle-fiber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles. J Appl Physiol 74:2740–2744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Korhonen MT, Mero AA, Alén M, Sipilä S, Häkkinen K, Liikavainio T, Viitasalo JT, Haverinen MT, Suominen H (2009) Biomechanical and skeletal muscle determinants of maximum running speed with aging. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(4):844–856. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181998366 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, Bartali B, Cavazzini C, Di Iorio A, Corsi AM, Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L (2003) Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 95:1851–1860PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Manini TM, Clark BC, Nalls MA, Goodpaster BH, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Harris TB (2007) Reduced physical activity increases intermuscular adipose tissue in healthy young adults. Am J Clin Nutr 85:377–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J (1983a) Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 338:37–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J (1983b) Relationships between muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area in male sprinters and endurance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 50:309–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maurits NM, Bollen AE, Windhausen A, De Jager AE, Van Der Hoeven JH (2003) Muscle ultrasound analysis: normal values and differentiation between myopathies and neuropathies. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:215–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miyatani M, Kanehisa H, Kuno S, Nishijima T, Fukunaga T (2002) Validity of ultrasonograph muscle thickness measurements for estimating muscle volume of knee extensors in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 86:203–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morse CI, Thom JM, Reeves ND, Birch KM, Narici MV (2005) In vivo physiological cross-sectional area and specific force are reduced in the gastrocnemius of elderly men. J Appl Physiol 99:1050–1055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Narici MV, Roi GS, Landoni L, Minetti AE, Cerretelli P (1989) Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 59:310–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Oberg B (2001) Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehabil Med 33:36–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pillen S, van Keimpema M, Nievelstein RA, Verrips A, van Kruijsbergen-Raijmann W, Zwarts MJ (2006) Skeletal muscle ultrasonography: visual versus quantitative evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:1315–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pillen S, Tak RO, Zwarts MJ, Lammens MM, Verrijp KN, Arts IM, van der Laak JA, Hoogerbrugge PM, van Engelen BG, Verrips A (2009) Skeletal muscle ultrasound: correlation between fibrous tissue and echo intensity. Ultrasound Med Biol 35:443–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Foley D, Masaki K, Leveille S, Curb JD, White L (1999) Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability. JAMA 281:558–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rantanen T, Harris T, Leveille SG, Visser M, Foley D, Masaki K, Guralnik JM (2000) Muscle strength and body mass index as long-term predictors of mortality in initially healthy men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M168–M173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reimers CD, Harder T, Saxe H (1998) Age-related muscle atrophy does not affect all muscles and can partly be compensated by physical activity: an ultrasound study. J Neurol Sci 159:60–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reimers K, Reimers CD, Wagner S, Paetzke I, Pongratz DE (1993) Skeletal muscle sonography: a correlative study of echogenicity and morphology. J Ultrasound Med 12:73–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rutherford OM, Jones DA (1992) Measurement of fibre pennation using ultrasound in the human quadriceps in vivo. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 65:433–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seymour JM, Ward K, Sidhu PS, Puthucheary Z, Steier J, Jolley CJ, Rafferty G, Polkey MI, Moxham J (2009) Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area and the relationship with quadriceps strength in COPD. Thorax 64:418–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sipilä S, Suominen H (1996) Quantitative ultrasonography of muscle: detection of adaptations to training in elderly women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:1173–1178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taekema DG, Gussekloo J, Maier AB, Westendorp RG, de Craen AJ (2010) Handgrip strength as a predictor of functional, psychological and social health. A prospective population-based study among the oldest old. Age Ageing 39:331–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thoirs K, English C (2009) Ultrasound measures of muscle thickness: intra-examiner reliability and influence of body position. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 29:440–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Young A, Stokes M, Crowe M (1985) The size and strength of the quadriceps muscles of old and young men. Clin Physiol 5:145–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Aging Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Maria Strasser
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Thomas Draskovits
    • 1
    • 2
  • Markus Praschak
    • 2
  • Michael Quittan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexandra Graf
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Social Medical Centre SouthKaiser Franz Joseph HospitalViennaAustria
  2. 2.Karl Landsteiner Institute of Remobilisation and Functional Health, Social Medical Centre SouthKaiser Franz Joseph HospitalViennaAustria
  3. 3.Institute of Medical StatisticsMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations