Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Identification of microplastics in wastewater samples by means of polarized light optical microscopy

  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

Many reports state the potential hazards of microplastics (MPs) and their implications to wildlife and human health. The presence of MP in the aquatic environment is related to several origins but particularly associated to their occurrence in wastewater effluents. The determination of MP in these complex samples is a challenge. Current analytical procedures for MP monitoring are based on separation and counting by visual observation or mediated with some type of microscopy with further identification by techniques such as Raman or Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. In this work, a simple alternative for the separation, counting and identification of MP in wastewater samples is reported. The presented sample preparation technique with further polarized light optical microscopy (PLOM) observation positively identified the vast majority of MP particles occurring in wastewater samples of Montevideo, Uruguay, in the 70–600 μm range. MPs with different shapes and chemical composition were identified by PLOM and confirmed by confocal Raman microscopy. Rapid identification of polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) were evidenced. A major limitation was found in the identification of MP from non-birefringent polymers such as PVC (polyvinylchloride). The proposed procedure for MP analysis in wastewater is easy to be implemented at any analytical laboratory. A pilot monitoring of Montevideo WWTP effluents was carried out over 3-month period identifying MP from different chemical identities in the range 5.3–8.2 × 103 MP items/m3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Abbasi S, Keshavarzi B, Moore F, Delshab H, Soltani N, Sorooshian A (2017) Investigation of microrubbers, microplastics and heavy metals in street dust: a study in Bushehr city. Iran Environ Earth Sci 76:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7137-0

  2. Abbasi S, Soltani N, Keshavarzi B, Moore F, Turner A, Hassanaghaei M (2018) Microplastics in different tissues of fish and prawn from the Musa Estuary, Persian Gulf. Chemosphere 205:80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.076

  3. Abbasi S, Keshavarzi B, Moore F, Turner A, Kelly FJ, Dominguez AO, Jaafarzadeh N (2019) Distribution and potential health impacts of microplastics and microrubbers in air and street dusts from Asaluyeh County, Iran. Environ. Pollut. 244:153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2018.10.039

  4. Araujo CF, Nolasco MM, Ribeiro AMP, Ribeiro-Claro PJA (2018) Identification of microplastics using Raman spectroscopy: latest developments and future prospects. Water Res 142:426–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.060

  5. Arthur C, Baker J, Bamford H (2009) Proceedings of the International Research Workshop on the occurrence, effects, and fate of microplastic marine debris. Group 530

  6. ASM International (2000) Practical guide to image analysis

  7. Barboza LGA, Dick Vethaak A, Lavorante BRBO, Lundebye AK, Guilhermino L (2018) Marine microplastic debris: an emerging issue for food security, food safety and human health. Mar Pollut Bull 133:336–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.047

  8. Bergmann M, Klages M, Bergmann M, Klages M (2015) Marine anthropogenic litter. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3

  9. Browne, M.A., Crump, P., Niven, S.J., Teuten, E., Tonkin, A., Galloway, T., Thompson, R., 2011. Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks 9175–9179

  10. Carbery M, O’Connor W, Palanisami T (2018) Trophic transfer of microplastics and mixed contaminants in the marine food web and implications for human health. Environ Int 115:400–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.007

  11. Carr SA, Liu J, Tesoro AG (2016) Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 91:174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.002

  12. Claessens M, Van Cauwenberghe L, Vandegehuchte MB, Janssen CR (2013) New techniques for the detection of microplastics in sediments and field collected organisms. Mar Pollut Bull 70:227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.03.009

  13. Collard F, Gilbert B, Compère P, Eppe G, Das K, Jauniaux T, Parmentier E (2017) Microplastics in livers of European anchovies (Engraulis encrasicolus, L.). Environ Pollut 229:1000–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.089

  14. da Costa JP (2018) Micro- and nanoplastics in the environment: research and policymaking. Curr Opin Environ Sci Heal 1:12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2017.11.002

  15. da Costa JP, Santos PSM, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos T (2016) (Nano)plastics in the environment - sources, fates and effects. Sci. Total Environ 566–567:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.041

  16. De Falco F, Gullo MP, Gentile G, Di Pace E, Cocca M, Gelabert L, Brouta-Agnésa M, Rovira A, Escudero R, Villalba R, Mossotti R, Montarsolo A, Gavignano S, Tonin C, Avella M (2018) Evaluation of microplastic release caused by textile washing processes of synthetic fabrics. Environ Pollut 236:916–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.057

  17. de Sá LC, Oliveira M, Ribeiro F, Rocha TL, Futter MN (2018) Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: what do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? Sci Total Environ 645:1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.07.207

  18. Dehghani S, Moore F, Akhbarizadeh R (2017) Microplastic pollution in deposited urban dust, Tehran metropolis. Iran Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:20360–20371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9674-1

  19. Dugas J, Pierrejean I, Farenc J, Peichot JP (1994) Birefringence and internal stress in polystyrene optical fibers. Appl Opt 33:3545–3548. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.003545

  20. Dyachenko A, Mitchell J, Arsem N (2016) Extraction and identification of microplastic particles from secondary wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent 00, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1039/x0xx00000x

  21. Eckert EM, Di Cesare A, Kettner MT, Arias-Andres M, Fontaneto D, Grossart HP, Corno G (2018) Microplastics increase impact of treated wastewater on freshwater microbial community. Environ Pollut 234:495–502

  22. Erni-Cassola G, Gibson MI, Thompson RC, Christie-Oleza JA (2017) Lost, but found with Nile red: a novel method for detecting and quantifying small microplastics (1 mm to 20 μm) in environmental samples. Environ Sci Technol 51:13641–13648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04512

  23. Filella M (2015) Questions of size and numbers in environmental research on microplastics: methodological and conceptual aspects. Environ Chem 12:527–538. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN15012

  24. Frias JPGL, Nash R (2019) Microplastics: finding a consensus on the definition. Mar Pollut Bull 138:145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022

  25. Ghosal S, Chen M, Wagner J, Wang ZM, Wall S (2018) Molecular identification of polymers and anthropogenic particles extracted from oceanic water and fish stomach – a Raman micro-spectroscopy study. Environ Pollut 233:1113–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.014

  26. Gies EA, LeNoble JL, Noël M, Etemadifar A, Bishay F, Hall ER, Ross PS (2018) Retention of microplastics in a major secondary wastewater treatment plant in Vancouver. Canada Mar Pollut Bull 133:553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.006

  27. Gündoğdu S, Çevik C, Güzel E, Kilercioğlu S (2018) Microplastics in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Turkey: a comparison of the influent and secondary effluent concentrations. Environ Monit Assess 190:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7010-y

  28. HELCOM (2014) Preliminary study on synthetic microfibers and particles at a municipal waste water treatment plant. Balt. Mar. Environ. Prot. Comm. HELCOM 14 p

  29. Hurley RR, Nizzetto L (2018) Fate and occurrence of micro(nano)plastics in soils: knowledge gaps and possible risks. Curr Opin Environ Sci Heal 1:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.006

  30. Kalčíková G, Alič B, Skalar T, Bundschuh M, Gotvajn AŽ (2017) Wastewater treatment plant effluents as source of cosmetic polyethylene microbeads to freshwater. Chemosphere 188:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.131

  31. Kay P, Hiscoe R, Moberley I, Bajic L, Mckenna N, Kay P (2018) Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics in river catchments 2014–2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2070-7

  32. Lares M, Ncibi MC, Sillanpää M, Sillanpää M (2018) Occurrence, identification and removal of microplastic particles and fibers in conventional activated sludge process and advanced MBR technology. Water Res 133:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.049

  33. Lee H, Kim Y (2018) Treatment characteristics of microplastics at biological sewage treatment facilities in Korea. Mar Pollut Bull 137:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.050

  34. Li X, Chen L, Mei Q, Dong B, Dai X, Ding G, Zeng EY (2018) Microplastics in sewage sludge from the wastewater treatment plants in China. Water Res 142:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.034

  35. Maes T, Jessop R, Wellner N, Haupt K, Mayes AG (2017) A rapid-screening approach to detect and quantify microplastics based on fluorescent tagging with Nile red. Sci Rep 7:1–10

  36. Magni S, Binelli A, Pittura L, Giacomo C, Della C, Carla C, Gorbi S, Regoli F (2019) Science of the total environment the fate of microplastics in an Italian wastewater treatment plant. Sci Total Environ 652:602–610

  37. Magnusson K, Norén F (2014) Screening of microplastic particles in and down-stream a wastewater treatment plant. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. DOCUMENT NV-05269-13

  38. Masura J, Baker J, Foster G, Arthur C (2015) Laboratory methods for the analysis of microplastics in the marine environment: recommendations for quantifying synthetic particles in watersand sediments. NOAA Tech Memo 39

  39. Mintenig SM, Int-Veen I, Löder MGJ, Primpke S, Gerdts G (2017) Identification of microplastic in effluents of waste water treatment plants using focal plane array-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging. Water Res 108:365–372

  40. Murphy F, Ewins C, Carbonnier F, Quinn B (2016) Wastewater treatment works (WwTW) as a source of microplastics in the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Technol 50:5800–5808

  41. Prata JC (2018) Microplastics in wastewater: state of the knowledge on sources, fate and solutions. Mar Pollut Bull 129:262–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.02.046

  42. Quinn B, Murphy F, Ewins C (2017) Validation of density separation for the rapid recovery of microplastics from sediment. Anal Methods 9:1491–1498. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY02542K

  43. Rachid D, Gasperi J, Rocher V, Saad M, Nicolas Renault BT (2015) Microplastic contamination in an urban area: a case study in greater Paris. Environ Chem 12:592–599

  44. Revel M, Châtel A, Mouneyrac C (2018) Micro(nano)plastics: a threat to human health? Curr Opin Environ Sci Heal 1:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.003

  45. Rodríguez Chialanza M, Sierra I, Pérez Parada A, Fornaro L (2018) Identification and quantitation of semi-crystalline microplastics using image analysis and differential scanning calorimetry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:16767–16775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1846-0

  46. Sawyer LC, Grubb DT, Meyers GF (2008) Polymer microscopy: Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72628-1

  47. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089

  48. Shim WJ, Song YK, Hong SH, Jang M (2016) Identification and quantification of microplastics using Nile red staining. Mar Pollut Bull. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.049

  49. Simon M, van Alst N, Vollertsen J (2018) Quantification of microplastic mass and removal rates at wastewater treatment plants applying focal plane Array (FPA)-based Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) imaging. Water Res 142:1–9

  50. Sun J, Dai X, Wang Q, van Loosdrecht MCM, Ni BJ (2019) Water Research 152:21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.050

  51. Sutton R, Mason SA, Stanek SK, Willis-Norton E, Wren IF, Box C (2016) Microplastic contamination in the San Francisco Bay, California. USA Mar Pollut Bull 109:230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.077

  52. Talvitie J, Heinonen M, Pääkkönen JP, Vahtera E, Mikola A, Setälä O, Vahala R (2015) Do wastewater treatment plants act as a potential point source of microplastics? Preliminary study in the coastal Gulf of Finland. Baltic Sea Water Sci Technol 72:1495–1504. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.360

  53. Talvitie J, Mikola A, Setï O, Heinonen M, Koistinen A (2017) How well is microlitter purified from wastewater? – A detailed study on the stepwise removal of microlitter in a tertiary level wastewater treatment plant. Water Res 109:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.046

  54. Vaughan R, Turner SD, Rose NL (2017) Microplastics in the sediments of a UK urban lake. Environ Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.057

  55. von Moos N, Burkhardt-Holm P, Koehler A (2012) Uptake and effects of microplastics on cells and tissue of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. after an experimental exposure. Environ Sci Technol 46:327–335. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302332w

  56. Wagner J, Wang Z-M, Ghosal S, Rochman C, Gassel M, Wall S (2017) Novel method for the extraction and identification of microplastics in ocean trawl and fish gut matrices. Anal Methods 62:2588–2597. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY02396G

  57. Zhou Q, Zhang H, Fu C, Zhou Y, Dai Z, Li Y, Tu C, Luo Y (2018) The distribution and morphology of microplastics in coastal soils adjacent to the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea. Geoderma 322:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2018.02.015

  58. Ziajahromi S, Neale PA, Rintoul L, Leusch FDL (2017) Wastewater treatment plants as a pathway for microplastics: development of a new approach to sample wastewater-based microplastics. Water Res 112:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.042

  59. Zubia J, Arrue J, Mendioroz A (1997) Theoretical analysis of the torsion-induced optical effect in a plastic optical Fiber. Opt Fiber Technol 3:162–167. https://doi.org/10.1006/ofte.1997.0212

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to thank WWTP staff at Punta Carretas, Intendencia de Montevideo.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion (ANII) by Project FCE_2016_1_127100. Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI, ANII) and PEDECIBA Química are acknowledged for financial support.

Author information

Correspondence to Andrés Pérez-Parada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Christian Gagnon

Electronic supplementary material

Figure S1

Examples of OAPs-C microplastics from wastewater under PLOM. Different examples such as fibres, fragments and films are shown. The particles are shown under unpolarised light (particle on the left, pink background) and polarized (particle on the right, blue background). Under polarized light we can observe the phenomenon of birefringence that allows the primary identification of microplastics. (JPG 89 kb)

Figure S2

Examples of OAPs-W microplastics from wastewater under PLOM. Different examples such as fibres, fragments and films are shown. The particles are shown under unpolarised light (particle on the left, pink background) and polarized (particle on the right, blue background). Under polarized light differences to OAPs-C are exhibited. (JPG 988 kb)

Fig S3

SEM/EDX analysis of MPs in wastewater. Composition of selected particles (film, fibre and hexagon (W%: weight percent and A%: atomic percent). (JPG 1265 kb)

Fig S4

toilet paper cellulose under PLOM. (JPG 40 kb)

Table S1

(DOCX 11 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sierra, I., Chialanza, M.R., Faccio, R. et al. Identification of microplastics in wastewater samples by means of polarized light optical microscopy. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07011-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Microplastics
  • Wastewater
  • Water pollution
  • Polarized light optical microscopy
  • Raman microscopy