Advertisement

Enhanced selective removal of arsenic(V) using a hybrid nanoscale zirconium molybdate embedded anion exchange resin

  • Trung Huu Bui
  • Sung Pil Hong
  • Jeyong YoonEmail author
Research Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Selective removal of trace arsenic is crucial for obtaining safe drinking water. Here, the selective adsorptive performance of arsenate (As(V)) on a hybrid ZMAE (nanoscale zirconium molybdate embedded a macroporous anion exchange resin) was examined. It was found that the As(V) adsorption efficiency of ZMAE was almost retained in the presence of competing ions (NO3 or SO42−) up an [SO42−]/[As] or [NO3]/[As] ratio of 150/1, whereas that of bare AE (anion exchange resin) was negligible for [SO4]/[As] over 15/1. In addition, the As(V) maximum adsorption capacity of ZMAE was found to be 41.2 mg/g, which is in contrast with the negligible adsorption of bare AE under sulfate-rich condition. The enhanced arsenate selectivity of ZMAE can be attributed to the excellent selectivity of ZM NPs (zirconium molybdate nanoparticles), which contributed up to 45% of the adsorption capacity of ZMAE. The behavior of ZMAE towards arsenate was compared with that towards phosphate showing similar adsorption performances between them, which indicates the similar affinity of ZMAE towards arsenate and phosphate. Finally, ZMAE examined for fixed-bed column adsorption for As(V) removal from synthetic As(V) water was effective for up to 5100 BVs, treating As(V) from 0.1 mg/L to below 0.01 mg/L (meeting the WHO guidelines).

Keywords

Arsenic removal Selective adsorption Influence of sulfate Zirconium molybdate Hybrid adsorbent Anion exchange resin 

Notes

Funding information

This research was financially supported by the Korea Ministry of Environment as “Global Top Project (E617-00211-0608-0).

Supplementary material

11356_2019_6864_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1163 kb)

References

  1. Acelas NY, Martin BD, Lopez D, Jefferson B (2015) Selective removal of phosphate from wastewater using hydrated metal oxides dispersed within anionic exchange media. Chemosphere 119:1353–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awual MR, El-Safty SA, Jyo A (2011) Removal of trace arsenic(V) and phosphate from water by a highly selective ligand exchange adsorbent. J Environ Sci 23:1947–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awual MR, Shenashen MA, Yaita T, Shiwaku H, Jyo A (2012) Efficient arsenic(V) removal from water by ligand exchange fibrous adsorbent. Water Res 46:5541–5550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobtelsky M, Barzily I (1963) A rapid and precise heterometric method for the determination of traces of phosphoric or arsenic acid with nitron and molybdate. Anal Chim Acta 28:118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bui TH, Hong SP, Yoon J (2018) Development of nanoscale zirconium molybdate embedded anion exchange resin for selective removal of phosphate. Water Res 134:22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campen WAC, Sledsens AMJ (1961) An investigation of the quinoline phosphomolybdate method for determining phosphate: its applicability in international trade. Analyst 86:467–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cui H, Su Y, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK (2013) Exceptional arsenic (III,V) removal performance of highly porous, nanostructured ZrO2 spheres for fixed bed reactors and the full-scale system modeling. Water Res 47:6258–6268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cumbal L, SenGupta AK (2005) Arsenic removal using polymer-supported hydrated iron(III) oxide nanoparticles: role of Donnan membrane effect†. Environ Sci Technol 39:6508–6515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. German M, Seingheng H, SenGupta AK (2014) Mitigating arsenic crisis in the developing world: role of robust, reusable and selective hybrid anion exchanger (HAIX). Sci Total Environ 488-489:547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenleaf JE, Lin J-c, Sengupta AK (2006) Two novel applications of ion exchange fibers: arsenic removal and chemical-free softening of hard water. Environ Prog 25:300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang ZM, Zhang SJ, Pan BC, Wang WF, Wang XS, Lv L, Zhang WM, Zhang QX (2012) A fabrication strategy for nanosized zero valent iron (nZVI)-polymeric anion exchanger composites with tunable structure for nitrate reduction. J Hazard Mater 233:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Korngold E, Belayev N, Aronov L (2001) Removal of arsenic from drinking water by anion exchangers. Desalination 141:81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li X, He K, Pan B, Zhang S, Lu L, Zhang W (2012) Efficient As(III) removal by macroporous anion exchanger-supported Fe–Mn binary oxide: Behavior and mechanism. Chem Eng J 193–194:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li H, Shan C, Zhang Y, Cai J, Zhang W, Pan B (2016) Arsenate adsorption by hydrous ferric oxide nanoparticles embedded in cross-linked anion exchanger: effect of the host pore structure. ACS APPL MATER INTER 8:3012–3020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luong VT, Cañas Kurz EE, Hellriegel U, Luu TL, Hoinkis J, Bundschuh J (2018) Iron-based subsurface arsenic removal technologies by aeration: a review of the current state and future prospects. Water Res 133:110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ma J, Sengupta MK, Yuan D, Dasgupta PK (2014) Speciation and detection of arsenic in aqueous samples: a review of recent progress in non-atomic spectrometric methods. Anal Chim Acta 831:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Padungthon S, German M, Wiriyathamcharoen S, SenGupta AK (2015) Polymeric anion exchanger supported hydrated Zr(IV) oxide nanoparticles: a reusable hybrid sorbent for selective trace arsenic removal. React Funct Polym 93:84–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pan B, Xu J, Wu B, Li Z, Liu X (2013) Enhanced removal of fluoride by polystyrene anion exchanger supported hydrous zirconium oxide nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 47:9347–9354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pérez J, Toledo L, Campos CH, Rivas BL, Yañez J, Urbano BF (2016) Organic-inorganic interpenetrated hybrids based on cationic polymer and hydrous zirconium oxide for arsenate and arsenite removal. Chem Eng J 287:744–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sarkar S, Blaney LM, Gupta A, Ghosh D, SenGupta AK (2007) Use of ArsenXnp, a hybrid anion exchanger, for arsenic removal in remote villages in the Indian subcontinent. React Funct Polym 67:1599–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarkar S, Guibal E, Quignard F, SenGupta AK (2012) Polymer-supported metals and metal oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and applications. J Nanopart Res 14:715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sengupta AK, Padungthon S (2015) Hybrid anion exchanger impregnated with hydrated zirconium oxide for selective removal of contaminating ligand and methods of manufacture and use thereof The United States Patent 9120093Google Scholar
  23. Singh R, Singh S, Parihar P, Singh VP, Prasad SM (2015) Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 112:247–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sø HU, Postma D, Jakobsen R, Larsen F (2012) Competitive adsorption of arsenate and phosphate onto calcite; experimental results and modeling with CCM and CD-MUSIC. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 93:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Su C, Puls RW (2001) Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: kinetics, redox transformation, and implications for in situ groundwater remediation. Environ Sci Technol 35:1487–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Su Y, Cui H, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK (2013) Strong adsorption of phosphate by amorphous zirconium oxide nanoparticles. Water Res 47:5018–5026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taurozzi JS, Arul H, Bosak VZ, Burban AF, Voice TC, Bruening ML, Tarabara VV (2008) Effect of filler incorporation route on the properties of polysulfone–silver nanocomposite membranes of different porosities. J Membr Sci 325:58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tsang S, Phu F, Baum MM, Poskrebyshev GA (2007) Determination of phosphate/arsenate by a modified molybdenum blue method and reduction of arsenate by S2O4 2−. Talanta 71:1560–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang S, Gao B, Li Y, Zimmerman AR, Cao X (2016) Sorption of arsenic onto Ni/Fe layered double hydroxide (LDH)-biochar composites. RSC Adv 6:17792–17799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu Y-h, Nakajima T, Ohki A (2002) Adsorption and removal of arsenic(V) from drinking water by aluminum-loaded Shirasu-zeolite. J Hazard Mater 92:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yu C, Peltola P, Nystrand MI, Virtasalo JJ, Österholm P, Ojala AEK, Hogmalm JK, Åström ME (2016) Arsenic removal from contaminated brackish sea water by sorption onto Al hydroxides and Fe phases mobilized by land-use. Sci Total Environ 542:923–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Q, Pan B, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhang W, Lv L (2011) New insights into nanocomposite adsorbents for water treatment: a case study of polystyrene-supported zirconium phosphate nanoparticles for lead removal. J Nanopart Res 13:5355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, College of Engineering, Institute of Chemical ProcessSeoul National University (SNU)SeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Faculty of Environmental and Food EngineeringNguyen Tat Thanh UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  3. 3.Korea Environment InstituteSejong-siKorea

Personalised recommendations