Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Composition and toxicity of particulate matter emitted from turbocharged common rail DME–biodiesel engine

  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

Both ultrafine particle and toxicity emissions originating from diesel engine gain an increasing concern. In this study, size distribution and toxicity of particles from a turbocharged common rail engine fueled with clean fuels—dimethyl ether (DME) and biodiesel blends—were investigated. Effects of different DME–biodiesel blends (B0, B5, B10, and B15) and different engine loads were considered. The results demonstrate that particles emitted from DME–biodiesel engine are mainly in form of nucleation mode. Engine running at intermediate load exhausts the maximum number of accumulation mode particles owing to local hypoxia and not high enough combustion temperature. The addition of biodiesel slightly increases the total particle number, peak of particle number concentration, and particle size corresponding to the peak. Effect of biodiesel proportion on particle size distribution gets weaker with the increase of engine load. Engine fueled with B5, B10, and B15 mainly exhausts low molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (ring number ≤ 4) which are closely related to unburned fuel, and the total PAH emissions are linear versus the fuel consumption. Toxicity equivalent (TE) of particles at low load is lower than that at intermediate load. DME–biodiesel blends with biodiesel mass proportion ≤ 15% can release the DME engine from abrasion and leakage, but no obvious increase in both particle emissions and the risk of particle toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Abbreviations

ATDC:

Start of injection timing (°CA)

B0:

100% DME

B5:

95% DME + 5% biodiesel

B10:

90% DME + 10% biodiesel

B15:

85% DME + 15% biodiesel

BMEP:

Brake mean effective pressure (MPa)

BSFC:

Brake-specific fuel consumption (g/kWh)

BTE:

Brake thermal efficiency

CA50 :

Crank angle position for 50% burned mass fraction (°CA ATDC)

CO:

Carbon monoxide

DME:

Dimethyl ether

D p :

Particle diameter (nm)

EBSFC:

Equivalent brake-specific fuel consumption (g/kWh)

EGR:

Exhaust gas recirculation

HC:

Hydrocarbon

HRR:

Heat release rate (J/°CA)

MPRR:

Maximum cylinder pressure rising rate (MPa/°CA)

n :

Speed (rpm)

NOx :

Nitrogen oxide

p :

In-cylinder pressure (MPa)

PAH:

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon

P inj :

Injection pressure (MPa)

SOI:

Start of injection timing (°CA)

tr:

Temperature of exhaust gas (°C)

References

  1. Ballesteros R, Hernandes JJ, Lyons LL (2010) An experimental study of the influence of biofuel origin on particle-associated PAH emissions. Atmos Environ 44:930–938

  2. Benajes J, Novella R, Pastor JM et al (2018) Computational optimization of the combustion system of a heavy duty direct injection diesel engine operating with dimethyl-ether. Fuel 218:127–139

  3. Borillo GC, Tadano YS, Afl G et al (2018) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and nitrated analogs associated to particulate matter emission from a Euro V-SCR engine fuelled with diesel/biodiesel blends. Sci Total Environ 644:675

  4. Bortey-Sam N, Ikenaka Y, Akoto O, Nakayama SM, Yohannes YB, Baidoo E, Mizukawa H, Ishizuka M (2015) Levels, potential sources and human health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in particulate matter (PM 10) in Kumasi, Ghana. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(13):9658–9667

  5. Cipolat D. (2007) The Effect of fuel characteristics on the fuel injection process in a CI engine fuelled on diesel and DME, SAE Technical Paper 2007;2007-24-0119

  6. Cipolat D, Bhana N (2009) Fuelling of a compression ignition engine on ethanol with DME as ignition promoter: effect of injector configuration. Fuel Process Technol 90(9):1107–1113

  7. Collier A, Rhead M, Trier C, Bell M (1995) Polycyclic aromatic compound profiles from a light-duty direct-injection diesel engine. Fuel 74:362–367

  8. Di Y, Cheung CS, Huang Z (2009) Comparison of the effect of biodiesel-diesel and ethanol-diesel on the gaseous emission of a direct-injection diesel engine. Atmos Environ 43(5):455–465

  9. Geng P, Tan Q, Zhang C, Wei L, He X, Cao E, Jiang K (2016) Experimental investigation on NOx and green house gas emissions from a marine auxiliary diesel engine using ultralow sulfur light fuel. Sci Total Environ 572:467–475

  10. Ghadikolaei MA, Cheung CS, Yung KF (2018) Study of combustion, performance and emissions of diesel engine fueled with diesel/biodiesel/alcohol blends having the same oxygen concentration. Energy 157:258–269

  11. Guarieiro ALN, Santos JVDS, Eiguren-Fernandez A et al (2014) Redox activity and PAH content in size-classified nanoparticles emitted by a diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel and diesel blends. Fuel 116(1):490–497

  12. Hilden DL, Mayer WJ (1984) The contribution of engine oil to particulate exhaust emissions from light-duty, diesel-powered vehicles. SAE Paper 841395

  13. Hou J, Wen Z, Jiang Z et al (2014) Study on combustion and emissions of a turbocharged compression ignition engine fueled with dimethyl ether and biodiesel blends. J Energy Inst 87(2):102–113

  14. Hu EJ, Jiang X, Huang ZH et al (2012) Experimental and kinetic studies on ignition delay times of dimethyl ether/n-butane/O2/Ar mixtures. Energy Fuel 27(1):530–536

  15. Hyun G, Oguma M (2002) Spray and exhaust emission characteristics of a biodiesel engine operating with the blend of plant oil and DME. SAE Technical Paper Series 2002;2002-01-0864

  16. Jiang X, Zhang YJ, Man XJ et al (2013) Shock tube measurements and kinetic study on ignition delay times of lean DME/n-butane blends at elevated pressures. Energy Fuels 27(10):6238–6246

  17. Kim HJ, Park SH, Lee CS (2010) A study on the macroscopic spray behavior and atomization characteristics of biodiesel and dimethyl ether sprays under increased ambient pressure. Fuel Process Technol 91(3):354–363

  18. Lamani VT, Yadav AK, Narayanappa KG (2017) Influence of low-temperature combustion and dimethyl ether-diesel blends on performance, combustion, and emission characteristics of common rail diesel engine: a CFD study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(18):15500–15509

  19. Li XL, Huang Z, Wang JS et al (2008) Characteristics of ultrafine particles emitted from a dimethyl ether (DME) engine. Chin Sci Bull 53(2):304–312

  20. Lin Y, Lee et al (2006) Comparison of PAH and regulated harmful matter emissions from biodiesel blends and paraffinic fuel blends on engine accumulated mileage test. Fuel 85(17):2516–2523

  21. Liu W, Qiao X, Wang J et al (2008) Effects of combustion mode on exhaust particle size distribution produced by an engine fueled by dimethyl ether (DME). Energy Fuel 22(6):3838–3843

  22. Lu T, Huang Z, Cheung CS, Ma J (2012) Size distribution of EC, OC and particle-phase PAHs emissions from a diesel engine fueled with three fuels. Sci Total Environ 438:33–41

  23. Marr LC, Kirchstetter TW, Harley RA, Miguel AH, Hering SV (1999) Characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in motor vehicles fuels and exhaust emissions. Environ Sci Technol 33:3091–3099

  24. Musthafa MM, Kumar TA, Mohanraj T et al (2018) A comparative study on performance, combustion and emission characteristics of diesel engine fueled by biodiesel blends with and without an additive. Fuel 225:343–348

  25. Nisbet IC, Lagoy PK (1992) Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Regulatory Toxicol Pharmacol 16(3):290–300

  26. Park SH, Lee CS (2014) Applicability of dimethyl ether (DME) in a compression ignition engine as an alternative fuel. Energy Convers Manag 86:848–863

  27. Peng G, Cao E, Tan Q et al (2017) Effects of alternative fuels on the combustion characteristics and emission products from diesel engines: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:523–534

  28. Ren Y, Huang ZH, Miao HY et al (2008) Combustion and emissions of a DI diesel engine fueled with diesel-oxygenate. Fuel 87(12):2691–2697

  29. Roh HG, Lee D, Chang SL (2015) Impact of DME-biodiesel, diesel-biodiesel and diesel fuels on the combustion and emission reduction characteristics of a CI engine according to pilot and single injection strategies. J Energy Inst 88(4):376–385

  30. Saffaripour M, Veshkini A, Kholghy M et al (2014) Experimental investigation and detailed modeling of soot aggregate formation and size distribution in laminar coflow diffusion flames of Jet A-1, a synthetic kerosene, and n-decane. Combustion & Flame 161(3):848–863

  31. Şen M, Emiroğlu AO, Keskin A (2018) Production of biodiesel from broiler chicken rendering fat and investigation of its effects on combustion, performance, and emissions of a diesel engine. Energy Fuel 32(4):5209–5217

  32. Shi GL, Liu GR, Tian YZ et al (2014) Chemical characteristic and toxicity assessment of particle associated PAHs for the short-term anthropogenic activity event: during the Chinese New Year’s Festival in 2013. Science of the Total Environment 482–483:8–14

  33. Song J, Huang Z, Qiao X et al (2004) Performance of a controllable premixed combustion engine fueled with dimethyl ether. Energy Conversion & Management 45(13):2223–2232

  34. Song WW, He KB, Wang JX, Wang XT, Shi XY, Yu C, Chen WM, Zheng L (2011) Emissions of EC, OC, and PAHs from cottonseed oil biodiesel in a heavy-duty diesel engine. Environmental Science & Technology 45(15):6683–6689

  35. Soni DK, Gupta R (2017) Application of nano emulsion method in a methanol powered diesel engine. Energy 126:638–648

  36. Stone R. Introduction to internal combustion engines, 4th edition editio. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012

  37. Tan PQ, Zhong YM, Hu ZY et al (2017) Size distributions, PAHs and inorganic ions of exhaust particles from a heavy duty diesel engine using B20 biodiesel with different exhaust aftertreatments. Energy 141(15):898–906

  38. USA EPA. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. EPA 610 1992;441–454

  39. Wang Y, Li G, Zhu W et al (2008) Study on the application of DME/diesel blends in a diesel engine. Fuel Process Technol 89(12):1272–1280

  40. Wang Z, Qiao X, Hou J et al (2011) Combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel/dimethyl ether blends. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 225(12):1683–1691

  41. Wang XG, Cheung CS, Di YG et al (2012) Diesel engine gaseous and particle emissions fueled with diesel-oxygenate blends. Fuel 94:317–323

  42. Yilmaz N, Davis SM (2016) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) formation in a diesel engine fueled with diesel, biodiesel and biodiesel/n-butanol blends. Fuel 181:729–740

Download references

Funding

This project was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFE0130800), Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. GG19E060001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91441124 and 91741122),and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018 M642014).

Author information

Correspondence to Xinqi Qiao.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, C., Qiao, X., Ju, D. et al. Composition and toxicity of particulate matter emitted from turbocharged common rail DME–biodiesel engine. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07639-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dimethyl ether
  • Biodiesel
  • Engine
  • Particle
  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon