Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Biomethanation of invasive water hyacinth from eutrophic waters as a post weed management practice in the Dominican Republic: a developing country

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth (Pontederia crassipes Mart.) from eutrophic water bodies could be a sustainable post weed management practice to generate bioenergy. Comparative analyses of the water quality, physicochemical characteristics, and biomethanation kinetics of water hyacinth from two sites with different water types (brackish versus freshwater) in the Ozama river, Dominican Republic, were conducted. Also, the energy produced from the anaerobic digestion and that consumed in harvesting was estimated. The highest non-structural components in the form of protein (18.8 ± 1.9%) and extractives (26.4 ± 0.1%) were found in brackish water hyacinth, whereas that from freshwater had the highest amount of holocellulose (41.2 ± 2.8%). Indicators of plant productivity, i.e., chlorophyll b and bulk density, were more than 30% higher in brackish than in freshwater hyacinth. The methane production rate in the digestion of water hyacinth from brackish water (22.5 N. L/kg VS added· day) was twice that from freshwater (10.0 N. L/kg VSadded· day). The higher nutrient content in the brackish water could have influenced the superior performance of water hyacinth from that source compared with that from freshwater. Overall, the maximum methane potential of the Ozama river water hyacinth was 399.2 ± 32.2 N. L CH4/kg VSadded. The estimated energy produced per ton of fresh biomass was 846.5 MJ, but only 57.9 MJ would be required for mechanical harvesting. The biomethanation of water hyacinth can mitigate weed management costs in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Agblevor FA, Pereira J (2013) Progress in the summative analysis of biomass feedstocks for biofuel production. In: Wyman C (ed) Aqueous pretreatment of plant biomass for biological and chemical conversion to fuels and chemicals. p 335–354

  2. Ahn J-H, Do TH, Kim SD, Hwang S (2006) The effect of calcium on the anaerobic digestion treating swine wastewater. Biochem Eng J 30:33–38

  3. Ahn DJ, Se KK, Yun HS (2012) Optimization of pretreatment and saccharification for the production of bioethanol from water hyacinth by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0600-5

  4. Akendo ICO, Gumbe LO, Gitau AN (2008) Dewatering and drying characteristics of water hyacinth ( Eichhornia crassipes ) Petiole . Part II . Drying Characteristics. Agric Eng Int CIGR Ejournal X:1–11

  5. Alimi T, Akinyemiju A (1990) An economic analysis of water hyacinth control methods in Nigeria. J Aquat Plant Manag 28:105–107

  6. Angelidaki I, Sanders W (2004) Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. 117–129

  7. Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D et al (2009) Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 59:927–934. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.040

  8. Angelidaki I, Treu L, Tsapekos P et al (2018) Biogas upgrading and utilization: current status and perspectives. Biotechnol Adv 36:452–466

  9. Bryant CB (1969) Aquatic weed harvesting – effects and costs. Weeds Trees Turf October:14–17

  10. Chamier J, Schachtschneider K, le Maitre DC et al (2012) Impacts of invasive alien plants on water quality, with particular emphasis on South Africa. Water SA 38:345–356. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v38i2.19

  11. Chantada A (1991) Environment, crisis, and development: thoughts on the Ozama and Isabela rivers. Estud Soc 24:5–36

  12. Cheng X, Zhong C (2014) Effects of feed to inoculum ratio , co-digestion , and pretreatment on biogas production from anaerobic digestion of cotton stalk. Energy Fuel 28:3157–3166

  13. Cybulska I, Chaturvedi T, Alassali A et al (2014) Characterization of the chemical composition of the halophyte salicornia bigelovii under cultivation. Energy and Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500478b

  14. Daddy F, Abubakar S, Owotunse S (2002) Effects of different sources of water on water hyacinth growth performance. In: International conference on water hyacinth. National Institute for Freshwater Fisheries Research, Nigeria, New Bussa, pp 130–140

  15. Deka D, Das SP, Ravindran R, et al (2018) Water hyacinth as a potential source of biofuel for sustainable development. In: Sarma A., Singh V., Bhattacharjya R. KS (ed) urban ecology, Water Quality and Climate Change. Springer, pp 351–363

  16. Edelman DJ (2019) Managing the urban environment of Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic. Curr Urban Stud 7:76–142. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2019.71005

  17. Edwige S, Mahunon R, Aina MP et al (2018) Optimization process of organic matter removal from wastewater by using Eichhornia crassipes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29219–29226

  18. Etter H (1972) Effect of nitrogen nutrition upon sugar content and dry weight of juvenile lodgepole pine and white spruce. Can J For Res 2:434–440

  19. Feijoo G, Soto M (1995) Sodium inhibition in the anaerobic digestion process : antagonism and adaptation phenomena. Enzym Microb Technol 17:180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(94)00011-F

  20. Gallert C, Winter J (2005) Bacterial metabolism in wastewater treatment systems. In: Jördening H, Winter J (eds) Environmental Biotechnology. Wiley VCH, pp 1–48

  21. García R, Pizarro C, Lavín AG, Bueno JL (2013) Biomass proximate analysis using thermogravimetry. Bioresour Technol 139:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.197

  22. Gavilán H (2018) Inician recogida de basura en el Ozama con barcos especiales. List. D

  23. Gettys LA, Haller WT, Bellaud M (2009) Biology and control of aquatic plants - a best management practices handbook. October 210

  24. Gil A, Siles JA, Serrano A et al (2019) Effect of variation in the C /[ N 1 P ] ratio on anaerobic digestion. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 58:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12922

  25. Givnish TJ (1988) Adaptation to sun and shade : Aust J Plant Physiol 15:63–92

  26. Gong Y, Zhou X, Ma X, Chen J (2018) Sustainable removal of formaldehyde using controllable water hyacinth. J Clean Prod 181:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.220

  27. Holliger C, Alves M, Andrade D et al (2016) Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. Water Sci Technol 74:2515–2522. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.336

  28. Hronich JE, Martin L, Plawsky J, Bungay HR (2008) Potential of Eichhornia crassipes for biomass refining. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0333-x

  29. Jetter KM, Nes K (2018) The cost to manage invasive aquatic weeds in the California Bay-Delta. UC Giannini Found Agric Econ 21:9–11

  30. Jones RW (2001) Integrated control of water hyacinth on the Nseleni / Mposa Rivers and Lake Nsezi , Kwa Zulu-Natal , South Africa. Forestry 102:123–129

  31. de Jong W, Van Ommen JR (2015) “Biomass, a sustainable energy source for the future – fundamentals of conversion processes”

  32. Julong Q (2018) Aquatic weed harvester / aquatic plant harvester. In: Environ. Technol. Co., Ltd. http://www.dredgerjulong.com/news/aquaticweedharvester-aquaticplantharvester-16089524.html

  33. Kafle GK, Chen L (2016) Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models _ Elsevier Enhanced Reader.pdf. Waste Manag 48:492–502

  34. Khan AW, Trottier TM (1978) Effect of sulfur-containing compounds on anaerobic degradation of cellulose to methane by mixed cultures obtained from sewage sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol

  35. Lage-pinto F, Oliveira JG, Da M et al (2008) Chlorophyll a fluorescence and ultrastructural changes in chloroplast of water hyacinth as indicators of environmental stress. Environ Exp Bot 64:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.07.007

  36. Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350–382

  37. Lin R, Cheng J, Song W et al (2015) Characterisation of water hyacinth with microwave-heated alkali pretreatment for enhanced enzymatic digestibility and hydrogen/methane fermentation. Bioresour Technol 182:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.105

  38. Livermore DF, Bruhn HD, Pollock BW (1971) Processing characteristics of subsurface macrophytes of Madison, Wisconsin, lakes in relation to mechanical harvesting systems. Hidrobiologia 12:341–350

  39. Mahmood T, Malik S, Hussain S (2010) Biosorption and recovery of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) ash. BioResources 5:1244–1256

  40. Mani S, Womac AR, Ye XP, Narayan S (2008) Bulk density of wet and dry wheat straw and Switchgrass particles. Appl Eng Agric 24:351–358

  41. Mccarty PL, Mckinney RE (1961) Salt toxicity in anaerobic digestion. Water Pollut Control Fed 33:399–415

  42. Melignani E (2019) Growth , accumulation and uptake of Eichhornia crassipes exposed to high cadmium concentrations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:22826–22834

  43. Miño E., Sakuno Y, Okuda T, et al (2011) Field survey and satellite validation of water quality parameters of rivers in the surroundings of Santo Domingo metropolitan area , Dominican Republic pp 27–31

  44. Moyo P, Chapungu L, Mudzengi B (2013) Effectiveness of water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in remediating polluted water : the case of Shagashe river in Masvingo , Zimbabwe. Adv Appl Sci Res 4:55–62

  45. Nigam JN (2002) Bioconversion of water-hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) hemicellulose acid hydrolysate to motor fuel ethanol by xylose – fermenting yeast. J Biotechnol 97:107–116

  46. Parayil U, Velukutty B, Gopinath A, Muraleedharan S (2006) The impact of a salinity barrier on the partitioning of heavy metals in sediments of a tropical backwater system the impact of a salinity barrier on the partitioning of heavy metals in sediments of a tropical backwater system. Chem Speciat Bioavailab ISSN 18:153–167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09542299.2006.11073750

  47. Pavlović D, Nikolić B, Đurović S et al (2014) Chlorophyll as a measure of plant health : Agroecological aspects. Pestic Phytomed 29:21–34. https://doi.org/10.2298/PIF1401021P

  48. Pellegrini MOO, Horn CN, Almeida RF (2018) Total evidence phylogeny of Pontederiaceae ( Commelinales ) sheds light on the necessity of its recircumscription and synopsis of Pontederia L. PhytoKeys 83:25–83. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.108.27652

  49. Radu T, Blanchard RE, Wheatley AD (2017) Biogas for sustainable rural communities. In: Kalyuzhnova Y, Pomfret R (eds) sustainable energy in Kazakhstan, 1st edn. London, p 20

  50. Roshanak S, Rahimmalek M, Amir S, Goli H (2016) Evaluation of seven different drying treatments in respect to total flavonoid , phenolic , vitamin C content , chlorophyll , antioxidant activity and color of green tea ( Camellia sinensis or C . assamica ) leaves. J Food Sci Technol 53:721–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2030-x

  51. Saha P, Shinde O, Sarkar S (2017) Phytoremediation of industrial mines wastewater using water hyacinth. Int J Phytoremediation ISSN 19:87–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2016.1216078

  52. Salas H, Martino P (1988) Evaluación y control de la contaminación de las aguas superficiales en la vecindad de Santo Domingo

  53. Sekar A, Ansari M (2018) Phyto-remediation of total dissolved solids (TDS) by Eichhornia Crassipes, Pistia Stratiotes and Chrysopogon Zizanioides from second stage RO-brine solution. Res J Chem Environ 22:

  54. Shirinpur-valadi A, Hatamzadeh A, Sedaghathoor S (2019) Study of the accumulation of contaminants by Cyperus alternifolius , Lemna minor , Eichhornia crassipes , and Canna × generalis in some contaminated aquatic environments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:21340–21350

  55. Smith JL (1984) Mechanical harvesting of aquatic plants. Report 3 Evaluation of the Limnos system

  56. Swenson HA, Baldwin HL (1965) A primer on water quality

  57. Ting WHT, Tan IAW, Salleh SF, Wahab NA (2018) Application of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) for phytoremediation of ammoniacal nitrogen: a review. J Water Process Eng 22:239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.02.011

  58. Vaz SJ (2016) Analytical techniques and methods for biomass. Springer, Brasilia

  59. Venter N, Cowie BW, Witkowski ETF et al (2017) The amphibious invader: rooted water hyacinth’s morphological and physiological strategy to survive stranding and drought events. Aquat Bot 143:41–48

  60. Wang D, Huang H, Shen F et al (2016) Effects of biomass densification on anaerobic digestion for biogas production. RSC Adv 6:91748–91755

  61. Wang J, Fu Z, Qiao H, Liu F (2019) Assessment of eutrophication and water quality in the estuarine area of Lake Wuli, Lake Taihu, China. Sci Total Environ 650:1392–1402

  62. Wellinger A, Murphy J, Baxter D (2013) The biogas handbook: science, production and applications, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing

  63. Wolverton BC, McKown MM (1976) Water hyacinths for removal of phenols from polluted waters. Aquat Bot 2:191–201

  64. Wyk E, Wilgen B (2002) The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options. African J Aquat Sci 27:141–149. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2002.9626585

  65. Xia A, Cheng J, Song W et al (2013) Enhancing enzymatic sacchari fi cation of water hyacinth through microwave heating with dilute acid pretreatment for biomass energy utilization. Energy 61:158–166

  66. Zhang Y, Liu H, Yan S et al (2019) Phosphorus removal from the hyper-eutrophic Lake Caohai ( China ) with large-scale water hyacinth cultivation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:12975–12984

  67. Zhao J, Liu Y, Wang D et al (2017) Potential impact of salinity on methane production from food waste anaerobic digestion _ Elsevier Enhanced Reader.pdf. Waste Manag 67:308–317

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from the Microscopy Core Facility at Utah State University for the SEM results; Jose Antonio Sanchez Borbon and Willy Maurer for helping on the collection, and preparation of the biomass; and Natalia Ruiz and Dalia Jones under the supervision of Teodoro Classe from the Dr. Rafael M. Moscoso National Botanical Garden of Dominican Republic for their work on the identification of the macrophytes.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the National Research Fund for Science, Technology, and Innovation [FONDOCYT 2015-2A3-123] of the Dominican Republic Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology (MESCYT).

Author information

Correspondence to Yessica A. Castro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Ta Yeong Wu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castro, Y.A., Agblevor, F.A. Biomethanation of invasive water hyacinth from eutrophic waters as a post weed management practice in the Dominican Republic: a developing country. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07927-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Eutrophication
  • Eichhornia crassipes
  • Anaerobic digestion
  • Chemical composition
  • Biomethane
  • Chlorophyll
  • Brackish water
  • Kinetics