Advertisement

Climate change impacts and adaptations for fine, coarse, and hybrid rice using CERES-Rice

  • Irfan Rasool Nasir
  • Fahd RasulEmail author
  • Ashfaq Ahmad
  • Hafiz Naeem Asghar
  • Gerrit Hoogenboom
Research Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Climate change has become a threatening issue for major field crops of Pakistan, especially rice. A 2 years’ (2014 and 2015) field trial was conducted on fine, coarse, and hybrid rice at Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad following the split-plot design. Data of growth, yield, and yield components were collected to calibrate and evaluate the CERES-Rice model under Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer (DSSAT). Two cultivars of each type of fine, coarse, and hybrid rice were transplanted with interval of fortnight from May to September during 2014 and 2015. The model was calibrated with non-stressed sowing data during the year 2014 and evaluated with the data of 2015. Climate change scenarios were generated for mid-century (2040–2069) under representative concentration pathway (RCP8.5) using different general circulation models (GCMs) (baseline, cool dry, hot dry, cool wet, hot wet, and middle) were using different General Circulation Models (GCMs). CERES-Rice calibration and evaluation results were quite good to simulate impacts of climate change and to formulate adaptations during 2040–2069 (mid-century). Simulations of all GCMs showed an average increase of 3 °C in average temperature as compared to baseline (1980–2010). Likewise, there would be an average increase of 107.6 mm in rainfall than baseline. The future rise in temperature will reduced the paddy yield by 10.33% in fine, 18–54% in coarse and 24–64% in hybrid rice for mid-century under RCP8.5. To nullified deleterious effects of climate change, some agronomic and genetics adaptation strategies were evaluated with CERES-rice during mid-century. Paddy yield of fine rice was increased by 15% in cool dry and 5% in hot dry GCM. Paddy yield of coarse rice was improved by 15% and 9% under cool dry and hot dry climatic conditions, respectively, with adaptations. For hybrid rice, paddy yield was enhanced by 15% and 0.3% with cool wet and hot dry climatic conditions, respectively. Hot dry climatic conditions were the most threatening for rice crop in rice producing areas of Punjab, Pakistan.

Keywords

Climate change Crop modeling CERES-Rice DSSAT GCMs 

Notes

References

  1. AgMIP (2013) The coordinated climate-crop modeling project C3MP: an initiative of the agricultural model inter comparison and improvement project. C3MP Protocols and Procedures. AgMIPGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad I, Saeed U, Fahad M et al (2018a) Yield forecasting of spring maize using remote sensing and crop modeling in Faisalabad-Punjab Pakistan. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 46:1701–1711.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-018-0825-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad I, Wajid SA, Ahmad A et al (2018b) Assessing the impact of thermo-temporal changes on the productivity of spring maize under semi-arid environment. Int J Agric Biol 20:2203–2210Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad A, Ashfaq M, Wajid A, et al (2019a) Development of climate change adaptation strategies for rice-wheat cropping system of Punjab Pakistan. In: Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES). MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmad I, Wajid SA, Ahmad A et al (2019b) Optimizing irrigation and nitrogen requirements for maize through empirical modeling in semi-arid environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:1227–1237.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2772-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmed I, ur Rahman MH, Ahmed S et al (2018) Assessing the impact of climate variability on maize using simulation modeling under semi-arid environment of Punjab, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:28413–28430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ahmed I, Ullah A,  Rahman MH et al (2019) Climate change impacts and adaptation strategies for agronomic crops. Climate change and agriculture. IntechOpen, In, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  8. Ajala AA, Muhammad A, Yakubu AI et al (2019) Correlation study on growth and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties grown under integrated weed management in Sudan Savanna of Nigeria. J Agric Ecol Res Int 5:1–6Google Scholar
  9. Akhter M, Mahmood A, Haider Z, Saleem U (2019) Development of an aromatic high yielding basmati rice variety having extra long grains and short duration. J Rice Res 7:2Google Scholar
  10. Ali S, Eum H-I, Cho J et al (2019) Assessment of climate extremes in future projections downscaled by multiple statistical downscaling methods over Pakistan. Atmos Res 222:114–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Amin A, Nasim W, Fahad S et al (2018a) Evaluation and analysis of temperature for historical (1996–2015) and projected (2030–2060) climates in Pakistan using SimCLIM climate model: Ensemble application. Atmos Res 213:422–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Amin A, Nasim W, Mubeen M et al (2018b) Simulated CSM-CROPGRO-cotton yield under projected future climate by SimCLIM for southern Punjab, Pakistan. Agric Syst 167:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baliarsingh A, Nanda A, Mohapatra AKB (2018) Effect of rainfall and temperature on rice yield in Puri district of Odisha in India.Google Scholar
  14. Basak JK, Ali MA, Islam MN and Rashid MA. (2010). Assessment of the effect of climate change on boro rice production in Bangladesh using DSSAT model. J. Civil Eng. 38: 95-108.Google Scholar
  15. Boonwichai S, Shrestha S, Babel MS et al (2019) Evaluation of climate change impacts and adaptation strategies on rainfed rice production in Songkhram River Basin, Thailand. Sci Total Environ 652:189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caine RS, Yin X, Sloan J et al (2019) Rice with reduced stomatal density conserves water and has improved drought tolerance under future climate conditions. New Phytol 221:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fahad S, Adnan M, Hassan S, et al (2019) Rice responses and tolerance to high temperature. Adv Rice Res Abiotic Stress Toler  12: 201–224. Google Scholar
  18. FAOSTAT (2018) FAOSTAT database collections. RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrari S, Pagliari P, Trettel J (2018) Optimum sowing date and genotype testing for upland rice production in Brazil. Sci Rep 8:8227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta R, Mishra A (2019) Climate change induced impact and uncertainty of rice yield of agro-ecological zones of India. Agric Syst 173:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hasan SA (2019) Price hike of staple food, nutritional impact and consumption adjustment: evidence from the 2005–2010 rice price increase in rural Bangladesh. Appl Econ 51:743–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawkesford MJ, Griffiths S (2019) Exploiting genetic variation in nitrogen use efficiency for cereal crop improvement. Curr Opin Plant Biol 49:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Shelia V et al (2016) Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT) Version 4.7 (https://DSSAT.net). DSSAT Foundation, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu Y, Fan L, Liu Z, et al (2018) Rice production and climate change in Northeast China: evidence of adaptation through land use shiftsGoogle Scholar
  25. Hudson N, Ruane A (2013) Guide for running AgMIP climate scenario generation tools with R. AgMIP. Available online: http://www.agmip.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Guide-for-Running-AgMIPClimate-Scenario-Generation-withhttp://www. agmip. org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Guide-for-Running-AgMIPClimate-Scenario-Generation-with
  26. Hunt LA, Boote KJ (1998) Data for model operation, calibration, and evaluation. Understanding options for agricultural production. Springer, In, pp 9–39Google Scholar
  27. Jagadish SVK, Murty MVR, Quick WP (2015) Rice responses to rising temperatures–challenges, perspectives and future directions. Plant Cell Environ 38:1686–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones JW, Mishoe JW and Boote KJ. (1987). Introduction to simulation and modeling. Technical Bulletin 10. Florida, USA: ASPAC-Food and Fertilizer Technology Center.Google Scholar
  29. Kaya-Altop E, Şahin M, Jabran K et al (2019) Effect of different water management strategies on competitive ability of semi-dwarf rice cultivars with Echinochloa oryzoides. Crop Prot 116:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khanal U, Wilson C, Hoang V-N, Lee B (2018) Farmers’ adaptation to climate change, its determinants and impacts on rice yield in Nepal. Ecol Econ 144:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kontgis C, Schneider A, Ozdogan M et al (2019) Climate change impacts on rice productivity in the Mekong River Delta. Appl Geogr 102:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li T, Hasegawa T, Yin X et al (2015) Uncertainties in predicting rice yield by current crop models under a wide range of climatic conditions. Glob Chang Biol 21:1328–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu L, Liao J, Chen X et al (2017) The microwave temperature vegetation drought index (MTVDI) based on AMSR-E brightness temperatures for long-term drought assessment across China (2003–2010). Remote Sens Environ 199:302–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moodie CD, Smith HW, McCreery RA (1959) Laboratory manual for soil fertility, Washington State College Mimeograph, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. Nasim W, Amin A, Fahad S et al (2018) Future risk assessment by estimating historical heat wave trends with projected heat accumulation using SimCLIM climate model in Pakistan. Atmos Res 205:118–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oteng-Darko P, Kyei-Baffour N, Ofori E. (2012) Simulating rice yields under climate change scenarios using the CERES-Rice model. African Crop Science Journal. 20(2):401-8.Google Scholar
  37. Patel AR, Patel ML, Patel RK, Mote BM (2019) Effect of different sowing date on phenology, growth and yield of rice–a review. Plant Arch 19:12–16Google Scholar
  38. Piper CS (1966) Soil and plant analysis. Hans Publishers, BombayGoogle Scholar
  39. Rahman MH, Ahmad A, Wang X et al (2018) Multi-model projections of future climate and climate change impacts uncertainty assessment for cotton production in Pakistan. Agric For Meteorol 253:94–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenzweig C, Elliott J, Deryng D et al (2014) Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:3268–3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saha S, Mukherjee A, Banerjee S (2019) Effect of transplanting dates, cultivars and irrigation regimes on microclimate and yield of rice. Int J Bio Res Stre Mang 10: 4-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sasaki T, Ashikari M (2018) Rice genomics, genetics and breeding. Springer, In, pp:44-60Google Scholar
  43. Tariq M, Ahmad S, Fahad S et al (2018) The impact of climate warming and crop management on phenology of sunflower-based cropping systems in Punjab, Pakistan. Agric For Meteorol 256:270–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylaran RD, Elmundo EM, Gonzaga Jr AB (2018) Response of high-yielding upland rice to fertilization for intensive nutrient production system. Prism 23: 15-30Google Scholar
  45. Taylor KE, Balaji V, Hankin S, et al (2012) CMIP5 data reference syntax (DRS) and controlled vocabularies. Retrieved from C Coupled Model Intercomp Proj http//cmip-pcmdi llnl gov/cmip5 12–45Google Scholar
  46. Tiamiyu SA, Eze JN, Yusuf TM et al (2015) Rainfall variability and its effect on yield of rice in Nigeria. Int Lett Nat Sci 49:63–68Google Scholar
  47. Ullah A, Ahmad I, Ahmad A et al (2019a) Assessing climate change impacts on pearl millet under arid and semi-arid environments using CSM-CERES-Millet model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:6745–6757.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3925-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ullah A, Ahmad I, Saeed U et al (2019b) Climate smart interventions of small-holder farming systems. Climate Change and Agriculture. IntechOpen,  In, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  49. Van Oort PAJ, Zwart SJ (2018) Impacts of climate change on rice production in Africa and causes of simulated yield changes. Glob Chang Biol 24:1029–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vanli Ö, Ustundag BB, Ahmad I et al (2019) Using crop modeling to evaluate the impacts of climate change on wheat in southeastern turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 40: 1–12Google Scholar
  51. Wang J, Vanga SK, Saxena R et al (2018) Effect of climate change on the yield of cereal crops: a review. Climate 6:41-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang Y, Wang L, Chen H, et al (2019) Sowingdates have different effects on spikelet formation among different photoperiod-sensitive rice genotypes.Google Scholar
  53. Waqas MM, Awan UK, Cheema MJM et al (2019) Estimation of canal water deficit using satellite remote sensing and GIS: A case study in lower chenab canal system. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 30:1–10Google Scholar
  54. Zhang C, Zhou L, Zhu Z et al (2016) Characterization of grain quality and starch fine structure of two japonica rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars with good sensory properties at different temperatures during the filling stage. J Agric Food Chem 64:4048–4057CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgronomyUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Institute of Soil and Environment SciencesUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  3. 3.Agricultural and Biological EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations