Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A blessing for the Yangtze River: optimization of Chinese regional policy planning for water yield and purification in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

Land use/land cover (LULC) changes impact the structure and functioning of ecosystems, which consequently influences the provisioning of a range of ecosystem services (ES). There is a growing consensus regarding the merit of integrating the evaluation of ES into regional policy planning. The Yangtze River is the world’s third longest and supports more than 6% of its population. However, assessing the potential impacts of different resource management policies upon ES is complicated in the Yangtze basin. To remedy this, here we designed a scenario analysis-based approach that used remotely sensed data and GIS (geographic information system) to analyze the relationships between ES (i.e., water flow regulation, water purification) and policies envisioned to improve human welfare in the Chongqing municipality, in the upper reaches of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) in the Yangtze basin. This watershed area has high population density and suffers from severe flood hazard and critical pollution issues. The GEOMOD modeling technique was used to predict LULC changes according to policy planning alternatives, producing scenarios by 2050 for the TGRA watershed. The GIS-based ES model (InVEST model) was developed as a tool to inform the decision-making process with the intention of aligning conservation measures with economic development. We examine policy effectiveness by comparing three scenarios for 2050: scenario-1 maintains the current policy, with no considerations of ES; scenario-2 integrates ES into policy planning; and scenario-3 integrates ES into policy planning considering the needs of local people. Our scenario-based LULC change analysis showed that the land with large increases in water flow regulation (i.e., values ≤–3000 × 103 m3 km-2) were scattered over the entire study area, while phosphorus reduction (i.e., values ≤ –30 kg km-2) were located mainly along rivers in all scenarios. Scenario-2 and scenario-3 are based on policies aiming at enhancing ES provisioning; for these, the projected ecological risks of water pollution are significantly reduced (39.97% and 37.58%, respectively). Total net changes of the investigated ES under scenario-2 or scenario-3 were almost double that occurring under scenario-1. Although scenario-2 and scenario-3 showed a near-equal total net change, water purification under scenario-2 was the greatest relative to forest expansion. However, scenario-3 offered the best future environmental development scenario, as it accounted for the demand and supply characteristics of water yield and purification in different regions. The water purification service made the greatest contribution to positive and negative effects (26%–47% and -7%, respectively) on ES provisioning. Linking water purification service to policy planning would effectively improve the overall ES. These scenario forecasting results will help the Three Gorges Dam to gain more ecological benefits via improvements to water flow regulation and the effective alleviation of degraded water quality in heavily populated regions in the Yangtze basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO Press, Rome

  2. Balvanera P, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Ricketts TH, Bailey SA, Kark C, Pereira H (2001) Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Science 291:2047

  3. Borjesson P, Tufvesson LM (2011) Agricultural crop-based biofuels-resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes. J Clean Prod 19:108–120

  4. Budyko MI (1974) Climate and life. Academic Press, San Diego

  5. Chen J, Wu X, Finlayson BL, Webber M, Wei T, Li M, Chen Z (2014) Variability and trend in the hydrology of the Yangtze River, China: annual precipitation and runoff. J Hydrol 513:403–412

  6. Cheng H, Hu Y, Zhao J (2009) Meeting China’s water shortage crisis: current practices and challenges. Environ Sci Technol 43(2):240–244

  7. Chongqing Water Agency (2003) Chongqing water resources bulletin. Chongqing Water Conservancy Information Center (http://www.cqwater.gov.cn/)

  8. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

  9. Daily GC (ed) (1997) Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC

  10. de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272

  11. Eastman JR (2012) IDRISI Selva. Clark University, Worcester

  12. Estoque RC, Murayama YJ (2012) Examining the potential impact of land use/cover changes on the ecosystem services of Baguio city, the Philippines: a scenario-based analysis. Appl Geogr 35(1–2):316–326

  13. Fan J (2014) Influence of MRP and WRP of south-to-north water diversion on water resources in water source areas and countermeasures. Yangtz River 45(7):23–26 (in Chinese)

  14. Gong W, Xu DR, Caine ED (2016) Challenges arising from China's two-child policy. Lancet 387(10025):1274–1274

  15. Grêt-Regamey A, Brunner SH, Kienast F (2012) Mountain ecosystem services: who cares? Mt Res Dev 32(S1):S23–S34

  16. Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1(2):96–99

  17. Hewlett JD (1982) Principles of forest hydrology. University of Georgia Press, Athens

  18. Hunter LM, Manuel DJGG, Stevenson M, Karish KS, Toth R, Edwards TC, Lilieholm RJ, Cablk M (2003) Population and land use change in the California Mojave: natural habitat implications of alternative futures. Popul Res Policy Rev 22(4):373–397

  19. Koop SHA, Koetsier L, Doornhof A, Reinstra O, Leeuwen CJV, Brouwer S, Dieperink C, Driessen PPJ (2017) Assessing the governance capacity of cities to address challenges of water, waste, and climate change. Water Resour Manag 31(11):3427–3443

  20. Lawler JJ, Lewis DJ, Nelson E, Plantinga AJ, Polasky S, Withey JC, Helmers DP, Martinuzzi S, Pennington D, Radeloff VC (2014) Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(20):7492–7497

  21. Leitáo AB, Miller J, Ahern J, McGarigal K (2006) Measuring landscapes. a planner’s handbook. Island Press, Washington, DC

  22. Liu JG, Li SX, Ouyang ZY, Tam C, Chen XD (2008) Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(28):9477–9482

  23. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

  24. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):4–11

  25. Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Xiao Y, Polasky S, Liu JG, Xu WH, Wang Q, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Rao EM, Jiang L, Lu F, Wang XK, Yang GB, Gong SH, Wu BF, Zeng Y, Yang W, Daily GC (2016) Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 352(6292):1455–1459

  26. Paudel S, Yuan F (2012) Assessing landscape changes and dynamics using patch analysis and GIS modeling. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 16:70–76

  27. Poelmans L, Rompaey AV (2009) Detecting and modelling spatial patterns of urban sprawl in highly fragmented areas: a case study in the Flanderse-Brussels region. Landsc Urban Plan 93(1):10–19

  28. Pontius RG, Chen H (2006) GEOMOD modelling. Idrisi 15: the Andes edition. Clark University, Worcester

  29. Pontius RG, Cornell JD, Hall CAS (2001) Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85:191–203

  30. Shen ZY, Qiu JL, Hong Q, Chen L (2014) Simulation of spatial and temporal distributions of non-point source pollution load in the three gorges reservoir region. Sci Total Environ 493(15):138–146

  31. Shi ZH, Ai L, Fang NF, Zhu HD (2012) Modeling the impacts of integrated small watershed management on soil erosion and sediment delivery: a case study in the three gorges area, China. J Hydrol 438–439(7):156–167

  32. Swetnam RD, Fisher B, Mbilinyi BP, Munishi PK, Willcock S, Ricketts T, Mwakalila S, Balmford A, Burgess ND, Marshall AR, Lewis SL (2011) Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. J Environ Manag 92(3):563–574

  33. Tallis HT, Polasky S (2009) Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1162:265–283

  34. Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., Kennedy, C., (2010) InVEST 1.004 beta user’s guide. The natural capital project, Stanford University <http://www.naturalcapital project.org/InVEST.html> (Accessed 05.04.13)

  35. Wang S, Zhang Z (2011) Effects of climate change on water resources in China. Clim Res 47(1):77–82

  36. Xiao Y, Xiao Q (2018) Identifying key areas of ecosystem services potential to improve ecological management in Chongqing City, Southwest China. Environ Monit Assess 190:258

  37. Xiao Y, Xiao Q, Ouyang ZY, Qin M (2015) Assessing changes in water flow regulation in Chongqing region, China. Environ Monit Assess 187(6):1–13

  38. Xiao Y, Ouyang ZY, Xu WH, Xiao Y, Zheng H, Xian CF (2016) Optimizing hotspot areas for ecological planning and management based on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Chin Geogr Sci 26(2):256–269

  39. Xiao Y, Xiong QL, Pan KW (2019) What is left for our next generation? Integrating ecosystem services into regional policy planning in the three gorges reservoir area of China. Sustainability 11:3

  40. Xiong QL, Xiao Y, Shi YJ, Lu YL, Xiao Q, Ouyang ZY (2013) An RRM-based ecological risk evaluation for the Chongqing section of the Yangtze River basin. J Southwest Univ 11(11):141–146 (in Chinese)

  41. Xiong QL, Xiao Y, Ouyang ZY, Pan KW, Zhang L, He XJ, Zheng H, Sun XM, Wu XG, Tariq A, Li LJ (2017) Bright side? The impacts of three gorges reservoir on local ecological service of soil conservation in southwestern China. Environ Earth Sci 76:323

  42. Xiong QL, Xiao Y, Halmy MW, Dakhil MA, Liang PH, Liu CG, Zhang L, Pandey B, Pan KW, Kafraway SB, Chen J (2019) Monitoring the impact of climate change and human activities on grassland vegetation dynamics in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet plateau of China during 2000–2015. J Arid Land 11:637–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-019-0061-2

  43. Xu XB, Tan Y, Yang GS, Li HP, Su WZ (2011) Impacts of China's three gorges dam project on net primary productivity in the reservoir area. Sci Total Environ 409(22):4656–4662

  44. Yu G, Yang Y, Tu Z, Jie Y, Yu Q, Hu X, Yu H, Zhou R, Chen X, Wang H (2016) Modeling the water-satisfied degree for production of the main food crops in China. Sci Total Environ 547:215–225

  45. Zhang QF, Lou ZP (2011) The environmental changes and mitigation actions in the three gorges reservoir region, China. Environ Sci Pol 14:1132–1138

  46. Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37(3):701–708

  47. Zhang Q, Xu C-Y, Becker S, Jiang T (2006) Sediment and runoff changes in the Yangtze river basin during past 50 years. J Hydrol 331(3):511–523

  48. Zhang ZM, Xu WH, Zhou WQ, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Ou XK, Ouyang ZY (2014) Integrating remote sensing with GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation approach for karst rocky desertification assessment in southwest of China. IOP Conf, Series: Earth Environ Sci 18:012038

  49. Zheng H, Robinson BE, Liang Y-C, Polasky S, Ma D-C, Wang F-C, Ruckelshaus M, Ouyang Z-Y, Daily GC (2013) Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(41):16681–16686

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Chenggang Liu for his help during the preparation of the manuscript. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude for the relevant members of the government departments in Chongqing for their support during the data collection. The authors are grateful to editors and anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments and constructive feedback.

Data availability statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Funding

The present study received funding from the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2016YFC0502101), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31700544), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Light of West China Program (Grant No. 2016XBZG_XBQNXZ_B_005), the CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Program (Grant No. kxysws1901), and the Ministry of Education (China) Key Research Center Projects (Grant No. 16JJD630009, 16JJD630011).

Author information

All authors worked together to design this study. Qinli Xiong and Yang Xiao contributed to initiating and conceiving the topic of this paper. Qinli Xiong and Yang Xiao collected the data and did the analysis. Pinghan Liang, Qinli Xiong, and Yang Xiao wrote the draft of this paper. All authors contributed substantially to modifying and revising this paper.

Correspondence to Yang Xiao or Pinghan Liang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict(s) of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, Q., Xiao, Y., Halmy, M.W.A. et al. A blessing for the Yangtze River: optimization of Chinese regional policy planning for water yield and purification in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07178-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ecological policy
  • Ecosystem service models
  • Human welfare
  • Scenario analysis
  • Water purification