Advertisement

Phosphorus removal from livestock effluents: recent technologies and new perspectives on low-cost strategies

  • Sara Zangarini
  • Tommy Pepè SciarriaEmail author
  • Fulvia Tambone
  • Fabrizio Adani
Review Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Phosphorus is an essential element in the food production chain, even though it is a non-renewable and limited natural resource, which is going to run out soon. However, it is also a pollutant if massively introduced into soil and water ecosystems. This study focuses on the current alternative low-cost technologies for phosphorus recovery from livestock effluents. Recovering phosphorus from these wastewaters is considered a big challenge due to the high phosphorus concentration (between 478 and 1756 mg L−1) and solids content (> 2–6% of total solids). In particular, the methods discussed in this study are (i) magnesium-based crystallization (struvite synthesis), (ii) calcium-based crystallization, (iii) electrocoagulation and (iv) biochar production, which differ among them for some advantages and disadvantages. According to the data collected, struvite crystallization achieves the highest phosphorus removal (> 95%), even when combined with the use of seawater bittern (a by-product of sea salt processing) instead of magnesium chloride pure salt as the magnesium source. Moreover, the crystallizer technology used for struvite precipitation has already been tested in wastewater treatment plants, and data reported in this review showed the feasibility of this technology for use with high total solids (> 5%) livestock manure. Furthermore, economic and energetic analyses here reported show that struvite crystallization is the most practicable among the low-cost phosphorus recovery technologies for treating livestock effluents.

Keywords

Phosphorous recovery Struvite Livestock treatment By-product reuse 

Abbreviations

CEC

cation exchange capacity

EC

electrocoagulation

HRT

heated retention time

MAP

magnesium ammonium phosphate

MTD

minimum theoretical equivalent diameter

SWB

seawater bittern

UWWTD

Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive

Notes

Funding information

This project was supported by “Systemic large scale eco-innovation to advance circular economy and mineral recovery from organic waste in Europe (SYSTEMIC)” project number: 730400-2, funded by EU within H2020 Call: H2020-IND-CE-2016-17 (Industry 2020 in the Circular Economy).

References

  1. Angst TE, Sohi SP (2013) Establishing release dynamics for plant nutrients from biochar. GCB Bioenergy 5:221–226.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashley K, Cordell D, Mavinic D (2011) A brief history of phosphorus: from the philosopher’s stone to nutrient recovery and reuse. Chemosphere 84:737–746.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attour A, Touati M, Tlili M, Ben Amor M, Lapicque F, Leclerc JP (2014) Influence of operating parameters on phosphate removal from water by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes. Sep Purif Technol 123:124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.12.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azam HM, Alam ST, Hasan M, Yameogo DDS, Kannan AD, Rahman A, Kwon MJ (2019) Phosphorous in the environment: characteristics with distribution and effects, removal mechanisms, treatment technologies, and factors affecting recovery as minerals in natural and engineered systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:20183–20207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04732-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azuara M, Kersten SRA, Kootstra AMJ (2013) Recycling phosphorus by fast pyrolysis of pig manure: concentration and extraction of phosphorus combined with formation of value-added pyrolysis products. Biomass Bioenergy 49:171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bedussi F, Zaccheo P, Crippa L (2015) Pattern of pore water nutrients in planted and non-planted soilless substrates as affected by the addition of biochars from wood gasification. Biol Fertil Soils 51:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergmans B (2011) Struvite recovery from digested sludge at WWTP West. In: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Vol. master of science. Delft University of Technology, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouamra F, Drouiche N, Ahmed DS, Lounici H (2012) Treatment of water loaded with orthophosphate by electrocoagulation. Procedia Eng 33:155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao L, Wang J, Xiang S, Huang Z, Ruan R, Liu Y (2019) Nutrient removal from digested swine wastewater by combining ammonia stripping with struvite precipitation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:6725–6734.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04153-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cayuela ML, Oenema O, Kuikman PJ, Bakker RR, Van Groenigen JW (2010) Bioenergy by-products as soil amendments? Implications for carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions. GCB Bioenergy 2:201–213.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01055.x
  11. Cerrillo M, Palatsi J, Comas J, Vicens J, Bonmatí A (2015) Struvite precipitation as a technology to be integrated in a manure anaerobic digestion treatment plant – removal efficiency, crystal characterization and agricultural assessment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 90:1135–1143.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chavan RB, Arega Y (2018) Advance research in textile engineering electrocoagulation followed by ion exchange or membrane separation techniques for recycle of textile wastewater. Adv Res Text Eng 3:1024Google Scholar
  13. Cieślik B, Konieczka P (2017) A review of phosphorus recovery methods at various steps of wastewater treatment and sewage sludge management. The concept of “no solid waste generation” and analytical methods. J Clean Prod 142:1728–1740.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cordell D, Rosemarin A, Schröder JJ, Smit AL (2011) Towards global phosphorus security: a systems framework for phosphorus recovery and reuse options. Chemosphere 84:747–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Council of the European Communities (1991) Directive concerning the collection, treatment and discharge of urban wastewater and the discharge of wastewater from certain industrial sectors (91/271/EEC). Off J Eur Communities Ser L 135–140Google Scholar
  16. Crutchik D, Rodrigues S, Ruddle D, Garrido JM (2018) Evaluation of a low-cost magnesium product for phosphorus recovery by struvite crystallization. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 93:1012–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daneshgar S, Callegari A, Capodaglio AG, Vaccari D (2018) The potential phosphorus crisis: resource conservation and possible escape technologies: a review. Resources 7:37.  https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7020037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2004) Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997-2003). Water Res 38:4222–4246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Desmidt E, Ghyselbrecht K, Zhang Y, Pinoy L, Van Der Bruggen B, Verstraete W, Rabaey K, Meesschaert B (2015) Global phosphorus scarcity and full-scale P-recovery techniques: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45:336–384.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.866531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Egle L, Rechberger H, Krampe J, Zessner M (2016) Phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater: an integrated comparative technological, environmental and economic assessment of P recovery technologies. Sci Total Environ 571:522–542.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Etter B, Tilley E, Khadka R, Udert KM (2011) Low-cost struvite production using source-separated urine in Nepal. Water Res 45:852–862.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eurostat - Statistic explained, n.d. No title [WWW document]. URL https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Main_Page
  23. FAO (2017) World fertilizer trends and outlook to 2018. Food Agric Organ United Nations 66Google Scholar
  24. Fleming R, Ford M (2004) Human versus animals - comparison of waste properties. Beef 8–11.Available at https://www.gov.on.ca/OMAFRA/english/crops/field/news/croptalk/ 2001/ct_1101a9.Htm. Accessed 14 December 2004Google Scholar
  25. Foereid B (2015) Biochar in nutrient recycling—the effect and its use in wastewater treatment. Open J Soil Sci 5:39–44.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2015.52004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fukumoto Y, Suzuki K, Kuroda K, Waki M, Yasuda T (2011) Effects of struvite formation and nitratation promotion on nitrogenous emissions such as NH3, N2O and NO during swine manure composting. Bioresour Technol 102:1468–1474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ghosh S, Lobanov S, Lo VK (2019) An overview of technologies to recover phosphorus as struvite from wastewater: advantages and shortcomings. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:19063–19077.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05378-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guadie A, Xia S, Zhang Z, Guo W, Ngo HH, Hermanowicz SW (2013) Simultaneous removal of phosphorus and nitrogen from sewage using a novel combo system of fluidized bed reactor-membrane bioreactor (FBR-MBR). Bioresour Technol 149:276–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guedes P, Couto N, Ottosen LM, Ribeiro AB (2014) Phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge ash through an electrodialytic process. Waste Manag 34:886–892.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hakizimana JN, Gourich B, Chafi M, Stiriba Y, Vial C, Drogui P, Naja J (2017) Electrocoagulation process in water treatment: a review of electrocoagulation modeling approaches. Desalination 404:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Havukainen J, Nguyen MT, Hermann L, Horttanainen M, Mikkilä M, Deviatkin I, Linnanen L (2016) Potential of phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge and manure ash by thermochemical treatment. Waste Manag 49:221–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. He S, Zhang Y, Yang M, Du W, Harada H (2007) Repeated use of MAP decomposition residues for the removal of high ammonium concentration from landfill leachate. Chemosphere 66:2233–2238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hernandez JA, Schmitt MA(2012) Manure management in Minnesota, Publ. WW- 03553. Rev.Google Scholar
  34. Huang H, Xu C, Zhang W (2011a) Removal of nutrients from piggery wastewater using struvite precipitation and pyrogenation technology. Bioresour Technol 102:2523–2528.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huang H, Song Q, Wang W, Wu S, Dai J (2012) Treatment of anaerobic digester effluents of nylon wastewater through chemical precipitation and a sequencing batch reactor process. J Environ Manag 101:68–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hu B (2016) Recovery of phosphorus and fine particles as fertilizer from swine manure by electrocoagulation. Res Report Environ:1–24Google Scholar
  37. Hutnan M, Drtil M, Kalina A (2006) Anaerobic stabilisation of sludge produced during municipal wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater 131:163–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.09.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. IFA (2014) Fertilizer Outlook 2014-2018. 82nd IFA Annu. Conf Sydney:1–7Google Scholar
  39. Inan H, Alaydın E (2014) Phosphate and nitrogen removal by iron produced in electrocoagulation reactor. Desalin Water Treat 52:1396–1403.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.787950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jadhav DA, Ghosh Ray S, Ghangrekar MM (2017) Third generation in bio-electrochemical system research – a systematic review on mechanisms for recovery of valuable by-products from wastewater. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:1022–1031.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jaffer Y, Clark TA, Pearce P, Parsons SA (2002) Potential phosphorus recovery by struvite formation. Water Res 36:1834–1842.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00391-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnston AE, Richards IR (2003) Effectiveness of different precipitated phosphates as phosphorus sources for plants. Soil Use Manag 19:45–49.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2003.tb00278.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jordaan EM, Ackerman J, Cicek N (2009) Nutrient management in wastewater treatment processes1033–1042. Krakow, s.nGoogle Scholar
  44. Kataki S, West H, Clarke M, Baruah DC (2016a) Phosphorus recovery as struvite from farm, municipal and industrial waste: feedstock suitability, methods and pre-treatments. Waste Manag 49:437–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kataki S, West H, Clarke M, Baruah DC (2016b) Phosphorus recovery as struvite: recent concerns for use of seed, alternative mg source, nitrogen conservation and fertilizer potential. Resour Conserv Recycl 107:142–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kiran YK, Barkat A, Cui X-Q, Feng Y, Pan FS, Tang L, Yang XE (2017) Cow manure and cow manure-derived biochar application as a soil amendment for reducing cadmium availability and accumulation by Brassica chinensis L. in acidic red soil. J Integr Agric 16:725–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61488-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kumashiro K, Ishiwatari H, Nawamura Y, (2001) A pilot plant study on using seawater as a magnesium source for struvite precipitation, In: Second International Conference about P-Recovery–submittedGoogle Scholar
  48. Le Corre KS, Valsami-Jones E, Hobbs P, Parsons SA (2009) Phosphorus recovery from wastewater by struvite crystallization: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:433–477.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380701640573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee SI, Weon SY, Lee CW, Koopman B (2003) Removal of nitrogen and phosphate from wastewater by addition of bittern. Chemosphere 51:265–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00807-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lehmann J (2009) Biological carbon sequestration must and can be a win-win approach. Clim Chang 97:459–463.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9695-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Li B, Boiarkina I, Yu W, Huang HM, Munir T, Wang GQ, Young BR (2019) Phosphorous recovery through struvite crystallization: challenges for future design. Sci Total Environ 648:1244–1256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu Z, Singer S, Tong Y, Kimbell L, Anderson E, Hughes M, Zitomer D, McNamara P (2018) Characteristics and applications of biochars derived from wastewater solids. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:650–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lǚ J, Liu H, Liu R, Zhao X, Sun L, Qu J (2013) Adsorptive removal of phosphate by a nanostructured Fe-Al-Mn trimetal oxide adsorbent. Powder Technol 233:146–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Makara A, Kowalski Z (2015) Pig manure treatment and purification by filtration. J Environ Manag 161:317–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marchi A, Geerts S, Weemaes M, Wim S, Christine V (2015) Full-scale phosphorus recovery from digested waste water sludge in Belgium - part I: technical achievements and challenges. Water Sci Technol 71:487–494.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Masebinu SO, Akinlabi ET, Muzenda E, Aboyade AO (2019) A review of biochar properties and their roles in mitigating challenges with anaerobic digestion. Renew Sust Energ Rev 103:291–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Matsumiya Y, Yamasita T, Nawamura Y (2000) Phosphorus removal from sidestreams by crystallisation of magnesium-ammonium-phosphate using seawater. Water Environ J 14:291–296.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2000.tb00263.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2018) Global anthropogenic phosphorus loads to freshwater and associated grey water footprints and water pollution levels: a high-resolution global study. Water Resour Res 54:345–358.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Merino-Jimenez I, Celorrio V, Fermin DJ, Greenman J, Ieropoulos I (2017) Enhanced MFC power production and struvite recovery by the addition of sea salts to urine. Water Res 109:46–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mores R, Treichel H, Zakrzevski CA, Kunz A, Steffens J, Dallago RM (2016) Remove of phosphorous and turbidity of swine wastewater using electrocoagulation under continuous flow. Sep PurifTechnol 171:112–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Münch EV, Barr K, (2001) Controlled struvite crystallisation for removing phosphorus from anaerobic digester sidestreams. Water Res 35:151–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00236-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nghiem LD, Koch K, Bolzonella D, Drewes JE (2017) Full scale co-digestion of wastewater sludge and food waste: bottlenecks and possibilities. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:354–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nguyen D-D, Kim S-D, Yoon Y-S (2014) Enhanced phosphorus and COD removals for retrofit of existing sewage treatment by electrocoagulation process with cylindrical aluminum electrodes. Desalin Water Treat 52:2388–2399.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.794707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Omwene PI, Kobya M, Can OT (2018) Phosphorus removal from domestic wastewater in electrocoagulation reactor using aluminium and iron plate hybrid anodes. Ecol Eng 123:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Parliament EU (2012) REGULATION (EU) No 259/2012. Off J Eur Union 94:16–21Google Scholar
  66. Pepè Sciarria T, Vacca G, Tambone F, Trombino L, Adani F (2019) Nutrient recovery and energy production from digestate using microbial electrochemical technologies (METs). J Clean Prod 208:1022–1029.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.10.152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Quist-Jensen CA, Jørgensen MK, Christensen ML (2016) Treated seawater as a magnesium source for phosphorous recovery from wastewater—a feasibility and cost analysis. Membranes 6:54.  https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6040054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rahaman MS, Mavinic DS, Meikleham A, Ellis N (2014) Modeling phosphorus removal and recovery from anaerobic digester supernatant through struvite crystallization in a fluidized bed reactor. Water Res 51:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rittmann BE, Mayer B, Westerhoff P, Edwards M (2011) Capturing the lost phosphorus. Chemosphere 84:846–853.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schoumans OF, Nelemans JA, Tintelen W, Van Rulkens WH, Oenema O (2014) Explorative study of phosphorus recovery from pig slurry. Wageningen : Alterra, Wageningen-UR (Alterra report 2514) - 46Google Scholar
  71. Schoumans OF, Ehlert PAI, Regelink IC, Nelemans JA, Noij IGAM, Van Tintelen W, Rulkens WH (2017) Chemical phosphorus recovery from animal manure and digestate. Wageningen Environmental Research (Wageningen Environmental Research rapport 2849)Google Scholar
  72. Seitzinger SP, MayorgaE BAF, Kroeze C, Beusen AHW, Billen G, Van Drecht G, Dumont E, Fekete BM, Garnier J, Harrison JA (2010) Global river nutrient export: a scenario analysis of past and future trends. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 24:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shih K, Yan H (2016) Chapter 26 - the crystallization of struvite and its analog (k-struvite) from waste streams for nutrient recycling, in: Prasad MNV, Shih K Environmental materials and waste, resource recovery and pollution prevention academic press 665–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803837-6.00026-3 Google Scholar
  74. Shin HS, Lee SM (1998) Removal of nutrients in wastewater by using magnesium salts. Environ Technol 19:283–290.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331908616682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smit AL, van Middelkoop JC, van Dijk W, van Reuler H (2015) A substance flow analysis of phosphorus in the food production, processing and consumption system of the Netherlands. Nutr. Cycl Agroecosystems 103:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9709-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Soare A, Lakerveld R, van Royen J, Zocchi G, Stankiewicz AI, Kramer HJM (2012) Minimization of attrition and breakage in an airlift crystallizer. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:10895–10909.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300432w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sørensen BL, Dall OL, Habib K (2015) Environmental and resource implications of phosphorus recovery from waste activated sludge. Waste Manag 45:391–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Spokas KA, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production 3: 179–193Google Scholar
  79. Stafford B, Dotro G, Vale P, Jefferson B, Jarvis P (2014) Removal of phosphorus from trickling filter effluent by electrocoagulation. Environ Technol 35:3139–3146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.932440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Steinbeiss S, Gleixner G, Antonietti M (2009) Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1301–1310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stolzenburg P, Capdevielle A, Teychené S, Biscans B (2014) Struvite precipitation with MgO as a precursor: application to wastewater treatment. Chem Eng Sci 133:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stratful I, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN (2004) Removal of struvite to prevent problems associated with its accumulation in wastewater treatment works. Water Environ Res 76:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stumpf D, Zhu H, Heinzmann B, Kraume M (2008) Phosphorus recovery in aerated systems by MAP precipitation: optimizing operational conditions. Water Sci Technol 58:1977–1983.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Symonds EM, Cook MM, McQuaig SM, Ulrich RM, Schenck RO, Lukasik JO, Van Vleet ES, Breitbart M (2015) Reduction of nutrients, microbes, and personal care products in domestic wastewater by a benchtop electrocoagulation unit. Sci Rep 5:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Szögi AA, Vanotti MB, Hunt PG (2015) Phosphorus recovery from pig manure solids prior to land application. J Environ Manag 157:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Szogi AA, Vanotti MB, Ro KS (2015) Methods for treatment of animal manures to reduce nutrient pollution prior to soil application. Curr Pollut Reports 1:47–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-015-0005-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tambone F, Orzi V, D’Imporzano G, Adani F (2017) Solid and liquid fractionation of digestate: mass balance, chemical characterization, and agronomic and environmental value. Bioresour Technol 243:1251–1256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tarragó E, Puig S, Ruscalleda M, Balaguer MD, Colprim J (2016) Controlling struvite particles’ size using the up-flow velocity. Chem Eng J 302:819–827.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tarragó E, Pepè Sciarria T., Ruscalleda M, Colprim J, Balaguer MD, Adani F, Puig S, (2018) Effect of suspended solids and its role on struvite formation from digested manure. J Chem Technol Biotechnol93: 2758–2765  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. U.S. Geological Survey, n.d. USGS mineral commodities summary, http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/phosphate_rock/[WWWdocument]Google Scholar
  91. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, P.D., 2019. No title [WWW document]. URL https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/Google Scholar
  92. Uysal A, Yilmazel YD, Demirer GN (2010) The determination of fertilizer quality of the formed struvite from effluent of a sewage sludge anaerobic digester. J Hazard Mater 181:248–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vaccari D, Daneshgar S, Callegari A, Capodaglio AG (2018) The potential phosphorus crisis: resource conservation and possible escape technologies: a review. Resources 7:37.  https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7020037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vanotti M, Szogi A (2009) Technology for recovery of phosphorus from animal wastewater through calcium phosphate precipitation. Proc Int Conf Nutr Recover from Wastewater Syst:459–468Google Scholar
  95. Vanotti MB, Szogi AA, Hunt PG (2003) Extraction of soluble phosphorus from swine wastewater. Am Soc Agric Eng 46:1665–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang X, Selvam A, Chan M, Wong JWC (2013) Nitrogen conservation and acidity control during food wastes composting through struvite formation. Bioresour Technol 147:17–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wang Z, Zhang J, Guan X, She L, Xiang P, Xia S, Zhang Z (2019) Bioelectrochemical acidolysis of magnesia to induce struvite crystallization for recovering phosphorus from aqueous solution. J Environ Sci 85:119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wilsenach JA, Schuurbiers CAH, van Loosdrecht MCM (2007) Phosphate and potassium recovery from source separated urine through struvite precipitation. Water Res 41:458–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yetilmezsoy K, Ilhan F, Kocak E, Akbin HM (2017) Feasibility of struvite recovery process for fertilizer industry: a study of financial and economic analysis. J Clean Prod 152:88–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhang X, Lin H, Hu B (2016) Phosphorus removal and recovery from dairy manure by electrocoagulation. RSC Adv 6:57960–57968.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA06568F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zhang X, Lin H, Hu B (2018) The effects of electrocoagulation on phosphorus removal and particle settling capability in swine manure. Sep Purif Technol 200:112–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zhang Z, She L, Zhang J, Wang Z, Xiang P, Xia S (2019) Electrochemical acidolysis of magnesite to induce struvite crystallization for recovering phosphorus from aqueous solution. Chemosphere. 226:307–315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gruppo Ricicla, Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e AmbientaliUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations