Advertisement

Does ICT lessen CO2 emissions for fast-emerging economies? An application of the heterogeneous panel estimations

  • Faisal FaisalEmail author
  • Azizullah
  • Turgut Tursoy
  • Ruqiya Pervaiz
Research Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the effects of electricity consumption, financial development, economic growth, trade and ICT on CO2 emissions in the fast-emerging countries, excluding Russia due to the unavailability of data. Cross-sectional dependency was identified using the Pesaran (2004) and Breusch and Pagan CD tests from Breusch and Pagan (1980) using annual data from 1993 to 2014 based on data availability. The second-generation panel unit root test was applied to investigate the integration order of the series. The long-run relationship among the variables was confirmed using second-generation panel cointegration techniques, which take cross-sectional dependency into account. Additionally, this study utilized the FMOLS, DOLS and robust least square estimators to determine the long-run coefficients. The results suggested that electricity usage and financial development have a positive and significant impact, while economic growth and trade have a negative and significant impact on CO2 emissions. Additionally, an inverted U-shaped relationship between ICT and CO2 emission was confirmed. This implies that pollution declines after attaining a threshold point as the ICT usage increases. Furthermore, the Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) heterogeneous panel causality test suggested that there is a unidirectional causal relationship between electricity consumption and CO2 emissions, CO2 emissions and ICT, gross domestic product and CO2 emissions. Another unidirectional causality exists between financial development and CO2 emissions. The study suggests that renewable energy sources can be adopted to decrease carbon emissions and to promote clean energy. Financial development needs to be further strengthened to promote the use of eco-friendly ICT products.

Keywords

ICT Westerlund panel Electricity use Environmental degradation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions that substantially improved the article.

References

  1. Anderianaivo M, Kpodar K (2011) ICT, financial inclusion, and growth evidence from African countries (IMF Working Papers) 11:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asongu SA, Nwachukwu JC (2017) The synergy of financial sector development and information sharing in financial access: propositions and empirical evidence. Res Int Bus Financ 40:242–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asongu SA (2018) ICT, openness and CO 2 emissions in Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:9351–9359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya M, Paramati SR, Ozturk I, Bhattacharya S (2016) The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: evidence from top 38 countries. Appl Energy 162:733–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binuyo AO, Aregbeshola RA (2015) ICT adoption and economic growth nexus: evidence from leading African economies. J Econ Behav Stud 7:43–54Google Scholar
  6. Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Y, Zhu J (2004) Measuring information technology’s indirect impact. Inf Technol Manag 5:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi C (2010) The effect of the Internet on service trade. Econ Lett 109:102–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29387–29396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu K (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ 0958305X19834279Google Scholar
  11. Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dogan E, Seker F, Bulbul S (2017) Investigating the impacts of energy consumption, real GDP, tourism and trade on CO2 emissions by accounting for cross-sectional dependence: a panel study of OECD countries. Curr Issue Tour 20:1701–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:10846–10854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dogan E, Seker F (2016a) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dogan E, Seker F (2016b) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ertugrul HM, Cetin M, Seker F, Dogan E (2016) The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecol Indic 67:543–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faisal F, Tursoy T, Resatoglu NG (2017) Is there any causality between financial development, energy consumption and economic growth in Pakistan? Evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach and vector error correction model. Int J Ecol Econ Stat 38:33–48Google Scholar
  19. Faisal F, Tursoy T, Berk N (2018) Linear and non-linear impact of Internet usage and financial deepening on electricity consumption for Turkey: empirical evidence from asymmetric causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:11536–11555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996) Practitioners corner: tests for cointegration in models with regime and trend shifts. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 58:555–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hermes N, Lensink R (2003) Foreign direct investment, financial development and economic growth. J Dev Stud 40:142–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Irawan T (2014) ICT and economic development: comparing ASEAN member states. IEEP 11:97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishida H (2014) The effect of ICT development on economic growth and energy consumption in Japan. Telematics Inform 32:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan N, Baloch MA, Saud S, Fatima T (2018) The effect of ICT on CO 2 emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:22850–22860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khraief N, Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Loganathan N (2018) Estimation of electricity demand function for Algeria: revisit of time series analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:4221–4234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King RG, Levine R (1993) Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Q J Econ 108:717–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Latif Z, Latif S, Ximei L, Pathan ZH, Salam S, Jianqiu Z (2018) The dynamics of ICT, foreign direct investment, globalization and economic growth: panel estimation robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Telematics Inform 35:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lechman E, Marszk A (2015) ICT technologies and financial innovations: the case of exchange traded funds in Brazil, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the United States. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 99:355–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mac Kinnon R (1973) Money and Capital in Economic Development, the Brookings Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Malmodin J, Moberg Å, Lundén D, Finnveden G, Lövehagen N (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions and operational electricity use in the ICT and entertainment & media sectors. J Ind Ecol 14:770–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendonca MAA, Freitas F, Souza JM (2008) Information technology and productivity: evidence for Brazilian industry from firm-level data. Inf Technol Dev 14:136–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moyer JD, Hughes BB (2012) ICTs: do they contribute to increased carbon emissions? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79:919–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mun HW, Lin TK, Man YK (2008) FDI and economic growth relationship: an empirical study on Malaysia. Int Bus Res 1:11–18Google Scholar
  34. Persyn D, Westerlund J (2008) Error-correction–based cointegration tests for panel data. Stata J 8:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panelsGoogle Scholar
  36. Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 47:36–37.  https://doi.org/10.1002/JAE951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Norman NR (2015) The dynamics of information and communications technologies infrastructure, economic growth, and financial development: evidence from Asian countries. Technol Soc 42:135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Hall JH (2016a) Economic growth, development of telecommunications infrastructure, and financial development in Asia, 1991–2012. QREF 59:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pradhan RP, Mallik G, Bagchi TP (2018) Information communication technology (ICT) infrastructure and economic growth: a causality evinced by cross-country panel data. IIMB Manag Rev 30:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Nair M, Bennett SE, Hall JH (2019) The information revolution, innovation diffusion and economic growth: an examination of causal links in European countries. Qual Quant 53:1529–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pradhan RP, Arvin M, Nair M, Bennett S, Bahmani S (2016b) ICT-finance-growth nexus: empirical evidence from the Next-11 countries. Cuad Econ 40:115–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesjef.2016.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paramati SR, Ummalla M, Apergis N (2016) The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies. Energy Econ 56:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sadorsky P (2012) Information communication technology and electricity consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 48:130–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I, Sohag K (2018) The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2002–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salahuddin M, Alam K (2015) Internet usage, electricity consumption and economic growth in Australia: a time series evidence. Telematics Inform 32:862–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Salahuddin M, Alam K (2016) Information and communication technology, electricity consumption and economic growth in OECD countries: a panel data analysis. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 76:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Salahuddin M, Gow J (2016) The effects of Internet usage, financial development and trade openness on economic growth in South Africa: a time series analysis. Telematics Inform 33:1141–1154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I (2016) The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a panel investigation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:1226–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shahbaz M, Lean HH (2012a) Does financial development increase energy consumption? The role of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia. Energy Policy 40:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shahbaz M, Lean HH (2012b) The dynamics of electricity consumption and economic growth: a revisit study of their causality in Pakistan. Energy 39:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shahbaz M, Rehman I, Sbia R, Hamdi H (2016) The role of information communication technology and economic growth in recent electricity demand: fresh evidence from Combine cointegration approach in UAE. J Knowl Econ 7:797–818.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0250-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shahiduzzaman M, Alam K (2014) The long-run impact of information and communication technology on economic output: the case of Australia. Telecommun Policy 38:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suri V, Chapman D (1998) Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vu KM (2011) ICT as a source of economic growth in the information age: Empirical evidence from the 1996–2005 period. Telecommun Policy 35:357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. World Bank 2016. World Development IndicatorsGoogle Scholar
  57. World Bank (2018) World Development Indicators. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org
  58. Yucel F (2009) Causal relationships between financial development, trade openness and economic growth: the case of Turkey. J Soc sci 5:33–42Google Scholar
  59. Zhang C, Liu C (2015) The impact of ICT industry on CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zaidi SAH, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 228:533–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10:251–270Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Business Studies and Leadership, Faculty of Business and EconomicsAbdul Wali Khan UniversityMardanPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Banking and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administrative SciencesNear East University, NicosiaNorth Cyprus, Mersin 10Turkey
  3. 3.Faculty of Chemical and Life Sciences, Department of ZoologyAbdul Wali Khan UniversityMardanPakistan

Personalised recommendations