Advertisement

Comparative study of vermicomposting of garden waste and cow dung using Eisenia fetida

  • Yingkai Li
  • Xiaolei Yang
  • Wen Gao
  • Jiangping Qiu
  • Yinsheng LiEmail author
Research Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Vermicomposting is the process of composting using worms and is applied in waste management to produce high-quality organic fertilizer. Garden waste (GW) is often mixed with other raw materials for vermicomposting. In the present study, the feasibility of vermicomposting using only GW was investigated in comparison with cow dung (CD). The total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and total potassium (TK) contents and the electrical conductivity increased, while total organic carbon (TOC) and the C/N ratio decreased in both substrates after vermicomposting. The nutrient content (TN, TP, and TK) of the GW vermicompost was promoted less than that in CD. Scanning electron microscopy images and specific surface area analysis showed that the vermicompost was strongly disaggregated and became more compacted and fragmented compared with the raw substrates. No mortality of earthworms was observed in GW; however, the earthworms had a higher mean body weight and reproduction rate in CD than that in GW. There were higher bacterial community richness and diversity in the vermicompost than that in the raw materials, and the dominant phylum species were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. Redundancy analysis demonstrated that TN, C/N ratio, and TOC play an important role in bacterial community dynamics. These data indicate that vermicomposting is a robust process that is suitable for the management of GW.

Keywords

Garden waste Cow dung Vermicomposting Eisenia fetida Biomass and reproduction Bacterial community Waste and vermicompost characteristics 

Notes

Funding information

This research was supported by Key projects of Shanghai Municipal Agricultural Commission (2016 No. 6-3-2).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aira M, Olcina J, Pérez-Losada M, Domínguez J (2016) Characterization of the bacterial communities of casts from Eisenia andrei fed with different substrates. Appl Soil Ecol 98:103–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alidadi H, Hosseinzadeh A, Najafpoor AA, Esmaili H, Zanganeh J, Dolatabadi Takabi M, Piranloo FG (2016) Waste recycling by vermicomposting: maturity and quality assessment via dehydrogenase enzyme activity, lignin, water soluble carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous and other indicators. J Environ Manag 182:134–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ananthavalli R, Ramadas V, John Paul JA, Karunai Selvi B, Karmegam N (2019) Seaweeds as bioresources for vermicompost production using the earthworm, Perionyx excavatus (Perrier). Bioresour Technol 275:394–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora M, Kaur A (2019) Scanning electron microscopy for analysing maturity of compost/vermicompost from crop residue spiked with cattle dung, Azolla pinnata and Aspergillus terreus. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:1761–1769.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3673-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhat SA, Singh J, Vig AP (2018) Earthworms as organic waste managers and biofertilizer producers. Waste Biomass Valorization 9:1073–1086.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9899-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Zhang Q, Zhang Y et al (2015a) Changes in fibrolytic enzyme activity during vermicomposting of maize stover by an anecic earthworm Amynthas hupeiensis. Polym Degrad Stabil 120:169–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Xu L, Li R, Luo X, Zhang X, Tong J (2015b) Earthworms modify microbial community structure and accelerate maize stover decomposition during vermicomposting. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:17161–17170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4955-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y, Chang SKC, Chen J, Zhang Q, Yu H (2018) Characterization of microbial community succession during vermicomposting of medicinal herbal residues. Bioresour Technol 249:542–549.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen M, Huang Y, Liu H et al (2019) Impact of different nitrogen source on the compost quality and greenhouse gas emissions during composting of garden waste. Process Saf Environ Protect 124:326–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cui G, Li F, Li S, Bhat SA, Ishiguro Y, Wei Y, Yamada T, Fu X, Huang K (2018) Changes of quinolone resistance genes and their relations with microbial profiles during vermicomposting of municipal excess sludge. Sci Total Environ 644:494–502.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Das D, Bhattacharyya P, Ghosh BC, Banik P (2016) Bioconversion and biodynamics of Eisenia foetida in different organic wastes through microbially enriched vermiconversion technologies. Ecol Eng 86:154–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fracchia L, Dohrmann AB, Martinotti MG, Tebbe CC (2006) Bacterial diversity in a finished compost and vermicompost: differences revealed by cultivation-independent analyses of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71:942.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0228-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu X, Huang K, Chen X, Li F, Cui G (2015) Feasibility of vermistabilization for fresh pelletized dewatered sludge with earthworms Bimastus parvus. Bioresour Technol 175:646–650.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabhane J, William SPMP, Bidyadhar R et al (2012) Additives aided composting of green waste: effects on organic matter degradation, compost maturity, and quality of the finished compost. Bioresour Technol 114:382–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gong X, Cai L, Li S et al (2018) Bamboo biochar amendment improves the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida and the quality of green waste vermicompost. Ecotox Environ Safe 156:197–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gong X, Li S, Chang SX et al (2019) Alkyl polyglycoside and earthworm (Eisenia fetida) enhance biodegradation of green waste and its use for growing vegetables. Ecotox Environ Safe 167:459–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goyal S, Dhull SK, Kapoor KK (2005) Chemical and biological changes during composting of different organic wastes and assessment of compost maturity. Bioresour Technol 96:1584–1591.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grycova B, Pryszcz A, Lestinsky P, Chamradova K (2018) Influence of potassium hydroxide and method of carbonization treatment in garden and corn waste microwave pyrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 118:40–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.07.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanc A, Chadimova Z (2014) Nutrient recovery from apple pomace waste by vermicomposting technology. Bioresour Technol 168:240–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haynes RJ, Zhou Y-F (2016) Comparison of the chemical, physical and microbial properties of composts produced by conventional composting or vermicomposting using the same feedstocks. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:10763–10772.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6197-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang K, Li F, Wei Y, Chen X, Fu X (2013) Changes of bacterial and fungal community compositions during vermicomposting of vegetable wastes by Eisenia foetida. Bioresour Technol 150:235–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2016) Vermiremediation of an invasive and pernicious weed salvinia (Salvinia molesta). Ecol Eng 91:432–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karmegam N, Vijayan P, Prakash M, John Paul JA (2019) Vermicomposting of paper industry sludge with cowdung and green manure plants using Eisenia fetida: a viable option for cleaner and enriched vermicompost production. J Clean Prod 228:718–728.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khalil A, Domeizel M, Prudent P (2008) Monitoring of green waste composting process based on redox potential. Bioresour Technol 99:6037–6045.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lazcano C, Gómez-Brandón M, Domínguez J (2008) Comparison of the effectiveness of composting and vermicomposting for the biological stabilization of cattle manure. Chemosphere 72:1013–1019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li X, Xing M, Yang J, Huang Z (2011) Compositional and functional features of humic acid-like fractions from vermicomposting of sewage sludge and cow dung. J Hazard Mater 185:740–748.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim SL, Wu TY (2015) Determination of maturity in the vermicompost produced from palm oil mill effluent using spectroscopy, structural characterization and thermogravimetric analysis. Ecol Eng 84:515–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lim SL, Wu TY, Lim PN, Shak KPY (2015) The use of vermicompost in organic farming: overview, effects on soil and economics. J Sci Food Agric 95:1143–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6849 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lim SL, Lee LH, Wu TY (2016) Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. J Clean Prod 111:262–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu J, Lu Z, Yang J, Xing M, Yu F, Guo M (2012) Effect of earthworms on the performance and microbial communities of excess sludge treatment process in vermifilter. Bioresour Technol 117:214–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu D, Lian B, Wu C, Guo P (2018) A comparative study of gut microbiota profiles of earthworms fed in three different substrates. Symbiosis 74:21–29.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-017-0491-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lowell S, Shields JE, Thomas MA, Thommes M (2012) Characterization of porous solids and powders: surface area, Pore Size and Density. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  33. Lv B, Xing M, Yang J, Zhang L (2015) Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial community differences in composting and vermicomposting on the stabilization of mixed sewage sludge and cattle dung. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:10703–10712.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6884-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lv B, Xing M, Yang J (2018) Exploring the effects of earthworms on bacterial profiles during vermicomposting process of sewage sludge and cattle dung with high-throughput sequencing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:12528–12537.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1520-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malińska K, Zabochnicka-Świątek M, Cáceres R, Marfà O (2016) The effect of precomposted sewage sludge mixture amended with biochar on the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida during laboratory vermicomposting. Ecol Eng 90:35–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mupambwa HA, Mnkeni PNS (2018) Optimizing the vermicomposting of organic wastes amended with inorganic materials for production of nutrient-rich organic fertilizers: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:10577–10595.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1328-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part, vol 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 539–580.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Owojori OJ, Reinecke AJ (2009) Avoidance behaviour of two eco-physiologically different earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Aporrectodea caliginosa) in natural and artificial saline soils. Chemosphere 75:279–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.12.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ren G, Xu X, Qu J, Zhu L, Wang T (2016) Evaluation of microbial population dynamics in the co-composting of cow manure and rice straw using high throughput sequencing analysis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2059-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharma K, Garg VK (2018) Comparative analysis of vermicompost quality produced from rice straw and paper waste employing earthworm Eisenia fetida (Sav.). Bioresour Technol 250:708–715.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sharma D, Yadav KD, Kumar S (2018) Role of sawdust and cow dung on compost maturity during rotary drum composting of flower waste. Bioresour Technol 264:285–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shi Y, Ge Y, Chang J et al (2013) Garden waste biomass for renewable and sustainable energy production in China: potential, challenges and development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22:432–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soobhany N, Mohee R, Garg VK (2015) Experimental process monitoring and potential of Eudrilus eugeniae in the vermicomposting of organic solid waste in Mauritius. Ecol Eng 84:149–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soobhany N, Gunasee S, Rago YP, Joyram H, Raghoo P, Mohee R, Garg VK (2017) Spectroscopic, thermogravimetric and structural characterization analyses for comparing municipal solid waste composts and vermicomposts stability and maturity. Bioresour Technol 236:11–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suthar S (2007) Nutrient changes and biodynamics of epigeic earthworm Perionyx excavatus (Perrier) during recycling of some agriculture wastes. Bioresour Technol 98:1608–1614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Suthar S (2009) Vermistabilization of municipal sewage sludge amended with sugarcane trash using epigeic Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). J Hazard Mater 163:199–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swarnam TP, Velmurugan A, Pandey SK, Dam Roy S (2016) Enhancing nutrient recovery and compost maturity of coconut husk by vermicomposting technology. Bioresour Technol 207:76–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Varma VS, Yadav J, Das S, Kalamdhad AS (2015) Potential of waste carbide sludge addition on earthworm growth and organic matter degradation during vermicomposting of agricultural wastes. Ecol Eng 83:90–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vig AP, Singh J, Wani SH, Singh Dhaliwal S (2011) Vermicomposting of tannery sludge mixed with cattle dung into valuable manure using earthworm Eisenia fetida (Savigny). Bioresour Technol 102:7941–7945.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xing M, Lv B, Zhao C, Yang J (2015) Towards understanding the effects of additives on the vermicomposting of sewage sludge. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4644–4653.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3708-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yadav A, Garg VK (2019) Biotransformation of bakery industry sludge into valuable product using vermicomposting. Bioresour Technol 274:512–517.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yu Q, Chen L, Wang W et al (2018) Impact of blending on hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation of garden wastes. J Clean Prod 190:36–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang L, Sun X (2016) Influence of bulking agents on physical, chemical, and microbiological properties during the two-stage composting of green waste. Waste Manag 48:115–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang J, Zeng G, Chen Y, Yu M, Yu Z, Li H, Yu Y, Huang H (2011) Effects of physico-chemical parameters on the bacterial and fungal communities during agricultural waste composting. Bioresour Technol 102:2950–2956.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Agriculture and BiologyShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Shanghai Agricultural Technology Extension Service CenterShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Shanghai Shengran Agricultural Technology Co., LtdShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations