Adaption of green composite in automotive part replacements: discussions on material modification and future patronage

  • Oludaisi AdekomayaEmail author
Short Research and Discussion Article


The purpose of this paper is to discuss the concept of green composite in automotive part replacement. Adaptation of lightweight materials in transport system has been an integral part of weight saving measures in car’s component formation. The continuing rise in ambient temperature is a signal no scientist would ever ignore in the face of global warming and attendant water level surge. Reduction of body system of automobile vehicles has been ongoing for several years with huge patronage on synthetic materials. The sudden attention to green composite may not be unconnected with the environmental impact of vehicular materials after their life cycle. This has led to the improved properties of polymeric materials to replace ferrous and nonferrous metals in vehicle formation. In this paper, an in-depth study was undertaken on sustainable green materials limiting the scope on the plant fibre for automotive part replacement. Plant fibres are increasingly gaining momentum in view of their recyclability and environmental friendliness. It has been noted that nearly all automakers are exploring the recyclable or biodegradable materials for part replacement, making the green composite a material for the future. Part of the attracting properties of plant fibres is their relative high strength and stiffness with low cost and low CO2 emission. This is also, in addition, to their biodegradability and renewability. Further discussion in this paper centred on the difficulty in the modification of plant fibre for sustainable compatibility in part formations. Key of the conclusions drawn from this work indicates a promising future for plant fibres with enormous challenges relating to their chemical treatment.


Green materials Automotive parts Weight reduction Sustainability Climate change 



The author would like to appreciate National Research Foundation (NRF) and Department of Science and Technology (DST) for funding the fellowship leading to this manuscript. Appreciation also goes to the School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of the Witwatersrand, for providing the platform to conduct this research. The constructive comments received from the two anonymous reviewers and the guest editor are appreciated.


  1. Adekomaya O, Jamiru T, Sadiku R, Huan Z (2017a) Minimizing energy consumption in refrigerated vehicles through alternative external wall. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adekomaya O, Jamiru T, Sadiku R, Huan Z (2017b) Negative impact from the application of natural fibers. J Clean Prod 143:843–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akampumuza O, Wambua PM, Ahmed A, Li W, Qin XH (2017) Review of the applications of biocomposites in the automotive industry. Polym Compos 38:2553–2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashori A (2008) Wood–plastic composites as promising green-composites for automotive industries! Bioresour Technol 99:4661–4667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bajpai PK, Singh I, Madaan J (2014) Development and characterization of PLA-based green composites: a review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 27:52–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bledzki A, Mamun A, Faruk O (2007) Abaca fibre reinforced PP composites and comparison with jute and flax fibre PP composites. Express Polym Lett 1:755–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borck R (2019) Public transport and urban pollution. Reg Sci Urban Econ 77:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlke B, Larbig H, Scherzer H, Poltrock R (1998) Natural fiber reinforced foams based on renewable resources for automotive interior applications. J Cell Plast 34:361–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DE Leon AC, Chen Q, Palaganas NB, Palaganas JO, Manapat J, Advincula RC (2016) High performance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications. React Funct Polym 103:141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferreira FV, Pinheiro IF, DE Souza SF, Mei LH, Lona LM (2019) Polymer composites reinforced with natural fibers and nanocellulose in the automotive industry: a short review. J Compos Sci 3:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrero E, Alessandrini S, Balanzino A (2016) Impact of the electric vehicles on the air pollution from a highway. Appl Energy 169:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedrich K, Almajid AA (2013) Manufacturing aspects of advanced polymer composites for automotive applications. Appl Compos Mater 20:107–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gatlin MD, Barrows FT, Brown P, Dabrowski K, Gaylord TG, Hardy RW, Herman E, Hu G, Krogdahl Å, Nelson R (2007) Expanding the utilization of sustainable plant products in aquafeeds: a review. Aquac Res 38:551–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gesing A (2004) Assuring the continued recycling of light metals in end-of-life vehicles: a global perspective. JOM 56:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghassemieh E (2011) New trends and developments in automotive industry, vol 2. InTech, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Goede M, Stehlin M, Rafflenbeul L, Kopp G, Beeh E (2009) Super light car—lightweight construction thanks to a multi-material design and function integration. Eur Transp Res Rev 1:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heavenrich RM (2006) Light-duty automotive technology and fuel economy trends: 1975 through 2006, CiteseerGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill K, Swiecki B, Cregger J (2012) The bio-based materials automotive value chain. Center for Automotive Research, Michigan 112Google Scholar
  19. Jamshaid H, Mishra R (2016) A green material from rock: basalt fiber–a review. J Text Inst 107:923–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kandachar P, Brouwer R (2001) Applications of bio-composites in industrial products MRS Online Proceedings Library Archive, 702Google Scholar
  21. Konz RJ (2009) The end-of-life vehicle (ELV) directive: the road to responsible disposal. Minn J Int Law 18:431Google Scholar
  22. Koronis G, Silva A, Fontul M (2013a, 2013) Corrigendum to “green composites: a review of adequate materials for automotive applications”. Compos Part B 44:120–127 391Google Scholar
  23. Koronis G, Silva A, Fontul M (2013b) Green composites: a review of adequate materials for automotive applications. Compos Part B 44:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar V, Sutherland JW (2008) Sustainability of the automotive recycling infrastructure: review of current research and identification of future challenges. Int J Sustain Manuf 1:145–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. LA Mantia F, Morreale M (2011) Green composites: a brief review. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 42:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyu M-Y, Choi TG (2015) Research trends in polymer materials for use in lightweight vehicles. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 16:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magurno A (1999) Vegetable fibres in automotive interior components. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 272:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maxton GP, Wormald J (2004) Time for a model change: re-engineering the global automotive industry. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller L, Soulliere K, Sawyer-Beaulieu S, Tseng S, Tam E (2014) Challenges and alternatives to plastics recycling in the automotive sector. Materials 7:5883–5902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Misra M, Drzal LT (2005) Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites. Taylor & Francis, Milton ParkGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal L (2002) Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. J Polym Environ 10:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montag J (2015) The simple economics of motor vehicle pollution: a case for fuel tax. Energy Policy 85:138–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmgren F, Berkowicz R, Ziv A, Hertel O (1999) Actual car fleet emissions estimated from urban air quality measurements and street pollution models. Sci Total Environ 235:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pervaiz M, Panthapulakkal S, Birat K, Sain M, Tjong J (2016) Emerging trends in automotive lightweighting through novel composite materials. Mater Sci Appl 7:26Google Scholar
  35. Rezaei F, Yunus R, Ibrahim N, Mahdi E (2008) Development of short-carbon-fiber-reinforced polypropylene composite for car bonnet. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 47:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robertson ML, Chang K, Gramlich WM, Hillmyer MA (2010) Toughening of polylactide with polymerized soybean oil. Macromolecules 43:1807–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh S, Mohanty AK, Sugie T, Takai Y, Hamada H (2008) Renewable resource based biocomposites from natural fiber and polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate (PHBV) bioplastic. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 39:875–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Song C, Ma C, Zhang Y, Wang T, Wu L, Wang P, Liu Y, Li Q, Zhang J, Dai Q, Zou C, Sun L, Mao H (2018) Heavy-duty diesel vehicles dominate vehicle emissions in a tunnel study in northern China. Sci Total Environ 637-638:431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart R (2010) Automotive composites offer lighter solutions. Reinf Plast 54:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sutherland JW, Adler DP, Haapala KR, Kumar V (2008) A comparison of manufacturing and remanufacturing energy intensities with application to diesel engine production. CIRP Ann 57:5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takayama T, Komabayasi K, Itou M, Miyake Y (2009) Development of bio-based plastics for injection molding. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 2:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Takeshita T (2012) Assessing the co-benefits of CO2 mitigation on air pollutants emissions from road vehicles. Appl Energy 97:225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Raghavan P, Kessler MR (2014) Progress in green polymer composites from lignin for multifunctional applications: a review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:1072–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Todor M-P, Kiss I (2016) Systematic approach on materials selection in the automotive industry for making vehicles lighter, safer and more fuel–efficient. Appl Eng Lett 1:91–97Google Scholar
  45. Xing Q, Ruch D, Dubois P, Wu L, Wang W-J (2017) Biodegradable and high-performance poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)–lignin UV-blocking films. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:10342–10351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang Y, Evans JR (2012) Approaches to the manufacture of layered nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 258:2098–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zini E, Scandola M (2011) Green composites: an overview. Polym Compos 32:1905–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainable Process Engineering, School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built EnvironmentUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringOlabisi Onabanjo UniversityAgo-IwoyeNigeria

Personalised recommendations