Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Integrating alum sludge with waste-activated sludge in co-conditioning and dewatering: a case study of a city in south France

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

The unique geographical location of waterworks and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Graulhet (France) profited the environmental resource integration and “Circular Economy.” Alum sludge from a local waterworks was introduced to co-conditioning and dewatering with waste-activated sludge from a nearby WWTP to examine the role of the alum sludge in improving the dewaterability of the mixed sludge. Experiments demonstrated that the optimal mixing ratio was 1:1 (waste-activated sludge/alum sludge, v/v). Alum sludge has been shown to beneficially enhance mixed sludge dewaterability, by decreasing both the specific resistance to filtration (SRF) and the capillary suction time (CST). Moreover, the optimal polymer (Sueprfloc-492HMW) dose for the mixed sludge (mix ratio 1:1) was 200 mg/L, highlighting a huge savings (14 times) in polymer addition without alum sludge involvement. In addition, cost-effective analysis of its potential full-scale application has demonstrated that the initial investment could be returned in 11 years. The co-conditioning and dewatering strategy can be viewed as a “win-win” strategy for the Graulhet, France, water and wastewater industry.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Ahmad T, Ahmad K, Alam M (2016) Sustainable management of water treatment sludge through 3‘R’ concept. J Clean Prod 124(Supplement C):1–13

  2. Basibuyuk M, Kalat DG (2004) The use of waterworks sludge for the treatment of vegetable oil refinery industry wastewater. Environ Technol 25(3):373–380

  3. Bi DS, Guo XP, Cai ZH, Yu Z, Wang DM, Wang YQ (2015) Enhanced dewaterability of waste-activated sludge by combined cationic polyacrylamide and magnetic field pretreatment. Environ Technol 36(4):455–462

  4. Chang GR, Liu JC, Lee DJ (2001) Co-conditioning and dewatering of chemical sludge and waste activated sludge. Water Res 35(3):786–794

  5. Chu W (2001) Dye removal from textile dye wastewater using recycled alum sludge. Water Res 35(13):3147–3152

  6. Foroughi M, Chavoshi S, Bagheri M, Yetilmezsoy K, Samadi MT (2018) Alum-based sludge (AbS) recycling for turbidity removal in drinking water treatment: an insight into statistical, technical, and health-related standpoints. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 20(4):1999–2017

  7. Guo J, Chen C, Jiang S, Zhou Y (2018) Feasibility and mechanism of combined conditioning with coagulant and flocculant to enhance sludge dewatering. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(8):10758–10765

  8. Gutiérrez Ortiz FJ, Aguilera PG, Ollero P (2014a) Biogas desulfurization by adsorption on thermally treated sewage-sludge. Sep Purif Technol 123:200–213

  9. Gutiérrez Ortiz FJ, Aguilera PG, Ollero P (2014b) Modeling and simulation of the adsorption of biogas hydrogen sulfide on treated sewage–sludge. Chem Eng J 253:305–315

  10. Herstein LM, Filion YR (2011) Life-cycle assessment of common water main materials in water distribution networks. J Hydroinf 13(3):346–357

  11. Lai JY, Liu JC (2004) Co-conditioning and dewatering of alum sludge and waste activated sludge. Water Sci Technol 50(9):41–48

  12. Li J, Liu L, Liu J, Ma T, Yan A, Ni Y (2016) Effect of adding alum sludge from water treatment plant on sewage sludge dewatering. J Environ Chem Eng 4(1):746–752

  13. Mazari L, Abdessemed D, Szymczyk A (2018) Evaluating reuse of alum sludge as coagulant for tertiary wastewater treatment. J Environ Eng 144(12):04018119

  14. Nair AT, Ahammed MM (2015) The reuse of water treatment sludge as a coagulant for post-treatment of UASB reactor treating urban wastewater. J Clean Prod 96:272–281

  15. Pambou YB, Fraikin L, Salmon T, Crine M, Leonard A (2016) Enhanced sludge dewatering and drying comparison of two linear polyelectrolytes co-conditioning with polyaluminum chloride. Desalin Water Treat 57(58):27989–28006

  16. Qi Y, Thapa KB, Hoadley AFA (2011a) Application of filtration aids for improving sludge dewatering properties – a review. Chem Eng J 171(2):373–384

  17. Qi Y, Thapa KB, Hoadley AFA (2011b) Benefit of lignite as a filter aid for dewatering of digested sewage sludge demonstrated in pilot scale trials. Chem Eng J 166(2):504–510

  18. Ren B, Zhao Y, Lyczko N, Nzihou A (2019) Current status and outlook of odor removal technologies in wastewater treatment plant. Waste Biomass Valoriz 10(6):1443–1458

  19. Wang Y, Ren BM, Zhao YQ, English A, Cannon M (2018) A comparison of alum sludge with peat for aqueous glyphosate removal for maximizing their value for practical use. Water Sci Technol 2017(2):450–456

  20. Wei H, Gao B, Ren J, Li A, Yang H (2018) Coagulation/flocculation in dewatering of sludge: a review. Water Res 143:608–631

  21. Xiong Q, Zhou M, Yang H, Liu M, Wang T, Dong Y, Hou H (2018) Improving the dewaterability of sewage sludge using rice husk and Fe2+-sodium persulfate oxidation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(1):872–881

  22. Yang Y, Zhao YQ, Babatunde AO, Kearney P (2007) Co-conditioning of the anaerobic digested sludge of a municipal wastewater treatment plant with alum sludge: benefit of phosphorus reduction in reject water. Water Environ Res 79(13):2468–2476

  23. Yang Y, Zhao YQ, Babatunde AO, Kearney P (2009) Two strategies for phosphorus removal from reject water of municipal wastewater treatment plant using alum sludge. Water Sci Technol 60(12):3181–3188

  24. Yang Y, Zhao YQ, Liu RB, Morgan D (2018) Global development of various emerged substrates utilized in constructed wetlands. Bioresour Technol 261:441–452

  25. Zhao Y, Liu R, Awe OW, Yang Y, Shen C (2018) Acceptability of land application of alum-based water treatment residuals – an explicit and comprehensive review. Chem Eng J 353:717–726

  26. Zhao Y, Ren B, O’Brien A, O’Toole S (2016) Using alum sludge for clay brick: an Irish investigation. Int J Environ Stud 73(5):719–730

  27. Zhu C, Zhang P, Wang H, Ye J (2018) Conditioning of sewage sludge via combined ultrasonication-flocculation-skeleton building to improve sludge dewaterability. Ultrason Sonochem 40:353–360

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author greatly acknowledges the Ph.D. scholarship received jointly from the University College Dublin, Ireland, and China Scholarship Council (CSC). The RAPSODEE Research Centre (CNRS UMR 5302), France, and the staff in Régie Municipale de l’Eaux et de l’Assainissement de Graulhet were also gratefully acknowledged for the technological support.

Author information

Correspondence to Baiming Ren.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, B., Lyczko, N., Zhao, Y. et al. Integrating alum sludge with waste-activated sludge in co-conditioning and dewatering: a case study of a city in south France. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08056-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Alum sludge reuse
  • Circular economy
  • Jar test
  • Sewerage sludge
  • Techno-economic analysis
  • Waterworks residues