Skip to main content
Log in

Intention to adopt bicycle-sharing in China: introducing environmental concern into the theory of planned behavior model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bicycle-sharing is regarded as a new mode of transportation with low-carbon and low-cost advantages, which could effectively alleviate traffic congestion. Understanding the factors and influence paths that affect users’ willingness to adopt bicycle-sharing is of great importance. This study aims to investigate how users’ environmental concern affects their willingness to adopt bicycle-sharing through the impacts of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavior control. The research model was constructed based on the theory of planned behavior model and validated by empirical data collected from 988 users in China utilizing structural equation modeling technique. The results show that users’ environmental concern is positively and significantly related to their attitude (β = 0.593, p < 0.001), subjective norm (β = 0.358, p < 0.001), and perceived behavior control (β = 0.508, p < 0.001) toward adopting bicycle-sharing. In turn, users’ attitude (β = 0.496, p < 0.001), subjective norm (β = 0.209, p < 0.001), and perceived behavior control (β = 0.206, p < 0.01) toward adopting bicycle-sharing all positively affect the intention to adopt bicycle-sharing. Based on these results, policy implications for improving the users’ acceptance and usage rate of bicycle-sharing and suggestions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adnan N, Nordin SM, Rahman I, Aimi MH (2017) A market modeling review study on predicting Malaysian consumer behavior towards widespread adoption of PHEV/EV. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(3 4):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2014) The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychol Rev 9(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Axsen J, Kurani KS (2013) Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric—what do car buyers want? Energy Policy 61:532–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axsen J, Kurani KS (2012) Social influence, consumer behavior, and low-carbon energy transitions. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:311–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Dholakia UM, Basuroy S (2003) How effortful decisions get enacted: the motivating role of decision processes, desires, and anticipated emotions. J Behav Decis Mak 16(4):273–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg S (2003) How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. J Environ Psychol 23(1):21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brands T, De Romph E, Veitch T, Cook J (2014) Modelling public transport route choice, with multiple access and egress modes. Transp Res Proc 1(1):12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai SJ, Long XL, Li L, Liang H, Wang QL, Ding XP (2019) Determinants of intention and behavior of low carbon commuting through bicycle-sharing in China. J Clean Prod 212:602–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreira R, Patrício L, Jorge RN, Magee C (2014) Understanding the travel experience and its impact on attitudes, emotions and loyalty towards the transportation provider–a quantitative study with mid-distance bus trips. Transp Policy 31:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castanier C, Deroche T, Woodman T (2013) Theory of planned behaviour and road violations: the moderating influence of perceived behavioural control. Transport Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav 18:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K (1998) Mass communication and pro-environmental behaviour: waste recycling in Hong Kong. J Environ Manag 52(4):317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CF, Chao WH (2011) Habitual or reasoned? Using the theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, and habit to examine switching intentions toward public transit. Transport Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav 14(2):128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SY (2016) Using the sustainable modified TAM and TPB to analyze the effects of perceived green value on loyalty to a public bike system. Transp Res A Policy Pract 88:58–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X (2017) Energy saving and emission reduction to promote the adjustment of transport structure and development mode. Energ Conserv Environ Protec Transp

  • Chiu CM, Wang ETG (2008) Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Inf Manag 45(3):194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao CH, Jin H, Zhao DT (2019) Understanding corporate surplus food donation in china: testing the roles of environmental concern, altruism, past experience, and perceived risk. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

  • Daziano RA, Bolduc D (2013) Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 9(1):74–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding XP, Long XL, Li L, Liang H, Wang QL, Cai SJ (2019) Antecedents of satisfaction and engagement of low-carbon bicycle-sharing using in china. Environ Sci Pollut Res

  • Groot JIMD, Steg L (2010) Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. J Environ Psychol 30(4):368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhomme P, Gheorghiu A (2016) Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: which factors contribute the most to carpooling? Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 42:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 4(1):7

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob T F (2003) Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp Res B Methodol 37(1):0-25, 1

  • González F, Melo-Riquelme C, Grange LD (2016) A combined destination and route choice model for a bicycle sharing system. Transportation 43(3):407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Tatham RL, Anderson RE, et al. (2010) Multivariate data analysis vol. 7: Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River

  • Hamilton TL, Wichman CJ (2018) Bicycle infrastructure and traffic congestion: evidence from DC’s Capital Bikeshare. J Environ Econ Manag 87:72–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner RR, Kurani KS, Turrentine TS (2007) Symbolism in California’s early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 12(6):396–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyunmo Kang, Minhi Hahn, David R. Fortin, Yong J. Hyun, & Yunni Eom. (2006) Effects of perceived behavioral control on the consumer usage intention of e-coupons. , 23(10), 841-864.

  • Ibrahim H, Najjar F (2008) Assessing the effects of self-congruity, attitudes and customer satisfaction on customer behavioural intentions in retail environment[J]. Mark Intell Plan 26(2):207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakovcevic A, Steg L (2013) Sustainable transportation in Argentina: values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction. Transport Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav 20:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Manca F, Nielsen TAS, Prato CG (2015) Intentions to use bike-sharing for holiday cycling: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Tour Manag 47:34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Han H (2010) Intention to pay conventional-hotel prices at a green hotel–a modification of the theory of planned behavior. J Sustain Tour 18(8):997–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutner MH, Neter J, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (2004) Applied linear statistical model. Richard D. Irwin, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee W, Xiong L, Hu C (2012) The effect of Facebook users’ arousal and valence on intention to go to the festival: applying an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int J Hosp Manag 31(3):819–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zuo J, Cai H, Zillante G (2018) Construction waste reduction behavior of contractor employees: an extended theory of planned behavior model approach. J Clean Prod 172:1399–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Ke W, Wei KK, Gu J, Chen H (2010) The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems. J Oper Manag 28(5):372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttavuthisit K, Thøgersen J (2017) The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: the case of organic food. J Bus Ethics 140(2):323–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramayah T, Lee JW, Lim S (2012) Sustaining the environment through recycling: an empirical study. J Environ Manag 102(6):141–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sang YN, Bekhet HA (2015) Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: an empirical study in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 92:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuitema G, Anable J, Skippon S, Kinnear N (2013) The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transp Res A Policy Pract 48:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M P , Chakraborty A , Roy M (2017) Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to explore circular economy readiness in manufacturing MSMEs, India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, S0921344917301945

  • Victoria S, Bentler P M (2006) Structural equation modeling. Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology

  • Wan C, Shen GQ, Yu A (2014) The moderating effect of perceived policy effectiveness on recycling intention. J Environ Psychol 37:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SY, Fan J, Zhao DT, Yang S, Fu Y (2016) Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation. 43(1):123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Zhao M, Wang F, Peng C, Zhao DT (2016) An empirical study of the Volkswagen crisis in China: customers information processing and behavioral intentions. Risk Anal 36(1):114–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HH, Yu JJ, Zo HH et al (2016) User acceptance of wearable devices: an extended perspective of perceived value[J]. Telematics Inform 33(2):256–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang K, Hao Y, Fan JL, Wei YM (2013) The impact of government policy on preference for NEVs: the evidence from China. Energy Policy 61:382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y J, Guo H W, Wang W H, et al (2015) Modeling acceptance of electric vehicle sharing based on theory of planned behavior[J]. Road Traffic Safety

Download references

Funding

The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 71804174, 71601174, 71571172, and 71701193), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant number 2018 M632555), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities for their generous financial support (WK2040150015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengzheng Lin.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Baojing Gu

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, M., Hu, X., Lin, Z. et al. Intention to adopt bicycle-sharing in China: introducing environmental concern into the theory of planned behavior model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 41740–41750 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10135-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10135-1

Keywords

Navigation