Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Assessment of a batch-flow free water surface constructed wetland planted with Rhynchospora corymbosa (L.) Britton for campus greywater treatment

  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

A pilot-scale batch-flow free water surface (FWS) constructed wetland (CW) system planted with Rhynchospora corymbosa (L.) Britton was developed with a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 2.5 days. The average porosity of the substrate was 0.55 and calculated hydraulic loading rate (HLR) was 3.96 (g BOD/m2-day). Quantitative and qualitative characterization of the greywater were done. The concentrations of pollutants in the greywater before and after it was fed into the FWS CWs were measured using standard sampling and analyses methods. The average daily per capita water use estimated was 162 L, out of which 72.5 L was greywater. The mean removal efficiencies (RE) of the CWs were 81% COD, 85% TN, 82% TK, 10% TP, 0.2% pH, 81% TSS, Zn 91%, 81% Al, 94% Mg, and 90% Fe. It was observed that the FWS with batch-flow configuration tested in the study was slightly different in terms of results reported on the conventional continuous flow system. R. corymbosa as a macrophyte has roots that can provide a surface area for microbial growth and oxygen exchange and can be used as emergent macrophytes in phytoremediation of greywater. The result provided information on the performance and pollutant removal efficiency of a batch-operated FWS CW system planted with R. corymbosa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Abdelhakeem SG, Aboulroos SA, Kamel MM (2016) Performance of a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland under different operational conditions. J Adv Res 7(5):803–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2015.12.002

  2. Abou-Elela SI, Golinelli G, El-Tabl AS, Hellal MS (2014) Treatment of municipal wastewater using horizontal flow constructed wetlands in Egypt. Water Sci Technol 69(1):38–47

  3. Adewumi JR, Ilemobade AA, van Zyl JE (2010) Treated wastewater effluent reuse in South Africa: overview, potential and challenges. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(2):221–331

  4. Akinbile CO, Yusoff MS, Zuki AZ (2012) Landfill leachate treatment using sub-surface flow constructed wetland by Cyperus haspan. Waste Manag 32:1387–1393

  5. Albalawneh A, Chang TK (2015) Review of the greywater and proposed greywater recycling scheme for agricultural irrigation reuse. Int J Res Granthaalayah 3(12):16–35

  6. American Public Health Association. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC, p 1220

  7. Antonopoulos G, Kirkou A, Stasinakis AS (2013) Quantitative and qualitative greywater characterization in Greek households and investigation of their treatment using physicochemical methods. Sci Total Environ 454:426–432

  8. Atanasova N, Dalmau M, Comas J, Poch M, Rodriguez-Roda I, Buttiglieri G (2017) Optimized MBR for greywater reuse systems in hotel facilities. J Environ Manag 193:503–511

  9. Beebe DA, Castle JW, Molz FJ, Rodgers JH (2014) Effects of evapotranspiration on treatment performance in constructed wetlands: experimental studies and modeling. Ecol Eng 71:394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.052

  10. Białowiec A, Albuquerque A, Randerson PF (2014) The influence of evapotranspiration on vertical flow subsurface constructed wetland performance. Ecol Eng 67:89–94

  11. Boyjoo Y, Pareek VK, Ang M (2013) A review of greywater characteristics and treatment processes IWA Publishing 2013. Water Sci Technol 67(7):1403–1424

  12. Brix H, Schierup HH (1990) Soil oxygenation in constructed reed beds: the role of macrophyte and soil-atmosphere interface oxygen transport. In: Cooper PF, Findlater BC (eds) Constructed wetlands in water pollution control. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 53e66

  13. Burgoon PS (1989) Wastewater treatment in vegetated submerged beds using artificial substrates. M.S. thesis, Dep. Environ. Eng. Sci., Univ., Florida, Gainesville

  14. Caselles-Osorio A, García J (2007) Impact of different feeding strategies and plant presence on the performance of shallow horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 378:253e262

  15. Chen Z, Wu S, Braeckevelt M, Paschke H, Kästner M, Köser H, Kuschk P (2012) Effect of vegetation in pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands contaminated with a low and high chlorinated hydrocarbon. Chemosphere 89:724–731

  16. Dwumfour-Asare B, Adantey P, Nyarko KB, Appiah-Effah E (2017) Greywater characterization and handling practices among urban households in Ghana: the case of three communities in Kumasi Metropolis. Water Sci Technol wst2017229

  17. ElZein Z, Abdou A, ElGawad IA (2016) Constructed wetlands as a sustainable wastewater treatment method in communities. Procedia Environ Sci 34:605–617

  18. Eriksson E, Auffarth K, Henze M, Ledin A (2002) Characteristics of grey wastewater. Urban Water 4(1):85–104

  19. Eze VC, Onwuakor CE, Mgbeokwere EU (2015) Comparative analysis of the microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of greywater sources in off-campus hostels at Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4:196–205

  20. Ghaitidak DM, Yadav KD (2013) Characteristics and treatment of greywater—a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(5):2795–2809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1533-0

  21. Gorgoglione A, Torretta V (2018) Sustainable management and successful application of constructed wetlands: a critical review. Sustainability 10(11):3910

  22. Guo C, Cui Y, Dong B, Luo Y, Liu F, Zhao S, Wu H (2017) Test study of the optimal design for hydraulic performance and treatment performance of free water surface flow constructed wetland. Bioresour Technol 238:461–471

  23. Haghshenas-Adarmanabadi A, Heidarpour M, Tarkesh-Esfahani S (2016) Evaluation of horizontal–vertical subsurface hybrid constructed wetlands for tertiary treatment of conventional treatment facilities effluents in developing countries. Water Air Soil Pollut 227(1):28–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2718-6

  24. Hee-Jeong C, Seung-Mok L (2012) Effects of microalgae on the removal of nutrients from wastewater: various concentrations of Chlorella vulgaris. Envrn Eng Res 17(S1):S3–S8

  25. Hoffmann H, Platzer C, Winker M, Muench EV, GIZ (2011) Technology review of constructed wetlands. Subsurface flow constructed wetlands for greywater and domestic wastewater treatment. URL [accessed: 01.02.2017]. PDF. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-013-1533-0

  26. Ilyas H, Masih I (2017) Intensification of constructed wetlands for land area reduction: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(13):12081–12091

  27. Jia W, Zhang J, Li P, Xie H, Wu J, Wang J (2011) Nitrous oxide emissions from surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetland microcosms: effect of feeding strategies. Ecol Eng 37(11):1815–1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.019

  28. Kadlec RH (2005) Phosphorus removal in emergent free surface wetlands. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 40:1293–1306

  29. Katukiza AY, Ronteltap M, Niwagaba CB, Kansiime F, Lens PNL (2015) Greywater characterization and pollutant loads in an urban slum. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(423–436):423–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0451-5

  30. Khan S, Ahmad I, Shah MT, Rehman S, Khaliq A (2009) Use of constructed wetland for the removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. J Environ Manag 90(11):3451–3457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.026

  31. Mekonnen A, Leta S, Njau KN (2014) Wastewater treatment performance efficiency of constructed wetlands in African countries: a review. Water Science and Technology, 71(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.483

  32. Mojiri A, Aziz HA, Zahed MA, Aziz SQ, Selamat MRB (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals from urban waste leachate by southern cattail (Typha domingensis). Int J Sci Res Environ Sci 1(4):63–70

  33. Mustapha HI, van Bruggen JJA, Lens PNL (2015) Vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands for polishing secondary Kaduna refinery wastewater in Nigeria. Ecological Eng 84:588–595

  34. Olanrewaju OO, Ilemobade AA (2015) Greywater reuse review and framework for assessing greywater treatment technologies for toilet flushing. Adv Res 5(4):1–25

  35. Pandey VC, Pandey DN, Singh N (2015) Sustainable phytoremediation based on naturally colonizing and economically valuable plants. J Clean Prod 86:37–39

  36. Prihatini NS, Priatmadi BJ, Masrevaniah A (2015) Performance of the horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetlands with different operational procedures. Int J Adv Eng Technol 7(6):1620

  37. Ramprasad C, Philip L (2016) Surfactants and personal care products removal in pilot scale horizontal and vertical flow constructed wetlands while treating greywater. Chem Eng J 284:458–468

  38. Raphael OD, Ojo SIA, Ogedengbe K, Eghobamien C, Morakinyo AO (2019) Comparison of the performance of horizontal and vertical flow constructed wetland planted with Rhynchopora corymbosa (L.) Britton. Int J Phytoremediation:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2018.1488809

  39. Sadi IA, Adebitan EO (2014) Wastewater recycling in the hospitality industry. Acad J Interdiscip Stud 3(7):87

  40. Stein OR, Hook PB, Biederma AWC, Borden DJ (2003) Does batch operation enhance oxidation in subsurface constructed wetlands? Wat Sci Tech 48(5):149e156

  41. Suelee AL, Hasan SNMS, Kusin FM, Yusuff FM, Ibrahim ZZ (2017) Phytoremediation potential of Vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) for treatment of metal-contaminated water. Water Air Soil Pollut 228(4):158

  42. Tanner CC, D’Eugenio J, McBride GB, Sukias JPS, Thompson K (1999) Effect of water level fluctuation on nitrogen removal from constructed wetland mesocosms. Ecol Eng 12:67e92

  43. Travis MJ, Wiel-Shafran A, Weisbrod N, Adar E, Gross A (2010) Greywater reuse for irrigation: effect on soil properties. Sci Total Environ 408(12):2501–2508

  44. Ukpong EC, Agunwamba J (2012) Grey water reuse for irrigation. Int J Appl Sci Technol 2(8):97–113

  45. USEPA (1982) Handbook for sampling and sample preservation of water and wastewater. EPA-600/4-82-029. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH

  46. Vymazal J (2011) Plants used in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: a review. Hydrobiologia 674:133–156

  47. Vymazal J (2013) Emergent plants used in free water surface constructed wetlands: a review. Ecol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.06.023

  48. Vymazal J (2014) Constructed wetlands for treatment of industrial wastewaters: a review. Ecol Eng 73:724–751

  49. Wallace SD, Knight RL (2006) Small-scale ConstructedWetland TreatmentSystems: Feasibility, Design Criteria and O&M Requirements. Final Report, Project 01-CTS-5.Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), Alexandria, USA

  50. Walton WE, Popko DA, Van Dam AR, Merrill A, Lythgoe J, Hess B (2012) Width of planting beds foremergent vegetation influences mosquito production from a constructed wetland in California (USA). Ecol Eng 42:150–159

  51. WHO and UNICEF (2012) Progress on drinking water and sanitation Joint Monitoring Programme for water supply and sanitation (JMP)

  52. Wu S, Wallace S, Brix H, Kuschk P, Kirui WK, Masi F, Dong R (2015) Treatment of industrial effluents in constructed wetlands: challenges, operational strategies and overall performance. Environ Pollut 201:107–120

  53. Zhang D, Gersberg RM, Ng WJ, Tan SK (2014) Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in aquatic plant-based systems: a review. Environ Pollut 184:620–639

  54. Zietz BP, Richter K, Laß J, Suchenwirth R, Huppmann R (2015) Release of metals from different sections of domestic drinking water installations. Water Qual Expo Health 7(2):193–204

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the laboratory staff and assistants for their commitment. We also appreciate the reviewers whose comments and corrections improved the quality of this work.

Author information

Correspondence to Davids O. Raphael.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Elena Maestri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raphael, D.O., Okunade, D.A., Ogedengbe, K. et al. Assessment of a batch-flow free water surface constructed wetland planted with Rhynchospora corymbosa (L.) Britton for campus greywater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 4275–4283 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07095-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Free water surface
  • Constructed wetlands
  • Greywater
  • Rhynchospora corymbosa (L.) Britton phytoremediation
  • Batch-flow