AGE

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 2357–2366 | Cite as

Redefining meaningful age groups in the context of disease

Article

Abstract

Age is an important factor when considering phenotypic changes in health and disease. Currently, the use of age information in medicine is somewhat simplistic, with ages commonly being grouped into a small number of crude ranges reflecting the major stages of development and aging, such as childhood or adolescence. Here, we investigate the possibility of redefining age groups using the recently developed Age-Phenome Knowledge-base (APK) that holds over 35,000 literature-derived entries describing relationships between age and phenotype. Clustering of APK data suggests 13 new, partially overlapping, age groups. The diseases that define these groups suggest that the proposed divisions are biologically meaningful. We further show that the number of different age ranges that should be considered depends on the type of disease being evaluated. This finding was further strengthened by similar results obtained from clinical blood measurement data. The grouping of diseases that share a similar pattern of disease-related reports directly mirrors, in some cases, medical knowledge of disease–age relationships. In other cases, our results may be used to generate new and reasonable hypotheses regarding links between diseases.

Keywords

Age Age groups Clustering Disease 

References

  1. Ben-Dor A, Shamir R, Yakhini Z (1999) Clustering gene expression patterns. J Comput Biol 6(3–4):281–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3:993–1022Google Scholar
  3. Carol K, Sigelman EAR (2005) Life-span human development. 6. Wadsworth Publishing, 3–4Google Scholar
  4. Chandra RK (1984) Parasitic infection, nutrition, and immune response. Fed Proc 43(2):251–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cnattingius S, Hultman CM, Dahl M, Sparen P (1999) Very preterm birth, birth trauma, and the risk of anorexia nervosa among girls. Arch Gen Psychiatry 56(7):634–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeLamater J, Friedrich WN (2002) Human sexual development. J Sex Res 39(1):10–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diamond SG, Markham CH, Hoehn MM, McDowell FH, Muenter MD (1989) Effect of age at onset on progression and mortality in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 39(9):1187–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunson DB, Baird DD, Colombo B (2004) Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstet Gynecol 103(1):51–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ekeus C, Lindberg L, Lindblad F, Hjern A (2006) Birth outcomes and pregnancy complications in women with a history of anorexia nervosa. Bjog 113(8):925–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fliss A, Ragolsky M, Rubin E (2008) Reverse translational bioinformatics: a bioinformatics assay of age, gender and clinical biomarkers. AMIA summit on translation bioinformatics San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  11. Foxman B, Barlow R, D’Arcy H, Gillespie B, Sobel JD (2000) Candida vaginitis: self-reported incidence and associated costs. Sex Transm Dis 27(4):230–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geifman N, Rubin E (2011) Towards an age-phenome knowledge-base. BMC Bioinforma 12:229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geifman N, Rubin E (2012) The age-phenome database. SpringerPlus 1(4)Google Scholar
  14. Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NO, Castellanos FX, Liu H, Zijdenbos A, Paus T, Evans AC, Rapoport JL (1999) Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nat Neurosci 2(10):861–863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) A K-means clustering algorithm. Appl Stat 28:100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hasenclever D, Diehl V (1998) A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin’s disease. International prognostic factors project on advanced hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 339(21):1506–1514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ho JH (1978) An epidemiologic and clinical study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 4(3–4):182–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson SC (1967) Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32(3):241–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit [http://mallet.cs.umass.edu]
  20. Mueller N (1991) The epidemiology of HTLV-I infection. Cancer Causes Control 2(1):37–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Samartín S, Chandra RK (2001) Obesity, overnutrition and the immune system. Nutr Res 21(1–2):243–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharan R, Maron-Katz A, Shamir R (2003) CLICK and EXPANDER: a system for clustering and visualizing gene expression data. Bioinformatics 19(14):1787–1799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sherlock G (2001) Analysis of large-scale gene expression data. Brief Bioinform 2(4):350–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Su JM, Li Y, Ye XW, Wu ZF (2007) Oral findings of hypophosphatemic vitamin D-resistant rickets: report of two cases. Chin Med J (Engl) 120(16):1468–1470Google Scholar
  25. Suzuki R, Shimodaira H (2006) Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 22(12):1540–1542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Syrjanen K, Vayrynen M, Castren O, Yliskoski M, Mantyjarvi R, Pyrhonen S, Saarikoski S (1984) Sexual behaviour of women with human papillomavirus (HPV) lesions of the uterine cervix. Br J Vener Dis 60(4):243–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vecht CJ (1993) Effect of age on treatment decisions in low-grade glioma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 56(12):1259–1264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wallach HM, McCallum DMA (2009) Rethinking LDA: Why Priors Matter. NIPSGoogle Scholar
  29. Weinstock H, Berman S, Cates W Jr (2004) Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 36(1):6–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yin L, Huang CH, Ni J (2006) Clustering of gene expression data: performance and similarity analysis. BMC Bioinforma 7(Suppl 4):S19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Aging Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute for Biotechnology in the NegevBen Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael
  2. 2.Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyBen Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Computer SciencesBen Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations