AGE

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 1339–1355

Ageing of internal models: from a continuous to an intermittent proprioceptive control of movement

Article
  • 315 Downloads

Abstract

To control the sensory–motor system, internal models mimic the transformations between motor commands and sensory signals. The present study proposed to assess the effects of physiological adult ageing on the proprioceptive control of movement and the related internal models. To this aim, one group of young adults and one group of older adults performed an ankle contralateral concurrent matching task in two speed conditions (self-selected and fast). Error, temporal and kinematic variables were used to assess the matching performance. The results demonstrated that older adults used a different mode of control as compared to the young adults and suggested that the internal models of proprioceptive control were altered with ageing. Behavioural expressions of these alterations were dependent upon the considered condition of speed. In the self-selected speed condition, this alteration was expressed through an increased number of corrective sub-movements in older adults as compared to their young peers. This strategy enabled them to reach a level of end-point performance comparable to the young adults' performance. In the fast speed condition, older adults were no more able to compensate for their impaired internal models through additional corrective sub-movements and therefore decreased their proprioceptive control performance. These results provided the basis for a model of proprioceptive control of movement integrating the internal models theory and the continuous and intermittent modes of control. This study also suggested that motor control was affected by the frailty syndrome, i.e. a decreased resistance to stressors, which characterises older adults.

Keywords

Motor control Internal models Proprioception Frailty Physiological ageing 

References

  1. Adamo DE, Alexander NB, Brown SH (2009) The influence of age and physical activity on upper limb proprioceptive ability. J Aging Phys Act 17:272–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamo DE, Martin BJ, Brown SH (2007) Age-related differences in upper limb proprioceptive acuity. Percept Mot Skills 104:1297–1309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Asai Y, Tasaka Y, Nomura K, Nomura T, Casadio M, Morasso P (2009) A model of postural control in quiet standing: robust compensation of delay-induced instability using intermittent activation of feedback control. PLoS One 4:e6169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkeson CG (1989) Learning arm kinematics and dynamics. Annu Rev Neurosci 12:157–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbieri G, Gissot AS, Perennou D (2010) Ageing of the postural vertical. Age 32:51–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bard C, Turrell Y, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Lamarre Y, Martin O (1999) Deafferentation and pointing with visual double-step perturbations. Exp Brain Res 125:410–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batavia M, Gianutsos JG, Ling W, Nelson AJ (1999) The effects of circumferential wrist pressure on reproduction accuracy of wrist placement in healthy young and elderly adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 54:M177–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock O (2005) Components of sensorimotor adaptation in young and elderly subjects. Exp Brain Res 160:259–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boisgontier MP, Olivier I, Chenu O, Nougier V (2012) Presbypropria: the effects of physiological ageing on proprioceptive control. Age. doi:10.1007/s11357-011-9300-y
  10. Bolton CF, Winkelmann RK, Dyck PJ (1966) A quantitative study of Meissner's corpuscles in man. Neurology 16:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Branch Coslett H, Buxbaum LJ, Schwoebel J (2008) Accurate reaching after active but not passive movements of the hand: evidence for forward modeling. Behav Neurol 19:117–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Buch ER, Young S, Contreras-Vidal JL (2003) Visuomotor adaptation in normal aging. Learn Mem 10:55–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins JJ, De Luca CJ, Burrows A, Lipsitz LA (1995) Age-related changes in open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms. Exp Brain Res 104:480–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooke JD, Brown SH, Cunningham DA (1989) Kinematics of arm movements in elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging 10:159–165Google Scholar
  15. Cooke JD, Diggles VA (1984) Rapid error correction during human arm movements: evidence for central monitoring. J Mot Behav 16:348–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Darling WG, Cooke JD, Brown SH (1989) Control of simple arm movements in elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging 10:149–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dean P, Porrill J, Ekerot CF, Jörntell H (2010) The cerebellar microcircuit as an adaptive filter: experimental and computational evidence. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:30–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Der G, Deary IJ (2006) Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychol Aging 21:62–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deshpande N, Connelly DM, Culham EG, Costigan PA (2003) Reliability and validity of ankle proprioceptive measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:883–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2:563–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eikema DJ, Hatzitaki V, Tzovaras D, Papaxanthis C (2012) Age-dependent modulation of sensory reweighting for controlling posture in a dynamic virtual environment. Age. doi:101007/s11357-011-9310-9
  22. Elliott D (1988) The influence of visual target and limb information on manual aiming. Can J Psychol 42:57–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elliott D, Carson RG, Goodman D, Chua R (1991) Discrete vs continuous visual control of manual aiming. Hum Mov Sci 10:393–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliott D, Hansen S (2010) Visual regulation of manual aiming: a comparison of methods. Behav Res Methods 42:1087–1095PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elliott D, Madalena J (1987) The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Q J Exp Psychol A 39:541–559PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Enoka RM, Christou EA, Hunter SK, Kornatz KW, Semmler JG, Taylor AM, Tracy BL (2003) Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Erim Z, Beg MF, Burke DT, de Luca CJ (1999) Effects of aging on motor-unit control properties. J Neurophysiol 82:2081–2091PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Farrer C, Franck N, Paillard J, Jeannerod M (2003) The role of proprioception in action recognition. Conscious Cogn 12:609–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1997) The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. J Neurosci 17:1519–1528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M146–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gawthrop P, Loram I, Lakie M, Gollee H (2011) Intermittent control: a computational theory of human control. Biol Cybern 104:31–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gazzaley A, Cooney JW, Rissman J, D'Esposito M (2005) Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nat Neurosci 8:1298–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ghafouri M, Lestienne FG (2000) Altered representation of peripersonal space in the elderly human subject: a sensorimotor approach. Neurosci Lett 289:193–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goble DJ, Brown SH (2007) Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement. Exp Brain Res 180:693–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, De Vos J, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2010a) The neural control of bimanual movements in the elderly: brain regions exhibiting age-related increases in activity, frequency-induced neural modulation, and task-specific compensatory recruitment. Hum Brain Mapp 31:1281–1295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, Geurts M, Doumas M, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2011) Brain activity during ankle proprioceptive stimulation predicts balance performance in young and older adults. J Neurosci 31:16344–16352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, Geurts M, Van Hecke W, Sunaert S, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2012a) The neural basis of central proprioceptive processing in older versus younger adults: an important sensory role for right putamen. Hum Brain Mapp 33:895–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goble DJ, Mousigian MA, Brown SH (2012b) Compromised encoding of proprioceptively determined joint angles in older adults: the role of working memory and attentional load. Exp Brain Res 216:35–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goble DJ, Noble BC, Brown SH (2010b) Where was my arm again? Memory-based matching of proprioceptive targets is enhanced by increased target presentation time. Neurosci Lett 481:54–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goggin NL, Meeuwsen HJ (1992) Age-related differences in the control of spatial aiming movements. Res Q Exerc Sport 63:366–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goggin NL, Stelmach GE (1990) Age-related differences in a kinematic analysis of precued movements. Can J Aging 9:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hanneton S, Berthoz A, Droulez J, Slotine JJE (1997) Does the brain use sliding variables for the control of movements? Biol Cybern 77:381–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hansen S, Elliott D (2009) Three-dimensional manual responses to unexpected target perturbations during rapid aiming. J Mot Behav 41:16–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hegele M, Heuer H (2010) Adaptation to a direction-dependent visuomotor gain in the young and elderly. Psychol Res 74:21–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heuninckx S, Debaere F, Wenderoth N, Verschueren S, Swinnen SP (2004) Ipsilateral coordination deficits and central processing requirements associated with coordination as a function of aging. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 59:P225–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heuninckx S, Wenderoth N, Debaere F, Peeters R, Swinnen SP (2005) Neural basis of aging: the penetration of cognition into action control. J Neurosci 25:6787–6796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Heuninckx S, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2008) Systems neuroplasticity in the aging brain: recruiting additional neural resources for successful motor performance in elderly persons. J Neurosci 28:91–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hutchinson S, Kobayashi M, Horkan CM, Pascual-Leone A, Alexander MP, Schlaug G (2002) Age-related differences in movement representation. Neuroimage 17:1720–1728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14:S103–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jordan MI, Rumelhart DE (1992) Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cogn Sci 16:307–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kararizou E, Manta P, Kalfakis N, Vassilopoulos D (2005) Morphometric study of the human muscle spindle. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 27:1–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kawato M (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:718–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kawato M, Furukawa K, Suzuki R (1987) A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement. Biol Cybern 57:169–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Keele SW (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psych Bull 70:387–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ketcham CJ, Seidler RD, Van Gemmert AW, Stelmach GE (2002) Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 57:P54–P64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kleinman D (1969) Optimal control of linear systems with time-delay and observation noise. IEEE Trans Autom Control 14:524–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lepelley MC, Thullier F, Bolmont B, Lestienne FG (2010) Age-related differences in sensorimotor representation of space in drawing by hand. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1890–1897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Levin HS, Benton AL (1973) Age effects in proprioceptive feedback performance. Gerontol Clin 15:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Li SC, Sikstrom S (2002) Integrative neurocomputational perspectives on cognitive aging, neuromodulation, and representation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:795–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Liu JX, Eriksson PO, Thornell LE, Pedrosa-Domellöf F (2005) Fiber content and myosin heavy chain composition of muscle spindles in aged human biceps brachii. J Histochem Cytochem 53:445–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Loram ID, Gollee H, Lakie M, Gawthrop PJ (2011) Human control of an inverted pendulum: is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological? J Physiol 589:307–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lyons J, Elliott D, Swanson LR, Chua R (1996) The use of vision and manual aiming by young and older adults. J Aging Phys Act 4:165–178Google Scholar
  64. Marks R (1996) Further evidence of impaired position sense in knee osteoarthritis. Physiother Res Int 1:127–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Marshall J (1961) The effect of ageing upon physiological tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 24:14–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mattay VS, Fera F, Tessitore A, Hariri AR, Das S, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR (2002) Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in human motor function. Neurology 58:630–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Meeuwsen HJ, Sawicki TM, Stelmach GE (1993) Improved foot position sense as a result of repetitions in older adults. J Gerontol 48:P137–P141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Messier J, Kalaska JF (1999) Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 125:139–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Miall RC, King D (2008) State estimation in the cerebellum. Cerebellum 7:572–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Miall RC, Weir DJ, Stein JF (1993) Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. J Mot Behav 25:53–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Miall RC, Wolpert DM (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9:1265–1279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Miwa T, Miwa Y, Kanda K (1995) Dynamic and static sensitivities of muscle spindle primary endings in aged rats to ramp stretch. Neurosci Lett 201:179–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Morisawa Y (1998) Morphological study of mechanoreceptors on the coracoacromial ligament. J Orthop Sci 3:102–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Murrell KFH, Entwisle DG (1960) Age differences in movement pattern. Nature 185:948–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Naccarato M, Calautti C, Jones PS, Day DJ, Carpenter TA, Baron JC (2006) Does healthy aging affect the hemispheric activation balance during paced index-to-thumb opposition task? An fMRI study. Neuroimage 32:1250–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Personnier P, Ballay Y, Papaxanthis C (2010) Mentally represented motor actions in normal aging: III. Electromyographic features of imagined arm movements. Behav Brain Res 206:184–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Personnier P, Kubicki A, Laroche D, Papaxanthis C (2008) Temporal features of imagined locomotion in normal aging. Neurosci Lett 476:146–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Peters M (1988) Footedness: asymmetries in foot preference and skill and neuropsychological assessment of foot movement. Psychol Bull 103:179–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pickard CM, Sullivan PE, Allison GT, Singer KP (2003) Is there a difference in hip joint position sense between young and older groups? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:631–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pratt J, Chasteen AL, Abrams RA (1994) Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements. Psychol Aging 9:325–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rey-Robert B, Temprado JJ, Lemaire P, Berton E (2012) Combining movement kinematics, efficiency functions, and Brinley plots to study age-related slowing of sensorimotor processes: insights from Fitts' task. Gerontology 58:171–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Salo PT, Tatton WG (1993) Age-related loss of knee joint afferents in mice. J Neurosci Res 35:664–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Saltzman E (1979) Levels of sensorimotor representation. J Math Psychol 20:97–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scarchilli K, Vercher JL (1999) The oculomanual coordination control center takes into account the mechanical properties of the arm. Exp Brain Res 124:42–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2005) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  86. Seidler RD, Alberts JL, Stelmach GE (2002) Changes in multi-joint performance with age. Motor Control 6:19–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Seidler-Dobrin RD, Stelmach GE (1998) Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly. Exp Brain Res 119:467–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Skoura X, Papaxanthis C, Vinter A, Pozzo T (2005) Mentally represented motor actions in normal aging. I. Age effects on the temporal features of overt and covert execution of actions. Behav Brain Res 165:229–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Speers RA, Kuo AD, Horak FB (2002) Contributions of altered sensation and feedback responses to changes in coordination of postural control due to aging. Gait Posture 16:20–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Swash M, Fox KP (1972) The effect of age on human skeletal muscle. Studies of the morphology and innervation of muscle spindles. J Neurol Sci 16:417–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Thaler DS (2002) Design for an aging brain. Neurobiol Aging 23:13–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. van Donkelaar P, Franks IM (1991) Preprogramming vs on-line control in simple movement sequences. Acta Psychol 77:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. van Sonderen JF, Gielen CC, Denier van der Gon JJ (1989) Motor programmes for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location. Exp Brain Res 78:139–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. von Holst E (1954) Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. Br J Anim Behav 2:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Welford AT, Norris AH, Shock NW (1969) Speed and accuracy of movement and their changes with age. Acta Psychol 30:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Welsh TN, Higgins L, Elliott D (2007) Are there age-related differences in learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure? Hum Mov Sci 26:892–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Whitney DE (1972) The mathematics of coordinated control of prosthetic arms and manipulators. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 94:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3(Suppl):1212–1217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wolpert DM, Kawato M (1998) Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 11:1317–1329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M (1998) Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 2:338–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Winter JL, Stein JF (1992) Evidence for an error deadzone in compensatory tracking. J Mot Behav 24:299–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Yan JH, Thomas JR, Stelmach GE, Thomas KT (2000) Developmental features of rapid aiming arm movements across the lifespan. J Mot Behav 32:121–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Aging Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UJF-Grenoble 1/CNRS/TIMC-IMAG, UMR 5525GrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Department of biomedical kinesiology, Research center for movement control and neuroplasticityKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations