Advertisement

Experimental study and dynamic simulation of melanoidin adsorption from distillery effluent

  • Shoaib AhmedEmail author
  • Imran Nazir Unar
  • Hassnain Abas Khan
  • Ghulamullah Maitlo
  • Rasool Bux Mahar
  • Abdul Sattar Jatoi
  • Abdul Qayoom Memon
  • Abdul Karim Shah
Research Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

This work aims to utilize fly ash from a thermal power station for melanoidin reduction from distillery effluent by adsorption. To accomplish this, coal fly ash was modified through chemical treatment and was then tested for melanoidin adsorption as a function of various melanoidin concentrations, contact time, and pH. The specific novelty of this study is the evaluation of coal fly ash as a low-cost adsorbent for melanoidin removal. Furthermore, the simulation study was carried out using Aspen ADSIM software in order to optimize the commercial usage of the prepared adsorbent. The main results achieved include the maximum removal efficiency of 84% which was reached at initial melanoidin concentration of 1100 mg L−1 (5% dilution), pH 6, and a contact time of 120 min. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were used to evaluate adsorption isotherms. The maximum adsorption capacity of 281.34 mg/g was observed using the Langmuir isotherm. Furthermore, pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order and intra-particle diffusion models were used to fit adsorption kinetic data. The pseudo-second-order was best describing the adsorption kinetic with a faster kinetic rate of 0.142 mg g–1 min−1. CFA (coal fly ash) after acidic activation resulted in a slightly higher surface area, average pore volume, and pore size. The maximum breakthrough time and adsorbent saturation time were achieved at initial melanoidin concentration of 1 mol/lit, bed height of 2.5 m, and flow rate of 50 lit/min.

Keywords

Melanoidins Fly ash Adsorption Isotherms Kinetics Aspen Adsim Simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Water (USPCASW), USAID, the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department of the University of Utah, and the Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department of Mehran UET, Jamshoro. Additionally, the authors are also thankful to Dr. Rick Bereit, Professor University of Utah, for editing this paper.

References

  1. An C, Yang S, Huang G, Zhao S, Zhang P, Yao Y (2016) Removal of sulfonated humic acid from aqueous phase by modified coal fly ash waste: equilibrium and kinetic adsorption studies. Fuel 165:264–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anisuzzaman SM, Bono A, Krishnaiah D, Tan YZ (2016) A study on dynamic simulation of phenol adsorption in activated carbon packed bed column. J King Saud Univ - Eng Sci 28:47–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2014.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arica T, Ayas E, Arica Y (2017) Magnetic MCM-41 silica particles grafted with poly(glycidylmethacrylate) brush: modification and application for removal of direct dyes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arica TA, Kuman M, Gercel O, Ayas E (2019) Poly(dopamine) grafted bio-silica composite with tetraethylenepentamine ligands for enhanced adsorption of pollutants. Chem Eng Res Des 141:317–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arimi MM, Zhang Y, Götz G, Kiriamiti K, Geißen S-U (2014) Antimicrobial colorants in molasses distillery wastewater and their removal technologies. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 87:34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arimi MM, Zhang Y, Geißen S-U (2015) Color removal of melanoidin-rich industrial effluent by natural manganese oxides. Sep Purif Technol 150:286–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bada S, Potgieter-Vermaak S (2008) Evaluation and treatment of coal fly ash for adsorption application. Leonardo Electron J Pract Technol 12:37–48Google Scholar
  8. Cao J-S, Lin J-X, Fang F, Zhang M-T, Hu Z-R (2014) A new absorbent by modifying walnut shell for the removal of anionic dye: kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Bioresour Technol 163:199–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandra R, Bharagava RN, Rai V (2008) Melanoidins as major colourant in sugarcane molasses based distillery effluent and its degradation. Bioresour Technol 99:4648–4660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen X (2015) Modeling of experimental adsorption isotherm data information 6:14–22 doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/info6010014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chowdhury S, Das P (2011) Adsorption kinetic modeling of Safranin onto rice husk biomatrix using pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order kinetic models: comparison of linear and non-linear methods. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water 39:274–282.  https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahiya J, Singh D, Nigam P (2001) Decolourisation of synthetic and spentwash melanoidins using the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium JAG-40. Bioresour Technol 78:95–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00119-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolphen R, Thiravetyan P (2011) Adsorption of melanoidins by chitin nanofibers. Chem Eng J 166:890–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elgarahy AM, Elwakeel KZ, Elshoubaky GA, Mohammad SH (2019) Untapped sepia shell–based composite for the sorption of cationic and anionic dyes. Water Air Soil Pollut 230:217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4247-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El-Safty S, Shenashen M, Elshehy E (2014) Monolithic scaffolds for highly selective ion sensing/removal of co(II), cu(II), and cd(II) ions in water analyst. 139 doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/C4AN00980K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elwakeel KZ, El-Bindary AA, Ismail A, Morshidy AM (2016a) Sorptive removal of Remazol Brilliant Blue R from aqueous solution by diethylenetriamine functionalized magnetic macro-reticular hybrid material. RSC Adv 6:22395–22410.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA26508H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elwakeel KZ, El-Kousy S, El-Shorbagy HG, El-Ghaffar MAA (2016b) Comparison between the removal of reactive black 5 from aqueous solutions by 3-amino-1,2,4 triazole,5-thiol and melamine grafted chitosan prepared through four different routes. J Environ Chem Eng 4:733–745.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erto A, Di Natale F, Musmarra D, Lancia A (2015) Modeling of single and competitive adsorption of cadmium and zinc onto activated carbon. Adsorption 21:611–621.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-015-9712-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Figaro S, Avril JP, Brouers F, Ouensanga A, Gaspard S (2009) Adsorption studies of molasse’s wastewaters on activated carbon: modelling with a new fractal kinetic equation and evaluation of kinetic models. J Hazard Mater 161:649–656.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Francisca Kalavathi D, Uma L, Subramanian G (2001) Degradation and metabolization of the pigment—melanoidin in distillery effluent by the marine cyanobacterium Oscillatoria boryana BDU 92181. Enzym Microb Technol 29:246–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00383-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garg VK, Gupta R, Bala Yadav A, Kumar R (2003) Dye removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on treated sawdust. Bioresour Technol 89:121–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00058-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gieré R, Carleton EL, Lumpkin G (2003) Micro- and nanochemistry of fly ash from a coal-fired power plant. Am Mineral 88:1853–1865.  https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2003-11-1228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goscianska J, Marciniak M, Pietrzak R (2016) The effect of surface modification of mesoporous carbons on Auramine-O dye removal from water. Adsorption 22:531–540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-015-9722-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gunay A, Ersoy B, Dikmen S, Evcin A (2013) Investigation of equilibrium, kinetic, thermodynamic and mechanism of Basic Blue 16, adsorption by montmorillonitic clay. Adsorption 19:757–768.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-013-9509-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jahangiri-Rad M, Jamshidi A, Rafiee M, Nabizadeh R (2014) Adsorption performance of packed bed column for nitrate removal using PAN-oxime-nano Fe 2 O 3. J Environ Health Sci Eng 12:90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaushik A, Basu S, Singh K, Batra VS, Balakrishnan M (2017) Activated carbon from sugarcane bagasse ash for melanoidins recovery. J Environ Manag 200:29–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kavitha D, Namasivayam C (2007) Experimental and kinetic studies on methylene blue adsorption by coir pith carbon. Bioresour Technol 98:14–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kobya M (2004) Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto hazelnut shell activated carbon: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Bioresour Technol 91:317–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishna Prasad R, Srivastava SN (2009a) Sorption of distillery spent wash onto fly ash: kinetics and mass transfer studies. Chem Eng J 146:90–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krishna Prasad R, Srivastava SN (2009b) Sorption of distillery spent wash onto fly ash: kinetics, mechanism, process design and factorial design. J Hazard Mater 161:1313–1322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liakos TI, Lazaridis NK (2016) Melanoidin removal from molasses effluents by adsorption. J Water Process Eng 10:156–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liang Z, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Liu H (2009) Coagulation removal of melanoidins from biologically treated molasses wastewater using ferric chloride. Chem Eng J 152:88–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.03.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malhotra M, Suresh S, Garg A (2018) Tea waste derived activated carbon for the adsorption of sodium diclofenac from wastewater: adsorbent characteristics, adsorption isotherms, kinetics, and thermodynamics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:32210–32220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3148-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maneerung T, Liew J, Dai Y, Kawi S, Chong C, Wang C-H (2016) Activated carbon derived from carbon residue from biomass gasification and its application for dye adsorption: kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies. Bioresour Technol 200:350–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martins S, Boekel M (2005) A kinetic model for the glucose/glycine Maillard reaction pathway. Food Chem 90:257–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niu Y, Li K, Ying D, Wang Y, Jia J (2017) Novel recyclable adsorbent for the removal of copper(II) and lead(II) from aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol 229:63–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raghukumar C, Mohandass C, Kamat S, Shailaja MS (2004) Simultaneous detoxification and decolorization of molasses spent wash by the immobilized white-rot fungus Flavodon flavus isolated from a marine habitat. Enzym Microb Technol 35:197–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramezani A, Najafpour G, Mohammadi M (2011) Removal of melanoidin from molasses spent wash using fly ash-clay adsorbents. Korean J Chem Eng 28:1035–1041.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0474-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sarbak Z, Kramer-Wachowiak M (2002) Porous structure of waste fly ashes and their chemical modifications. Powder Technol 123:53–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(01)00431-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M (2007) Removal of color from biomethanated distillery spentwash by treatment with activated carbons. Bioresour Technol 98:2629–2635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M (2008) Wastewater treatment in molasses-based alcohol distilleries for COD and color removal: a review. J Environ Manag 86:481–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simaratanamongkol A, Thiravetyan P (2010) Decolorization of melanoidin by activated carbon obtained from bagasse bottom ash. J Food Eng 96:14–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.06.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA, Rouquérol J, Siemieniewska T (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl Chem 57(4):603–619Google Scholar
  44. Singh N, Petrinic I, Hélix-Nielsen C, Basu S, Balakrishnan M (2018) Concentrating molasses distillery wastewater using biomimetic forward osmosis (FO) membranes. Water Res 130:271–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Susree M, Asaithambi P, Saravanathamizhan R, Matheswaran M (2013) Studies on various mode of electrochemical reactor operation for the treatment of distillery effluent. J Environ Chem Eng 1:552–558.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tiwari S, Rai P, Yadav SK, Gaur R (2013) A novel thermotolerant Pediococcus acidilactici B-25 strain for color, COD, and BOD reduction of distillery effluent for end use applications. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:4046–4058.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1339-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valix M, Cheung WH, McKay G (2009) Sulfur fixation on bagasse activated carbon by chemical treatment and its effect on acid dye adsorption. Adsorption 15:453.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-009-9194-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Visa M, Andronic L, Lucaci D, Duta A (2011) Concurrent dyes adsorption and photo-degradation on fly ash based substrates. Adsorption 17:101–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-010-9295-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yu LJ, Shukla SS, Dorris KL, Shukla A, Margrave JL (2003) Adsorption of chromium from aqueous solutions by maple sawdust. J Hazard Mater 100:53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00008-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao S, Yi H, Tang X, Gao F, Wang J, Huang Y, Yang Z (2017) Adsorptive removal of carbonyl sulfide by Fe-modified activated carbon: experiments and DFT calculations. Adsorption.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-017-9910-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shoaib Ahmed
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Imran Nazir Unar
    • 3
  • Hassnain Abas Khan
    • 4
  • Ghulamullah Maitlo
    • 2
  • Rasool Bux Mahar
    • 1
  • Abdul Sattar Jatoi
    • 2
  • Abdul Qayoom Memon
    • 2
  • Abdul Karim Shah
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in WaterMehran University of Engineering and TechnologyJamshoroPakistan
  2. 2.Chemical Engineering DepartmentDawood University of Engineering and TechnologyKarachiPakistan
  3. 3.Chemical Engineering DepartmentMehran University of Engineering and TechnologyJamshoroPakistan
  4. 4.Clean Combustion Research Center, Division of Physical Sciences and EngineeringKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)ThuwalSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations