Advertisement

The effects of deforestation and urbanization on sustainable growth in Asian countries

  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effects of deforestation, economic growth, and urbanization on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions levels in the South and Southeast Asian (SSEA) regions for the 1990–2014 period. The data was divided into five sub-panels. Three of them are income-based groups (namely low-, middle- and high-income panels), and the remaining two are South and Southeast Asian regions. The Pedroni cointegration test confirms a long-run relationship between deforestation, economic growth, urbanization, and CO2 emissions in the SSEA regions. Further, empirical results reveal the existence of a U-shaped relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth for all panels (excepting low-income countries). This means that these countries can grow in a sustainable path, but they must be aware of long-term risks of this economic growth, as this sustainable path could be compromised when reaching the turning point of the “U”. Moreover, our results suggest that deforestation and urbanization can aggravate environmental pollution in these regions and can further affect sustainable development in the long run. Besides, the most appropriate and cost-effective method to minimize CO2 emissions is found to be through the improvement of forest activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Maldives, Iran, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka

  2. 2.

    Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar, Laos, and Brunei Darussalam

  3. 3.

    Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Maldives, Iran, Bhutan and Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar, Laos, and Brunei Darussalam

  4. 4.

    Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Nepal, Laos, and Cambodia

  5. 5.

    India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Bhutan, Vietnam, and Philippines

  6. 6.

    Malaysia, Thailand, Brunei Darussalam, Iran, and Maldives

References

  1. Abdallh AA, Abugamos H (2017) A semi-parametric panel data analysis on the urbanisation-carbon emissions nexus for the MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 78:1350–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.006

  2. Adu DT, Denkyirah EK (2018) Economic growth and environmental pollution in West Africa: testing the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Kasetsart J Soc Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.008

  3. Ahmed K, Shahbaz M, Qasim A, Long W (2015) The linkages between deforestation, energy and growth for environmental degradation in Pakistan. Ecol Indic 49:95–103

  4. Ahmed K, Rehman MU, Ozturk I (2017) What drives carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run? Evidence from selected South Asian countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1142–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.018

  5. Alam MM, Murad MW, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic Navig Urban Complex 70:466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043

  6. Ali HS, Abdul-Rahim AS, Ribadu MB (2017) Urbanization and carbon dioxide emissions in Singapore: evidence from the ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:1967–1974

  7. Al-mulali U, Binti Che Sab CN, Fereidouni HG (2012) Exploring the bi-directional long run relationship between urbanization, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emission. Energy 46:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.043

  8. Al-mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JYM, Sab CNBC (2013) Exploring the relationship between urbanization, energy consumption, and CO2 emission in MENA countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 23:107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.041

  9. Al-mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Mohammed AH (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029

  10. Al-Mulali U, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016) Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Nat Hazards 80:1729–1747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2050-x

  11. Alvarez-Herranz A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Cantos JM (2017) Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 105:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.009

  12. Amri F (2018) Carbon dioxide emissions, total factor productivity, ICT, trade, financial development, and energy consumption: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:33691–33701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3331-1

  13. Andrée BPJ, Chamorro A, Spencer P, Koomen E, Dogo H (2019) Revisiting the relation between economic growth and the environment; a global assessment of deforestation, pollution and carbon emission. Renew Sust Energ Rev 114:109221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.028

  14. Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: an ethical dilemma. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:808–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.105

  15. Apergis N (2016) Environmental Kuznets curves: new evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions. Energy Econ 54:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.12.007

  16. Awan U, Abbasi AS, Humayon AA (2014) The concept of civic sustainability is need of hour. Res J Environ Earth Sci 6:347–352

  17. Awan U, Kraslawski A, Huiskonen J (2018) Governing Interfirm relationships for social sustainability: the relationship between governance mechanisms, sustainable collaboration, and cultural intelligence. Sustainability 10:4473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124473

  18. Begum RA, Sohag K, Abdullah SMS, Jaafar M (2015) CO 2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.205

  19. Behera SR, Dash DP (2017) The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct investment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (south and southeast Asian) region. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.201

  20. Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.031

  21. Berry, Lobley BJ (1973) Comparative urbanization: divergent paths in the twentieth century. Macmillan Publishers Limited

  22. Chandran VGR, Tang CF (2013) The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.054

  23. Chaolin G, Liya W, Cook I (2012) Progress in research on Chinese urbanization. Front Archit Res 1:101–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2012.02.013

  24. Chikaraishi M, Fujiwara A, Kaneko S, Poumanyvong P, Komatsu S, Kalugin A (2015) The moderating effects of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions: a latent class modeling approach. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 90:302–317

  25. Christopoulou O, Polyzos S, Minetos D (2007)Peri-urban and urban forests in Greece: obstacle or advantage to urban development? Manag Environ Qual 18:382–395

  26. Ciesielski M, Stereńczak K (2018) What do we expect from forests? The European view of public demands. J Environ Manag 209:139–151

  27. Coletta V, Lombardi F, Altieri V, Bombino G, Marcianò C, Menguzzato G, Marziliano PA (2016) Environmental resources conservation through sustainable forest management. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 223:758–763

  28. de Bruyn SM, van den Bergh JCJM, Opschoor JB (1998) Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol Econ 25:161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00178-X

  29. De Chant T, Gallego AH, Saornil JV, Kelly M (2010) Urban influence on changes in linear forest edge structure. Landsc Urban Plan 96:12–18

  30. De Sy V, Herold M, Achard F, Beuchle R, Clevers J, Lindquist E, Verchot L (2015) Land use patterns and related carbon losses following deforestation in South America. Environ Res Lett 10:124004

  31. DeFries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M (2010) Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci 3:178–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo756

  32. Delphin S, Escobedo FJ, Abd-Elrahman A, Cropper WP (2016) Urbanization as a land use change driver of forest ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 54:188–199

  33. Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49:431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011

  34. Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460

  35. Ekins P (1997) The Kuznets curve for the environment and economic growth: examining the evidence. Environ Plan A 29:805–830. https://doi.org/10.1068/a290805

  36. FAO (2015) How are the world’s forests changing? UNITED NATION

  37. Glaeser EL, Kahn ME (2010) The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J Urban Econ 67:404–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.11.006

  38. Gokmenoglu KK, Olasehinde-Williams GO, Taspinar N (2019) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of deforestation. In: Energy and environmental strategies in the era of globalization. Springer, pp 61–83

  39. Gołos P (2013) Selected aspects of the forest recreational function in view of its users. For Res Pap 74:257–272. https://doi.org/10.2478/frp-2013-0025

  40. Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica J Econ Soc 424–438

  41. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a north American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research

  42. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377

  43. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

  44. He Z, Xu S, Shen W, Long R, Chen H (2017) Impact of urbanization on energy related CO 2 emission at different development levels: regional difference in China based on panel estimation. J Clean Prod 140:1719–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.155

  45. Heidari H, Turan Katircioğlu S, Saeidpour L (2015) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:785–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.07.081

  46. Heil MT, Selden TM (2001) Carbon emissions and economic development: future trajectories based on historical experience. Environ Dev Econ 6:63–83

  47. Hewson J, Razafimanahaka JH, Wright TM, Mandimbiniaina R, Mulligan M, Jones JP, Van Soesbergen A, Andriamananjara A, Tabor K, Rasolohery A (2019) Land change modelling to inform strategic decisions on Forest cover and CO 2 emissions in eastern Madagascar. Environ Conserv 46:25–33

  48. Hui C, Wong A, Tjosvold D (2007) Turnover intention and performance in China: the role of positive affectivity, Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy. J Occup Organ Psychol 80:735–751

  49. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018) ReportWorking group 1 report, 2018. IPCC

  50. Kishor N, Belle A (2004) Does improved governance contribute to sustainable forest management? J Sustain For 19:55–79

  51. Koirala BS, Mysami RC (2015) Investigating the effect of forest per capita on explaining the EKC hypothesis for CO2 in the US. J Environ Econ Policy 4:304–314

  52. Koirala BS, Li H, Berrens RP (2011) Further investigation of environmental Kuznets curve studies using meta-analysis. Int J Ecol Econ Stat 22:13–32

  53. Le T-H, Quah E (2018) Income level and the emissions, energy, and growth nexus: evidence from Asia and the Pacific. Int Econ 156:193–205

  54. Lean HH, Smyth R (2010) CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Appl Energy 87:1858–1864

  55. Li K, Lin B (2015) Impacts of urbanization and industrialization on energy consumption/CO 2 emissions: does the level of development matter? Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1107–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.185

  56. Li H, Mu H, Zhang M, Gui S (2012) Analysis of regional difference on impact factors of China’s energy – related CO2 emissions. Energy 39:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.008

  57. Li T, Wang Y, Zhao D (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve in China: new evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy 91:138–147

  58. Liu X, Bae J (2018) Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO2 emissions in China. J Clean Prod 172:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.156

  59. Liu X, Zhang S, Bae J (2017) The impact of renewable energy and agriculture on carbon dioxide emissions: investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in four selected ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 164:1239–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.086

  60. Martínez-Zarzoso I, Maruotti A (2011) The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol Econ 70:1344–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.009

  61. Marziliano PA, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Davies C, Sanesi G (2013) Structural diversity and height growth models in urban forest plantations: a case-study in northern Italy. Urban For Urban Green 12:246–254

  62. Meng L, Crijns-Graus WH, Worrell E, Huang B (2018) Impacts of booming economic growth and urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions in Chinese megalopolises over 1985–2010: an index decomposition analysis. Energy Effic 11:203–223

  63. Mert M, Bölük G (2016) Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:21669–21681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7

  64. Miao L (2017) Examining the impact factors of urban residential energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China–evidence from city-level data. Ecol Indic 73:29–37

  65. Mishra V, Smyth R, Sharma S (2009) The energy-GDP nexus: evidence from a panel of Pacific Island countries. Resour Energy Econ 31:210–220

  66. Moomaw WR, Unruh GC (1997) Are environmental Kuznets curves misleading us? The case of CO 2 emissions. Environ Dev Econ 2:451–463

  67. Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38:661–666

  68. O’Neill RV, Kahn JR, Duncan JR, Elliott S, Efroymson R, Cardwell H, Jones DW (1996) Economic growth and sustainability: a new challenge. Ecol Appl 6:23–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269544

  69. Ota T (2017) Economic growth, income inequality and environment: assessing the applicability of the Kuznets hypotheses to Asia. Palgrave Commun 3:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.69

  70. Ouyang X, Lin B (2017) Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions during urbanization: a comparative study between China and Japan. J Clean Prod 143:356–368

  71. Pacione M (2003)Quality-of-life research in urban geography. Urban Geogr 24:314–339. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.24.4.314

  72. Parajuli R, Joshi O, Maraseni T (2019) Incorporating forests, agriculture, and energy consumption in the framework of the environmental Kuznets Curve: a dynamic panel data approach. Sustainability 11:2688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092688

  73. Pedroni P (2001a) Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev Econ Stat 83:727–731

  74. Pedroni P (2001b) Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 93–130

  75. Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econ Theory 20:597–625

  76. Pesaran MH (1997) The role of economic theory in modelling the long run. Econ J 107:178–191

  77. Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312

  78. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94:621–634

  79. Piussi P, Farrell EP (2000) Interactions between society and forest ecosystems: challenges for the near future. For Ecol Manag 132:21–28

  80. Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ 70:434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.029

  81. Rafiq S, Salim R, Nielsen I (2016) Urbanization, openness, emissions, and energy intensity: a study of increasingly urbanized emerging economies. Energy Econ 56:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.007

  82. Richmond AK, Kaufmann RK (2006) Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions? Ecol Econ 56:176–189

  83. Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emissions on economic growth: fresh evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equations models. Sustain Cities Soc 14:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.05.004

  84. Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 646:862–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365

  85. Sengupta R (1996) CO2 Emission-income relationship: Policy approach for climate control. Pacific Asian J Energy 7:207–229

  86. Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M (2013) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459

  87. Shahbaz M, Dube S, Ozturk I, Jalil A (2015) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Portugal. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5:475–481

  88. Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Muzaffar AT, Ahmed K, Jabran MA (2016) How urbanization affects CO2 emissions in Malaysia? The application of STIRPAT model. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:83–93

  89. Sharma SS (2011) Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 88:376–382

  90. Sheng P, Guo X (2016) The long-run and short-run impacts of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions. Econ Model 53:208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.12.006

  91. Stock, J.H., Watson, M.W., 1993. A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica J Econ Soc 783–820

  92. Uchiyama K (2016) Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. In: Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, in: environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and carbon dioxide emissions. Springer Japan, Tokyo, pp 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55921-4_2

  93. Ünal HE, Birben Ü, Bolat F (2019) Rural population mobility, deforestation, and urbanization: case of Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 191:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7149-6

  94. Urbanet (2018) News and debates on municipal and local government, Sustainable Urban Development Decentralisation

  95. Wang Y, Zhao T (2015) Impacts of energy-related CO2 emissions: evidence from under developed, developing and highly developed regions in China. Ecol Indic 50:186–195

  96. Wang P, Wu W, Zhu B, Wei Y (2013) Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Appl Energy 106:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.036

  97. Wang Y, Chen L, Kubota J (2016) The relationship between urbanization, energy use and carbon emissions: evidence from a panel of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. J Clean Prod 112:1368–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.041

  98. Wang S, Yang F, Wang X, Song J (2017) A microeconomics explanation of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) and an empirical investigation. Pol J Environ Stud 26:1757–1764. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/68567

  99. Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018a) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2144–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.025

  100. Wang S, Zeng J, Huang Y, Shi C, Zhan P (2018b) The effects of urbanization on CO2 emissions in the Pearl River Delta: a comprehensive assessment and panel data analysis. Appl Energy 228:1693–1706

  101. Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748

  102. World Development Indicators (2018) Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/country

  103. World Development Indicators (2019) World Bank

  104. World Energy Outlook (2017) International Energy Agency

  105. Worldometer (2018) Worldometers

  106. Xie Q, Liu J (2019) Combined nonlinear effects of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from a panel data partially linear additive model. Energy 186:115868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115868

  107. Yandle B, Vijayaraghavan M, Bhattarai M (2002) The environmental Kuznets curve. A Primer, PERC Research Study 02–01

  108. Zaman K, Moemen MA (2017) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic development: evaluating alternative and plausible environmental hypothesis for sustainable growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 74:1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.072

  109. Zhang Y-J, Liu Z, Zhang H, Tan T-D(2014) The impact of economic growth, industrial structure and urbanization on carbon emission intensity in China. Nat Hazards 73:579–595

  110. Zhang N, Yu K, Chen Z (2017) How does urbanization affect carbon dioxide emissions? A cross-country panel data analysis. Energy Policy 107:678–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.072

  111. Zhu H-M, You W-H, Zeng Z (2012) Urbanization and CO2 emissions: a semi-parametric panel data analysis. Econ Lett 117:848–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.001

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Zeeshan Arshad.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 1
figure1

Forest area per thousand persons

Table 8 Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix
Table 9 Unit root analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arshad, Z., Robaina, M., Shahbaz, M. et al. The effects of deforestation and urbanization on sustainable growth in Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2020) doi:10.1007/s11356-019-07507-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Deforestation
  • Economic growth
  • Urbanization
  • CO2 emissions
  • Asian countries